Skip to main content
Log in

Impact Response and Structural Optimization of CSCS Sandwich Shells Under Vehicle Impact

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, curved steel-concrete-steel (CSCS) shells were employed as protective walls to resist vehicle impact, owing to its high resistance, small deformation and damage found in the former studies. LS-DYNA was employed to numerically study the behaviors of CSCS shells under vehicle impact. Impact force, displacement and internal energy of CSCS shell, displacement of supports and damage contours of concrete were obtained from the FE simulations and discussed in detail. The influences of concrete thickness, steel plate thickness, rise height and impact velocity on the impact response of CSCS shell were also numerically investigated. The results showed that the initial kinetic energy was mainly dissipated through the plastic deformation of the vehicle, and the failure mode was dominated by local deformation. Global deformation only occurred when the CSCS shell was subjected to a high-velocity vehicle impact (i.e., 120 km/h). The comparison between CSCS shell and flat SCS panel subjected to the same vehicle impact showed that the CSCS shell had better performance in terms of higher resistance, smaller deformation and damage level. In order to propose a guideline for designing CSCS shell against vehicle impact, the response surface models for determining displacements of CSCS shell and support were established. Multi-objective optimization method was utilized to obtain the Pareto solution sets between displacement ratio of CSCS shell and vertex displacement of support, as well as between displacement ratio and mass of CSCS shell, which provided the suggestions for the design and application of CSCS shell in protective engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowicz, W., & Jones, N. (1986). Dynamic progressive buckling of circular and square Tubes. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 4, 243–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A., Kim, D., & Cho, S. G. (2013). Modeling of nonlinear cyclic load behavior of I-shaped composite steel-concrete shear walls of nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 45(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F2656-07. (2007). Standard Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers. American Society for Testing and Material.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardakan, M. A., & Rezvan, M. T. (2018). Multi-objective optimization of reliability–redundancy allocation problem with cold-standby strategy using NSGA-II. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 172, 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, R., Agrawal, A. K., Sherif, E. T., Xu, X., & Wong, W. (2019). Heavy truck collision with bridge piers: Computational simulation study. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(6), 04019052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Xiao, Y., Xiao, G., Liu, C., & Agrawal, A. K. (2015). Test and numerical simulation of truck collision with anti-ram bollards. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 75, 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SD-STD-02.01. (1985). Specification for Vehicle Crash Test of Perimeter Barriers and Gates. U.S. Department of State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Do, T. V., Pham, T. M., & Hao, H. (2019). Impact force profile and failure classification of reinforced concrete bridge columns against vehicle impact. Engineering Structures, 183, 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, B., Ivorra, S., Segovia, E., & Irles, R. (2010). Tridimensional modelization of the impact of a vehicle against a metallic parking column at a low speed. Engineering Structures, 32(8), 1986–1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Q., & Zhao, W. (2019). Displacement response of steel-concrete composite panels subjected to impact loadings. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 131, 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallquist, J. O. (2006). LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), Livermore, California

  • Hoff, G. C. (1998). A major research program on steel-concrete-steel sandwich elements. Construction, 174, 37–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z. Y., & Liew, J. Y. R. (2016). Steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite structures subjected to extreme loads. International Journal of Steel Structures, 16(4), 1009–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z. Y., Wang, J. Y., Liew, J. Y. R., & Marshall, P. W. (2015). Lightweight steel–concrete–steel sandwich composite shell subject to punching shear. Ocean Engineering, 102, 146–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H., & Kim, J. (2015). Progressive collapse of steel moment frames subjected to vehicle impact. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 29(6), 04014172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H., & Kim, J. (2017). Response of a steel column-footing connection subjected to vehicle impact. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 63(1), 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew, J. Y. R., Sohel, K. M. A., & Koh, C. G. (2009). Impact tests on steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams with lightweight concrete core. Engineering Structures, 31(9), 2045–2059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specification for vehicle security barriers (2007). London:British Standards Institution.

  • Montague, P. (1975). A simple composite construction for cylindrical shells subjected to external pressure. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 17(2), 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Y. (2007). Users Manual for LS-DYNA Concrete Material Model 159. Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remennikov, A. M., & Kong, S. Y. (2012). Numerical simulation and validation of impact response of axially-restrained steel–concrete–steel sandwich panel. Composite Structures, 94(12), 3546–3555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remennikov, A. M., Kong, S. Y., & Uy, B. (2013). The response of axially restrained non-composite steel–concrete–steel sandwich panels due to large impact loading. Engineering Structures, 49, 806–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saini, D., & Shafei, B. (2019). Performance of concrete-filled steel tube bridge columns subjected to vehicle collision. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(8), 04019074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SD-STD-02.01, & America (2003). Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers and Gates, Revision A. U.S. Department of State.

  • Sharma, H., Hurlebaus, S., & Gardoni, P. (2012). Performance-based response evaluation of reinforced concrete columns subject to vehicle impact. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 43, 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohel, K. M. A., & Liew, J. Y. R. (2014). Behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich slabs subject to impact load. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 100, 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohel, K. M. A., Liew, J. Y. R., & Koh, C. G. (2015). Numerical modelling of lightweight steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite beams subjected to impact. Thin-Walled Structures, 94, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L., & Du, B. (2015). Research on performances of reinforced concrete column under vehicle impact. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 31(1), 1–10. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Liew, J. Y. R., & Lee, S. C. (2015). Theoretical models for axially restrained steel-concrete-steel sandwich panels under blast loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 76, 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Zhai, X., Lee, S. C., & Wang, W. (2016). Responses of curved steel-concrete-steel sandwich shells subjected to blast loading. Thin-Walled Structures, 108, 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Liew, J. Y. R., & Lee, S. C. (2016). Ultimate strength of steel–concrete–steel sandwich panels under lateral pressure loading. Engineering Structures, 115, 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, C., Wang, Y., Zhai, X., Meng, L., & Zhou, H. (2019). Experimental study on curved steel-concrete-steel sandwich shells under concentrated load by a hemi-spherical head. Thin-Walled Structures, 137, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, C., Wang, Y., & Zhai, X. (2020). Low velocity impact performance of curved steel-concrete-steel sandwich shells with bolt connectors. Thin-Walled Structures, 150, 106672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, C., Wang, Y., Zhai, X., & Meng, L. (2020). Strength assessment of curved steel-concrete-steel sandwich shells with bolt connectors under concentrated load. Engineering Structures, 212, 110465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, W., Guo, Q., Zhao, W., & Guo, Q. (2018). Experimental study on impact and post-impact behavior of steel-concrete composite panels. Thin-Walled Structures, 130, 405–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, W., Guo, Q., Dou, X., Zhou, Y., & Ye, Y. (2018). Impact response of steel-concrete composite panels: Experiments and FE analyses. Steel and Composite Structures, 26(3), 255–263.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper is financially supported by the Funds for Creative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51921006), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. FRFCU5710051919) and Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Fund (Grant No.: LBH-Q21099 and LBH-TZ1014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ximei Zhai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, C., Wang, Y. & Zhai, X. Impact Response and Structural Optimization of CSCS Sandwich Shells Under Vehicle Impact. Int J Steel Struct 23, 292–315 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-022-00695-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-022-00695-y

Keywords

Navigation