Skip to main content
Log in

Spot form of net blotch suppression and yield of barley in response to fungicide application in the Wimmera region of Victoria, Australia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spot form of net blotch (SFNB), caused by Pyrenophora teres f. maculata caused up to 25 % (0.9 t/ha) grain yield loss to barley and significant reductions in grain quality parameters such as retention (13 %), screenings (5 %) and grain weight (6 %) in the Wimmera region of Victoria during 2005–11. Spot form of net blotch was suppressed by varying degrees between experiments, seasons, and crop growth stages when foliar fungicide (propiconazole) was applied. Of single applications, treatment at the stem elongation (Z31) or flag leaf (Z39) growth stages generally provided the greatest disease suppression. Single application at tillering (Z25) or ear emergence (Z55) were generally ineffective. Eight chemical seed treatments registered for use in barley were tested as potential low cost management options for SFNB. Four seed treatments reduced SFNB severity in the glasshouse, but none were effective in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carmona MA, Barreto DE, Reis EM (1999) Detection, transmission and control of drechslera teres in barley seed. Seed Sci Technol 27:761–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Deadman ML, Cooke BM (1989) An analysis of rain-mediated dispersal of drechslera teres conidia in field plots of spring barley. Annals of Applied Biology 115:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entz MH, van den Berg CGJ, Lafond GP, Stobbe EH, Rossnagel BG, Austenson HM (1990) Effect of late-season fungicide application on grain yield and seed size distribution in wheat and barley. Can J Plant Sci 70:699–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasena KW, Loughman R, Majewski J (2002) Evaluation of fungicides in control of spot-type net blotch on barley. Crop Prot 21:63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasena KW, van Burgel A, Tanaka K, Mejewski J, Loughman R (2007) Yield reduction in barley in relation to spot-type net blotch. Australas Plant Pathol 36:429–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan TN (1989) Effect of spot-type net blotch (drechslera teres (sacc.) shoem) infection on barley yield in short season environment of northern cereal belt of Western Australia. Aust J Agric Res 40:745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RA (1985) Disease progression and yield loss in barley associated with net blotch, as influenced by fungicide seed treatment. Can J Plant Pathol 7:83–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLean MS, Howlett BJ, Hollaway GJ (2009) The epidemiology and control of spot form of net blotch (pyrenophora teres f. maculate) of barley: a review. Crop & Pasture Science 60:303–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mclean MS, Howlett BJ, Hollaway GJ (2010) Spot form of net blotch, caused by pyrenophora teres f. maculata, is the most prevalent foliar disease of barley in Victoria, Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 39:46–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean MS, Howlett BJ, Turkington TK, Platz GJ, Hollaway GJ (2012) Spot form of net blotch resistance in a diverse set of barley lines in Australia and Canada. Plant Dis 96:569–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neher DA, Reynolds KL, Campbell CL (1997) Analysis of disease progress curves using linear models (Ed. LJ francl and DA neher). The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, pp. 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole NF, Arnaudin ME (2014) The role of fungicides for effective disease management in cereal crops. Can J Plant Pathol 36:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton JC, Steele P (1983) Effects of seed and foliar fungicides on progress of net blotch and yield in barley. Can J Plant Sci 63:631–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallwork H, Lichon A, Sivanesan A (1992) Pyrenophora hordei-a new ascomycete with drechslera anamorph affecting barley in Australia. Mycol Res 96:1068–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg CGJ, Rossnagel BG (1990) Effect of tilt on severity of spot-type net blotch, grain yield and yield components in barley. Can J Plant Sci 70:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg CGJ, Rossnagel BG (1991) Epidemiology of spot-type net blotch on spring barley in Saskatchewan. Phytopathology 81:1446–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousfi BE, Ezzahiri B (2002) Net blotch in semi-arid regions of morrocco ll: yield and yield-loss modelling. Field Crop Res 73:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Grains Research and Development Corporation and the Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources for support and funding. We thank Kevin Pymer at Wonwondah for providing field sites. Graham Exell, Jonathan Bretag, Peter Donaldson, Sharyn Andrews, Dennis Ward and David Hoffmann for technical assistance. We also thank Geoff Robertson (Bayer), Chemtura, Hamish Mines (Cropcare) and Neville Marra (Syngenta) for providing seed treatments. Lastly we thank Jenny Smith for assistance with data collation and statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. McLean.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLean, M.S., Weppler, R., Howlett, B.J. et al. Spot form of net blotch suppression and yield of barley in response to fungicide application in the Wimmera region of Victoria, Australia. Australasian Plant Pathol. 45, 37–43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-015-0387-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-015-0387-y

Keywords

Navigation