Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using Community Health Advisors to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness in the Black Belt: a Pilot Study

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disease stage at the time of diagnosis is the most important determinant of prognosis for lung cancer. Despite demonstrated effectiveness of lung cancer screening (LCS) in reducing lung cancer mortality, early detection continues to elude populations with the highest risk for lung cancer death. Consistent with the national rate, current screening rate in Alabama is dismal at 4.2%. While public awareness of LCS may be a likely cause, there are no studies that have thoroughly evaluated current knowledge of LCS within the Deep South. Therefore, we measured LCS knowledge before and after receiving education delivered by community health advisors (CHAs) among high-risk individuals living in medically underserved communities of Alabama and to determine impact of psychological, demographic, health status, and cognitive factors on rate of lung cancer screening participation. Participants were recruited from one urban county and six rural Black Belt counties (characterized by poverty, rurality, unemployment, low educational attainment, and disproportionate lack of access to health services). One hundred individuals (i) aged between 55 and 80 years; (ii) currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years; and (iii) have at least a total of 30-pack-year smoking history were recruited. Knowledge scores to assess lung cancer knowledge were calculated. Paired t-test was used to assess pre- and post-knowledge score improvement. Screening for lung cancer was modeled as a function of predisposed factors (age, gender, insurance, education, fatalism, smoking status, and history of family lung cancer). Average age was 62.94 (SD = 6.28), mostly female (54%); mostly current smokers (53%). Most participants (80.85%) reported no family history of cancer. Fatalism was low, with a majority of the participants disagreeing that a cancer diagnosis is pre-destined (67.7%) and that there are no treatments for lung cancer (88.66%). Overall, lung cancer knowledge increased significantly from baseline of 4.64 (SD = 2.37) to 7.61 (SD = 2.26). Of the 100 participants, 23 underwent screening due to lack of access to primary care providers and reluctance of PCPs to provide referral to LCS. Sixty-five percent of those who were screened reported no family history of lung cancer. Regression analysis revealed no significant association between risk factors and the decision to get screened by participants. Our study demonstrates that while CHA delivered education initiatives increases lung cancer screening knowledge, there are significant structural barriers that prohibit effective utilization of LCS which needs to be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, KD Miller,  Jemal A (2017) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 67(1): 7–30

  2. Fedewa SA et al (2021) State variation in low-dose computed tomography scanning for lung cancer screening in the United States. JNCI: J National Cancer Inst 113(8):1044–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jemal A, Fedewa SA (2017) Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in the United States—2010 to 2015. 3(9):1278–1281

  4. DeSantis CE et al (2016) Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities 66(4):290–308

  5. Alabama Data: Alabama Statewide Cancer Registry (ASCR) (2017) Data years: 2009–2013. Alabama Department of Public Health

  6. CDC, Behavioral risk factor surveillance system (2018)

  7. Levy DT, Romano E, Mumford E (2005) The relationship of smoking cessation to sociodemographic characteristics, smoking intensity, and tobacco control policies. Nicotine Tob Res 7(3):387–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haddad DN et al (2020) Disparities in lung cancer screening: a review. Ann Am Thorac Soc 17(4):399–405

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott AJ, Wilson RF (2011) Social determinants of health among African Americans in a rural community in the Deep South: an ecological exploration. Rural Remote Health 11(1):196–207

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ersek JL et al (2016) Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and use of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening among family physicians. Cancer 122(15):2324–2331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duong DK et al (2017) Patient and primary care provider attitudes and adherence towards lung cancer screening at an academic medical center. Prev Med Rep 6:17–22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter-Harris L, Gould MK (2017) Multilevel barriers to the successful implementation of lung cancer screening: why does it have to be so hard? Ann Am Thorac Soc 14(8):1261–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin MY (2005) Community health advisors effectively promote cancer screening. Ethn Dis 15(2 Suppl 2):S14–S16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carter-Harris L, Davis LL, Rawl SM (2016) Lung cancer screening participation: developing a conceptual model to guide research. Res Theory Nurs Pract 30(4):333–352

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Partridge EE et al (2005) The Deep South Network for cancer control: eliminating cancer disparities through community–academic collaboration. Fam Community Health 28(1):6–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hardy CM et al (2005) African American community health advisors trained as research partners: recruitment and training. Fam Community Health 28(1):28–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Powe BD (1995) Fatalism among elderly African Americans. Effects on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Nursing 18(5):385–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowenstein LM et al (2016) A brief measure of smokers’ knowledge of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. Prev Med Rep 4:351–356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmed AM et al (2022) Training and dissemination of lung cancer education curriculum among community health advisors in the Deep South: a program evaluation. J Cancer Educ :1–7

  20. Harris PA et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Housten AJ et al (2018) Responsiveness of a brief measure of lung cancer screening knowledge. J Cancer Educ 33(4):842–846

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamann HA et al (2018) Multilevel opportunities to address lung cancer stigma across the cancer control continuum. J Thorac Oncol 13(8):1062–1075

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Basu S et al (2019) Association of primary care physician supply with population mortality in the United States, 2005–2015. JAMA Intern Med 179(4):506–514

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis JA et al (2019) Low provider knowledge is associated with less evidence-based lung cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17(4):339–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carter-Harris L et al (2017) Lung cancer screening: what do long-term smokers know and believe? Health Expect 20(1):59–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bergamo C et al (2013) Evaluating beliefs associated with late-stage lung cancer presentation in minorities. J Thorac Oncol 8(1):12–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumya J. Niranjan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix I

LCS12 Participant #: Participant initials:

Lung Cancer Screening in the Deep South

12-item lung cancer screening knowledge measure.

Instructions: Please check mark the most appropriate answer

1. What percentage of lung cancer deaths are caused by smoking?

□ About 70%

□ About 85% *

□ Nearly 100%

□ I don’t know

2. Where does lung cancer rank as a cause of cancer death in the US?

□ #1 cause of cancer deaths *

□ #2 cause of cancer deaths

□ #3 cause of cancer deaths

□ I don’t know

3. When should someone stop being screened for lung cancer? (Check all that apply)

□ You quit smoking more than 15 years ago*

□ Your last CT scans shows you do not have cancer

□ You have other health problems that may shorten your life

□ You are not able or willing to be treated for lung cancer

□ I don’t know

4. How many people with an abnormal CT scan will have lung cancer?

□ Most will have lung cancer

□ About half will have lung cancer

□ Most will not have lung cancer*

□ I don’t know

5. Can a CT scan suggest that you have lung cancer when you do not?

□ Yes*

□ No

□ I don’t know

6. Can a CT scan miss a tumor in your lungs?

□ Yes*

□ No

□ I don’t know

7. Will all tumors found in the lungs grow to be life threatening?

□ Yes

□ No *

□ I don’t know

8. Without screening, is lung cancer often found at a later stage when cure is less likely?

□ Yes *

□ No

□ I don’t know

9. How much does screening for lung cancer with a CT scan lower your chances of dying from lung cancer?

□ About 95%

□ About 50%

□ About 20% *

□ I don’t know

10. Can a CT scan find lung disease that is not cancer?

□ Yes *

□ No

□ I don’t know

11. Can a CT scan find heart disease?

□ Yes *

□ No

□ I don’t know

12. Is radiation exposure one of the harms of lung cancer screening?

□ Yes *

□ No

□ I don’t know

Appendix II

CFS Participant #: Participant initials:

Lung Cancer Screening in the Deep South

CANCER FATALISM SCALE

Please choose and check mark your response to the following statements by indicating whether you Strongly Agree; Agree; Neither Agree nor Disagree (Neutral); Disagree; or Strongly Disagree.

 

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly

Disagree

‘If someone is meant to get cancer, they will get it no matter what they do’

     

If someone has cancer, it is already too late to get treated’

     

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niranjan, S.J., Opoku-Agyeman, W., Hardy, C.M. et al. Using Community Health Advisors to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness in the Black Belt: a Pilot Study. J Canc Educ 38, 1286–1295 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02261-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02261-w

Navigation