Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of CaO-CaF2-SiO2-Al2O3 Based Electrode Coating Constituents and their Interactions on the P22 Alloy SMAW Dissimilar Weld Metal delta Quantities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article attempts to predict the element transfer behaviour in the shielded metal arc welding process (SMAW). Suitable selections of coating compositions are critical and effective in improving the mechanical and metallurgical properties of weldments. In the present study 21, basic electrode coating compositions were decided by using Al2O3-SiO2-CaO SiO2-CaO-CaF2 and experimental phase diagrams. At constant welding parameters, twenty-one series of bead on plate experiments were performed by using developed SMAW fluxes. Using the mixture design, statistical approach different mathematical models was developed in terms of flux constituents. Regression equations in terms of individual, binary and ternary flux mixtures were developed. Results indicate that there were a predominant effect on weld metal-carbon, silicon, manganese, sulphur, phosphorous, molybdenum and chromium contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

I Dr. Sumit Mahajan (Corresponding Author) certified that data & material will be available on author’s request.

References

  1. David SA, Siefert JA, Feng Z (2013) Welding and weldability of candidate ferritic alloys for future advanced ultrasupercritical fossil power plants. Sci Technol Weld Join 18(8):631–651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cerjak H (2008) The role of welding in the power generation industry. Weld World 52:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mahajan S, Chhibber R (2020) (). Investigations on dissimilar welding of P91/SS304L using nickel-based electrodes, mater. Manuf. Process. 35(9):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu S, Redrickson GL, Johnson MQ, Edward GR (1992) Shielded Metal Arc Welding Consumables for Advanced High Strength Steels, Work performed under Contract N00014–89-J-3170, annual Progress Report. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235101968_Shielded_Metal_Arc_Welding_Consumables_for_Advanced_High_Strength_Steels)

  5. Murugan N, Gunaraj V (2005) Prediction and control of weld bead geometry and shape relationships in submerged arc welding of pipes. J Mater Process Technol 168:478–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hashemi SH, Mohammadyani D (2012) Characterisation of weldment hardness, impact energy and microstructure in API X65 steel. Int J Press Vessel Pip 98:8–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanjilal P, Pal TK, Majumdar SK (2006) Combined effect of flux and welding parameters on chemical composition and mechanical properties of submerged arc weld metal. J Mater Process Technol 171:223–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien A, Guzman C (2004) Welding handbook: welding processes, part 2. Miami, FL, American Welding Society

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oh DW, Olson DL, Frost RH (1991) Welding and joining processes. Presented at the winter annual meeting of the ASME, Atlanta, GA, pp 1–6 December

  10. Cochrane RC, Ward JL, Keville BR (1983) The influence of deoxidation and/or desulphurisation practice on the weld metal toughness of high dilution welds. In: the effects of residual, impurity, and microalloying elements on weldability and weld properties, London, 15–17. The Welding Institute, Cambridge, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barritte GS, Edmonds DV (1981) Proceedings conference on advances in the physical metallurgy of steel. The Metals Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kalisz D (2012) Influence of casting mold slag on the progress of casting process. Arch Metall Mater 58(1):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eriksson G, Pelton AD (1993) Critical evaluation and optimization of thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams of the CaO-Al2O3, Al2O3-SiO2 and CaO- SiO2-Al2O3 systems. Metall Mater Trans B 24:807–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahajan S, Chhibber R (2019) Investigation on slags of CaO-CaF2-SiO2- Al2O3 based electrode coatings developed for power plant welds. Ceram Int 46(7):8774–8786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson VL, McLean RA (1974) Design of experiments: a realistic approach. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mitra U, Eagar TW (1984) Slag metal reactions during submerged arc welding of alloy steels. Metall Trans A 15:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanjilal P, Majumdar SK, Pal TK (2005) Prediction of acicular ferrite from flux ingredients in submerged arc weld metal of C-Mn steel. ISIJ Int 45:876–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pandey ND, Bharti A, Gupta SR (1994) Effect of submerged arc welding parameters and fluxes on element transfer behaviour and weld-metal chemistry. J Mater Process Technol 40:195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanjilal P, Pal TK, Majumdar SK (2007) Prediction of element transfer in submerged arc welding. Weld J 86:135s–146s

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burck PA, Indacochea JE, Olson DL (1990) Effects of welding flux additions on 4340 steel weld metal composition. Weld J 3:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chai CS, Eagar TW (1980) The effect of SAW parameters on weld metal chemistry. Weld J 59:93s–98s

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mahajan S, Kumar J, Chhibber R (2020) High-temperature wettability investigations on laboratory-developed CaO-CaF2-SiO2 -Al2O3 flux system-based welding electrode coatings for power plant applications. Silicon 12:2741–2753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang K-L, Huang C-T, Huang W et al (2008) Investigations of microstructure and phosphorus distribution in BOF slag. China Steel Tech Rep 21:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bhandari D, Chhibber R, Arora N (2012) Effect of electrode coatings on diffusible hydrogen content, hardness and microstructures of the ferritic heat affected zones in bimetallic welds. Adv Mater Res 383:4697–4701

    Google Scholar 

  25. Singh K and Pandey S. Economics of recycling submerged arc welding slag as a flux. In: proceedings of the 8th international conference on trends in welding research, Pine Mountain, GA, 2–6 June 2008, pp.806–810. Materials park, OH: ASM International

  26. Jindal S, Chhibber R, Mehta NP (2014) Effect of welding parameters on bead profile, microhardness and H2 content in submerged arc welding of high-strength low-alloy steel. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engin Manufact 228:82–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Paniagua-Mercado AM, Lopez-Hirata VM (2011) Chemical and physical properties of fluxes for SAW of low-carbon steels. Arc Weld 13:281–298

    Google Scholar 

  28. Du Plessis J, du Toit M, Pistorius PC (2007) Control of diffusible weld metal hydrogen through flux chemistry modification. Weld J 86:273s–280s

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mahajan S, Chhibber R (2020) Experimental investigations on P22/P91 dissimilar shielded metal arc welds for power plant applications. Proc the Insti Mechan Engin, Part L: J Mater: Design Appli 234(10):1313–1324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hummel FA (1984) Introduction to phase equilibrium in ceramics systems. CRC Press Ltd, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  31. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Harrington EC (1965) The desirability function. Ind Qual Control 21:494–498

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

It is requested to editorial board to please acknowledge the present research for possible publication in Silicon journal. The content is new and unpublished.

Author Contribution

It is certified on behalf of corresponding author (Dr. Sumit Mahajan) that all authors are equally contributed in the present manuscript.

Funding

It is certified on behalf of corresponding author (Dr. Sumit Mahajan) that present research is not funded by any external agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit Mahajan.

Ethics declarations

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

The present research is involved for human participants.

Ethics Approval

I Dr. Sumit Mahajan (Corresponding Author) on behalf of other co-authors certified that I have taken the ethical approval to publish the data presented in the manuscript. Also the data used in this manuscript (such as figures) has been cited in this paper.

Informed Consent

N/A

Consent to Participate

N/A

Consent of Publication

I Dr. Sumit Mahajan (Corresponding Author) on behalf of other coauthors certified that I have taken the permission to publish the present content.

Conflict of Interest

It is certified on behalf of corresponding author (Dr. Sumit Mahajan) that present research is not funded by any external agency and authors declared that there is no conflicts of interest in the present research.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahajan, S., Sharma, L. & Chhibber, R. Effect of CaO-CaF2-SiO2-Al2O3 Based Electrode Coating Constituents and their Interactions on the P22 Alloy SMAW Dissimilar Weld Metal delta Quantities. Silicon 14, 12315–12327 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01937-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01937-8

Keywords

Navigation