Skip to main content
Log in

A collimated detection system for assessing leakage dose from medical linear accelerators at the patient plane

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leakage radiation from linear accelerators can make a significant contribution to healthy tissue dose in patients undergoing radiotherapy. In this work thermoluminescent dosimeters (LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLD chips) were used in a focused lead cone loaded with TLD chips for the purpose of evaluating leakage dose at the patient plane. By placing the TLDs at one end of a stereotactic cone, a focused measurement device is created; this was tested both in and out of the primary beam of a Varian 21-iX linac using 6 MV photons. Acrylic build up material of 1.2 cm thickness was used inside the cone and measurements made with either one or three TLD chips at a given distance from the target. Comparing the readings of three dosimeters in one plane inside the cone offered information regarding the orientation of the cone relative to a radiation source. Measurements in the patient plane with the linac gantry at various angles demonstrated that leakage dose was approximately 0.01 % of the primary beam out of field when the cone was pointed directly towards the target and 0.0025 % elsewhere (due to scatter within the gantry). No specific ‘hot spots’ (e.g., insufficient shielding or gaps at abutments) were observed. Focused cone measurements facilitate leakage dose measurements from the linac head directly at the patient plane and allow one to infer the fraction of leakage due to ‘direct’ photons (along the ray-path from the bremsstrahlung target) and that due to scattered photons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu XG, Bednarz B, Paganetti H et al (2008) A review of dosimetry studies on external-beam radiation treatment with respect to cancer induction. Phys Med Biol 53:R193–R241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor ML et al (2010) Stereotactic fields shaped with a micro-multileaf collimator: systematic characterization of peripheral dose. Phys Med Biol 55:873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaradat AK, Biggs PJ (2007) Measurement of the leakage radiation from linear accelerators in the backward direction for 4, 6, 10, 15 and 18 MV X-ray energies. Health Phys 92(4):387–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor ML, Kron T (2011) Consideration of the radiation dose delivered away from the treatment field to patients in radiotherapy. J Med Phys 36(2):59–71

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor ML, Kron T, Franich RD (2011) Assessment of out-of-field doses in radiotherapy of brain lesions in children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(3):927–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chofor N, Harder D, Willborn KC, Poppe B (2012) Internal scatter, the unavoidable major component of the peripheral dose in photon-beam radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 57(6):1733–1743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fraass BA, van de Geijn J (1983) Peripheral dose from megavolt beams. Med Phys 10(6):809–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benadjaoud M et al (2012) A multi-plane source model for out-of-field head scatter dose calculations in external beam photon therapy. Phys Med Biol 57(22):7725–7739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chofor N, Harder D, Rühmann A, Willborn KC, Wiezorek T, Poppe B (2010) Experimental study on photon-beam peripheral doses, their components and some possibilities for their reduction. Phys Med Biol 55(14):4011–4027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cashmore J (2008) The characterisation of unflattened photon beams from a 6 MV linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol 53(7):1933–1946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kase KR, Svensson GK, Wolbarst AB, Marks MA (1983) Measurement of dose from secondary radiation outside a treatment field. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 9(8):1173–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lonski P, Taylor ML, Kron T, Franich RD (2012) Assessment of leakage dose around the treatment heads of different linear accelerators. Rad Prot Dosim 152(4):304–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kron T (1994) Thermoluminescence dosimetry and its applications in medicine.Part 1: physics, materials and equipment. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 17(4):175–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kron T et al (1998) Dose response of various radiation detectors to synchrotron radiation. Phys Med Biol 43(11):3235–3259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) (2005) Structural shielding design and evaluation for x- and gamma ray radiotherapy facilities. Report No. 151

  16. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (1981) Safety of medical electrical equipment, Part 2: particular requirements for medical electron accelerators in the range 1–50 MeV, Publication 601-2-1. IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  17. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2006) Radiation protection in the design of radiotherapy facilities. Safety Report Series no. 47:23–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, Australia) Project Grant 555240. We would also like to thank Ryan Smith (WBRC Alfred Hospital and RMIT University) for his assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Lonski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lonski, P., Taylor, M.L., Franich, R.D. et al. A collimated detection system for assessing leakage dose from medical linear accelerators at the patient plane. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 37, 15–23 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-013-0235-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-013-0235-8

Keywords

Navigation