Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the appropriate use of QCA in environmental management research: A comment on Hossu et al.

  • Comment
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumgartner, M., and A. Thiem. 2017. Often trusted but never (properly) tested: Evaluating qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research (Online ahead of print).

  • Dressler, Wolfram H., D. Wilson, J. Clendenning, R. Cramb, R. Keenan, S. Mahanty, T.B. Bruun, O. Mertz, and Rodel D. Lasco. 2017. The impact of swidden decline on livelihoods and ecosystem services in Southeast Asia: A review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015. Ambio 46: 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossu, C.A., I.C. Ioja, L.E. Susskind, D.L. Badiu, and A.M. Hersperger. 2018. Factors driving collaboration in natural resource conflict management: Evidence from Romania. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1016-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ide, T. 2018. Does environmental peacemaking between states work? Insights on cooperative environmental agreements and reconciliation in international rivalries. Journal of Peace Research 55: 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, A., and A. Dusa. 2011. Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification. Methodological Innovations Online 6 (2): 103–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Carsten Q., and C. Wagemann. 2012. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thiem, A. 2013. Clearly crisp, and not fuzzy: a reassessment of the (putative) pitfalls of multi-value QCA. Field Methods 25 (2): 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georg Eckert Institute, Celler Str. 3, 38114, Brunswick, Germany

    Tobias Ide

  2. University of Brunswick, Bienroder Weg 97, Brunswick, Germany

    Tobias Ide

Authors
  1. Tobias Ide
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Ide.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 112 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ide, T. On the appropriate use of QCA in environmental management research: A comment on Hossu et al.. Ambio 47, 831–832 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1092-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1092-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation