Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation-based Performance Evaluation of Skewed Uncontrolled Intersections

  • Published:
International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 19 July 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

This study has developed simulation-based models for evaluating the performance of skewed uncontrolled intersections since the existing models do not consider the effect of skew angle. The calibration parameters for simulating four-legged uncontrolled intersections are suggested. The results indicate that the developed simulation model can predict the capacity and level of service more accurately than the existing Indo-HCM. Moreover, different scenarios were also analysed to study the influence of speed breaker, temporary median, widening, and change in vehicle proportions on capacity. The study also proposes skew-angle-based volume warrants for the capacity of approach roads, which will be helpful for design engineers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data generated or analyzed during this study are provided in full within the published article.

Change history

Abbreviations

Auto:

Auto-rickshaws

B:

Buses

BC:

Big Cars (BC),

CC0:

Standstill Distance

CC1:

Gap Time Distribution

CC2:

Following Distance Oscillation

CC3:

Threshold for Entering Following

CC7:

Oscillation Acceleration

CC8:

Acceleration from Standstill

GA:

Genetic Algorithm

HCM:

Highway Capacity Manual

Indo – HCM:

Indian Highway Capacity Manual

LCV:

Light Commercial Vehicles

LDD:

Lateral Distance Driving

LDS:

Lateral Distance Standing

LOS:

Level of Service

PCU:

Passenger Car Unit

RT:

Right-Turn

SC:

Standard/Small Cars

TAT:

Two/Three Axle Trucks

TH:

Through

TW:

Two-Wheelers

v/c:

Volume to Capacity Ratio

References

  1. Beura, S.K., Srivastava, A., Bhuyan, P.K.: Unsignalized intersection level of service: A bicyclist’s perspective. Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 19, 405–416 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-020-00244-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma, Q., Zeng, H., Wang, Q., Ullah, S.: Traffic optimization methods of urban multi-leg intersections. Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 19, 417–428 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-020-00245-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Highway: capacity manual (HCM) 2010

  4. Prasetijo, J., Ahmad, H.: Capacity analysis of unsignalized intersection under mixed traffic conditions. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 43, 135–147 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dutta, M., Ahmed, M.A.: Review of capacity estimation at unsignalized intersections in the Indian context. In: International Conference on Innovation in Modern Science and Technology. pp. 562–567. Springer (2019)

  6. Prasetijo, J., Pour, M.H., Ghadiri, S.M.R.: Capacity of unsignalized intersections under mixed traffic conditions. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 16, 676–685 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prasetijo, J., Razzaly, W., Wu, N., Ambak, K., Sanik, M.E., Rohani, M.M., Ahmad, H.: Capacity analysis of priority intersections with flare under mixed traffic conditions. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 138, 660–670 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhamaniya, A., Bari, C.S., Patkar, M.: Capacity analysis of urban arterial midblock sections under mixed traffic conditions. Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 20, 409–421 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-022-00298-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bevrani, K., Chung, E.: An examination of the microscopic simulation models to identify traffic safety indicators. Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 10, 66–81 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-011-0042-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dowling, R., Skabardonis, A., Halkias, J., McHale, G., Zammit, G.: Guidelines for calibration of microsimulation models: Framework and applications. Transp. Res. Rec. 1876, 1–9 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3141/1876-01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park, B., Qi, H.: Development and evaluation of a procedure for the calibration of simulation models. Transp. Res. Rec. 1934, 208–217 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193400122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Caliendo, C., Guida, M.: Microsimulation approach for predicting crashes at unsignalized intersections using traffic conflicts. J. Transp. Eng. 138, 1453–1467 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, P., Qu, X., Yu, H., Wang, W., Cao, B.: Development of a VISSIM simulation model for U-turns at unsignalized intersections. J. Transp. Eng. 138, 1333–1339 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamrani, M., Hashemi Esmaeil Abadi, S.M., Rahimpour Golroudbary, S.: Traffic simulation of two adjacent unsignalized T-junctions during rush hours using Arena software. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory. 49, 167–179 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2014.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mueller, J., Claudio, D.: Simulating unsignalized intersection right-of-way. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014. pp. 2092–2100. IEEE (2014)

  16. Ehlert, A., Schneck, A., Chanchareon, N.: Junction parameter calibration for mesoscopic simulation in Vissim. Transp. Res. Procedia. 21, 216–226 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hossain, M.: Estimation of saturation flow at signalised intersections ofdeveloping cities: A micro-simulation modelling approach. Transp. Res. Part. A Policy Pract. 35, 123–141 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00050-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mathew, T.V., Radhakrishnan, P.: Calibration of microsimulation models for nonlane-based heterogeneous traffic at signalized intersections. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 136, 59–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2010)136:1(59)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manjunatha, P., Vortisch, P., Mathew, T.: Methodology for the calibration of VISSIM in mixed traffic. Transp. Res. Board. 92nd Annu. Meet 11 (2013)

  20. Siddharth, S.M.P., Ramadurai, G.: Calibration of VISSIM for indian heterogeneous traffic conditions. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 104, 380–389 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Paul, M., Charan, V., Soni, V., Ghosh, I.: Calibration methodology of microsimulation model for unsignalized intersection under heterogeneous traffic conditions. In: Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies: Energy and Water Infrastructure; Transportation Infrastructure; and Planning and Financing, pp. 618–627. American Society of Civil Engineers Reston, VA (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Dutta, M., Ahmed, M.A.: Calibration of VISSIM models at three-legged unsignalized intersections under mixed traffic conditions. Adv. Transp. Stud. 48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4399/9788255254723

  23. Hourdakis, J., Michalopoulos, P.G., Kottommannil, J.: Practical procedure for calibrating microscopic traffic simulation models. Transp. Res. Rec. 1852, 130–139 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3141/1852-17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arroju, R., Gaddam, H.K., Vanumu, L.D., Ramachandra Rao, K.: Comparative evaluation of roundabout capacities under heterogeneous traffic conditions. J. Mod. Transp. 23, 310–324 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-015-0089-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, K.O., Rilett, L.R.: Simplex-based calibration of traffic microsimulation models with intelligent transportation systems data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1855, 80–89 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3141/1855-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schultz, G.G., Rilett, L.R.: Calibration of distributions of commercial motor vehicles in CORSIM. Transp. Res. Rec. 1934, 246–255 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3141/1934-26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, S.J., Kim, W., Rilett, L.R.: Calibration of microsimulation models using nonparametric statistical techniques. Transp. Res. Rec. 1935, 111–119 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3141/1935-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma, T., Abdulhai, B.: Genetic algorithm-based optimization approach and generic tool for calibrating traffic microscopic simulation parameters. Transp. Res. Rec. 1800, 6–15 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ge, Q., Menendez, M.: An efficient sensitivity analysis approach for computationally expensive microscopic traffic simulation models. Int. J. Transp. 2, 49–64 (2014). https://doi.org/10.14257/ijt.2014.2.2.04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lidbe, A.D., Hainen, A.M., Jones, S.L.: Comparative study of simulated annealing, tabu search, and the genetic algorithm for calibration of the microsimulation model. Simulation. 93, 21–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549716683028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barceló, J., Casas, J., García, D., Perarnau, J.: Methodological notes on combining macro, meso and micro models for transportation analysis. In: Workshop on Modeling and Simulation. pp. 1–40 (2005)

  32. Park, B., Schneeberger, J.D.: Microscopic simulation model calibration and validation: Case study of VISSIM simulation model for a coordinated actuated signal system. Transp. Res. Rec. 1856, 185–192 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3141/1856-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Qin, Y., Dong, H., Zhang, Q., Yang, Y.: Parameter calibration method of microscopic traffic flow simulation models based on orthogonal genetic algorithm. In: 22nd International Conference on Distributed Multimedia Systems (DMS). pp. 55–60 (2016)

  34. Oketch, T., Carrick, M.: Calibration and validation of a micro-simulation model in network analysis. In: Proceedings of the 84th TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2005)

  35. Fellendorf, M., Vortisch, P.: Validation of the microscopic traffic flow model VISSIM in different real-world situations. In: Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting (2001)

  36. Ištoka Otković, I., Tollazzi, T., Šraml, M.: Calibration of microsimulation traffic model using neural network approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 5965–5974 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nyame-Baafi, E., Adams, C.A., Osei, K.K.: Volume warrants for major and minor roads left-turning traffic lanes at unsignalized T-intersections: A case study using VISSIM modelling. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (English Ed. 5, 417–428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2018.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jena, S., Patro, S., Dutta, M., Bhuyan, P.K.: Assessment of service quality at unsignalized intersections using traffic simulation and computational intelligence. Transp. Lett. 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2020.1868179

  39. Aghabayk, K., Sarvi, M., Young, W., Kautzsch, L.: A novel methodology for evolutionary calibration of vissim by multi-threading. In: Australasian Transport Research Forum. pp. 1–15 (2013)

  40. Toledo, T., Ben-Akiva, M.E., Darda, D., Jha, M., Koutsopoulos, H.N.: Calibration of microscopic traffic simulation models with aggregate data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1876, 10–19 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3141/1876-02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Naylor, T.H.: Computer simulation techniques. (1966)

  42. PTV Group: PTV VISSIM 2022 user manual:. (2022)

  43. Indian Highway Capacity Manual (Indo-HCM):. (2017)

  44. Al-Obaedi, J.T.S.: Capacity of median U-turns using traffic simulation. Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 19, 191–198 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-020-00237-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gupta, D.P. (ed.): Indian Roads Congress (IRC), Special Publication. The Indian Roads Congress (IRC), New Delhi (1994). Guidelines for the design of at-grade intersections in rural & urban areas

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express gratitude to the Centre for Transportation Research (CTR), Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Calicut.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors are contributed to the study conception and design. Conceptualization, data collection, data extraction, data analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, software, validation, writing original draft were performed by AAR. Conceptualization, supervision, review and editing were performed by HM and MM. All authors contributed to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. R. Arathi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declares that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arathi, A.R., Harikrishna, M. & Mohan, M. Simulation-based Performance Evaluation of Skewed Uncontrolled Intersections. Int. J. ITS Res. 21, 349–360 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-023-00360-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-023-00360-6

Keywords

Navigation