Abstract
The objective of this paper is to map landslide susceptibility using a statistical analysis model and the radius of influence within a geographic information systems environment. The statistical analysis included triggering factors (e.g., topography, land cover, forest, and soil properties) of adjacent areas, in addition to the landslide sites themselves. To estimate the probability of landslide occurrence using the radius of influence, and to produce a landslide susceptibility index (LSI), we performed frequency radio (FR) analysis by applying the radius of influence to the domain of specific training sites. Landslide susceptibility maps were generated for each radius of influence, ranging from 0 to 300 m in 30 m increments. We observed enhanced FR index values corresponding to reduced exaggeration of statistical anomalies within the proper radius of influence. It is referred that by adopting the radius of influence the classes that not only affect the landslide occurrence from the adjacent areas but also make anomaly errors can be taken into account in FR analysis. Moreover, comparing the FR values between adopting the optimum radius of influence or not, we inferred that the greater the gap, the bigger influence of adjacent areas the classes have. In the validation stage, we identified the optimum radius of influence by measuring the area beneath the relative operating characteristics curve. We found that the optimum radius of influence in the study area is 240 m, for which the LSI map is 5.95 % points more accurate than when not considering the radius of influence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akgun A, Türk N (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis. Environ Earth Sci 61(3):595–611
Choi J, Oh HJ, Lee HJ, Lee C, Lee S (2012) Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS. Eng Geol 124:12–23
Goltz C (1996) Multifractal and entropic properties of landslides in Japan. Geol Rundsch 85:71–84
Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Stark CP (2007) Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslides in central and southern Europe. Meteorol Atmos Phys 98:239–267
Hong SY, Zhang YS, Hyun BK, Sonn YK, Kim YH, Jung SJ, Park CW, Song KC, Jang BC, Choe EY, Lee YJ, Ha SK, Kim MS, Lee JS, Jung GB, Ko BG, Kim GY (2009) An introduction of Korean soil information system. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 45(1):21–28
Jones KE, Preston NJ (2012) Spatial and temporal patterns of off-slope sediment delivery for small catchments subject to shallow landslides within the Waipaoa catchment, New Zealand. Geomorphology 141–142:150–159
Kim KH, Jung HR, Park JH, Ma HS (2011) Analysis on rainfall and geographical characteristics of landslides in Gyeongnam Province. J Korean Environ Restor Technol 14:33–45
Kim HG, Lee DK, Park C, Kil S, Son Y, Park JH (2015) Evaluating landslide hazards using RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. Environ Earth Sci 73:1385–1400
Lee S, Lee M (2005) Detecting landslide location using KOMPSAT 1 and its application to landslide-susceptibility mapping at the Gangneung area, Korea. Adv Space Res 38:2261–2271
Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Envrion Geol 40:1095–1113
Lee S, Ryu JH, Lee MJ, Won JS (2006) The application of artificial neural networks to landslide susceptibility mapping at Janghung, Korea. Math Geol 38(2):199–220
Lee S, Hwang J, Park I (2013) Application of data-driven evidential belief functions to landslide susceptibility mapping in Jinbu, Korea. Catena 100:15–30
Liucci L, Melelli L, Suteanu C (2015) Scale-invariance in the spatial development of landslides in the Umbria Region (Italy). Pure Appl Geophys 172(7):1959–1973
Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2004) Landslide inventories and their statistical properties. Earth Surf Process Landf 29:687–711
Mason SJ, Graham NE (2002) Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: statistical significance and interpretation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 128:2145–2166
Massey CI, Petley DN, McSaveney MJ (2013) Patterns of movement in reactivated landslides. Eng Geol 159:1–19
Oh HJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 37(9):1264–1276
Park S, Choi C, Kim B, Kim J (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 68(5):1443–1464
Petley DN, Mantovani F, Bulmer MH, Zannoni A (2005) The use of surface monitoring data for the interpretation of landslide movement patterns. Geomorphology 66:133–147
Pouduyal CP, Chang C, Oh HJ, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya. Environ Earth Sci 61(5):1049–1064
Pradhan B (2011) Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 63(2):329–349
Reis S, Yalcin A, Atasoy M, Nisanci R, Bayrak T, Erduran M, Sancar C, Ekercin S (2012) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and analytical hierarchy methods in Rize province (NE Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 66:2063–2073
Schleier M, Bi R, Rohn J, Ehret D, Xiang W (2014) Robust landslide susceptibility analysis by combination of frequency ratio, heuristic GIS-methods and ground truth evaluation for a mountainous study area with poor data availability in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, PR China, 71:3007–3023
Shahabi H, Hashim M, Ahmad BB (2015) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and fuzzy logic methods at the central Zab basin, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 73:8647–8668
Suh J, Choi Y, Roh TD, Lee HJ, Park HD (2011) National-scale assessment of landslide susceptibility to rank the vulnerability to failure of rock-cut slopes along expressways in Korea. Environ Earth Sci 63(3):619–632
Suh J, Choi Y, Park HD, Yoon SH, Go WR (2013) Subsidence hazard assessment at the Samcheok Coalfield, South Korea: a case study using GIS. Environ Eng Geosci 19(1):69–83
Ulrich K, Growley BJ, Khattak GA, Owen LA (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region. Geomorphology 101(40):631–642
Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters S (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Haz 30(3):399–419
Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85:274–287
Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides. Comput Geosci 35(6):1125–1138
Yilmaz I (2010) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61(4):821–836
Yilmaz I, Topal T, Süzen ML (2012) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using bivariate statistical analysis in Devrek (Zonguldak-Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 65(7):2161–2178
Yune CY, Chae YK, Paik J, Kim G, Lee SW, Seo HS (2013) Debris flow in metropolitan area—2011 Seoul debris flow. J Mt Sci 10(2):199–206
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by the Brain Korea 21 Plus Project (No. 21A20130012821).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Son, J., Suh, J. & Park, HD. GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Seoul, South Korea, applying the radius of influence to frequency ratio analysis. Environ Earth Sci 75, 310 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5149-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5149-1