Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality in early childhood education and care: a case study of disadvantage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large numbers of young children spend significant amounts of time in early childhood educational settings. Concerns about the quality of this experience have increased substantially in recent years. Further, as social inequalities in Australia continue to grow the gap between disadvantage and advantage widens despite overall levels of increased economic prosperity. Provision of quality early childhood education may be one important way to address disadvantage as international studies show that high quality early childhood education experience contributes to reducing inequality later in life. This study investigated the relationship between quality and disadvantage in a childcare centre in urban Australia. Employing a case study approach, building on Bronfenbrenner’s theory and previous literature, the study found that four key components affected the quality of childcare in this centre—physical environment, staff–child interaction, curriculum/program and family support. Importantly, staff knowledge and dedication were crucial to achieving quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2001). Census of population and housing—Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas in 2001 (SEIFA). Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Productivity Commission. (2008). Report on government services 2008. Canberra: Australian Government. Retrieved August 18, 2009, from http://www.pc.gov.au/gsp/reports/rogs/2008.

  • Berk, L. E. (2006). Child development (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, J. M., & Hayes, A. (2004). Context and consequences: Impact on children, families and communities. In J. M. Bowes (Ed.), Children, families, communities: Contexts, consequences (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological system theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development: A research annual (Vol. 6, pp. 187–249). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging theoretical models, research designs, and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(2), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology volume 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 535–584). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, M. R., & Cryer, D. (2003). Diversity, child care quality and developmental outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 401–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchinal, M. R., Roberts, J. E., Riggins, R., Zaisei, S. A., Neebe, E., & Bryant, D. (2000). Relating quality of centre-based child care to early cognitive and language development longitudinally. Child Development, 71(2), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (1987). In search of consistencies in child care research. In D. A. Phillips (Ed.), Quality in child care: What does research tell us? Washington, DC: National Association for the education of Young Children.

  • Clarke-Stewart, A., & Allhusen, V. D. (2005). What we know about childcare. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments. (2009). National partnership agreement on early childhood education. Canberra: COAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Community Services: DoCS. (2004). Children’s Services Regulation NSW 2004. Retrieved February 2, 2007, from http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/fullhtml/inforce/subordleg+260+2004+FIRST+0+N.

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations: DEEWR. (2008). The Office of Early Childhood Education and Child Care. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://www.oececc.gov.au/default.htm.

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations: DEEWR. (2009). Supporting the development of young children in Australia: 2009. A snapshot. Retrieved July 29, 2009, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/EarlyChildhood/Policy_Agenda/Documents/DEEWR_Snapshot_09%20web.pdf.

  • Dowsett, C. J., Huston, A. C., Imes, A. E., & Gennetian, L. (2008). Structural and process features in three types of child care for children from high and low income families. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. (2004). Where to now for early childhood education and care? Research Developments, 12(Summer).

  • Elliott, A. (2006). Early childhood education: Pathways to quality and equity for all children. Australian Education Review. Sydney: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, R. E., & Laumann-Billings, L. (1998). An overview of the nature, causes, and consequences of abusive family relationships: Toward differentiating maltreatment and violence. American Psychologist, 53(2), 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (2000). An early childhood research agenda: Voices from the field. Research Fellow 2000. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

  • Fontaine, N., Torre, D. L., & Grafwallner, R. (2006). Effects of quality early care on school readiness skills of children at risk. Early Child Development and Care, 176(1), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, K., Homel, R., & Lamb, C. (2007). The pervasive impact of poverty on children: Tacking family adversity and promoting child development through the pathways to prevention project. In A. France & R. Homel (Eds.), Pathways and crime prevention: Theory, policy and practice. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.

  • Hart, B., & Risky, T. R. (1992). American parenting of language-learning children: Persisting differences in family–child interactions observed in natural home environments. Developmental Psychology, 28(6), 1096–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R., et al. (2008). Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievement in pre-Kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishimine, K. (2009). Quality and early childhood: The impact on children’s social skills. Saarbrucken: VDM Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishimine, K., & Evans, D. (2007). Quality of childcare and the impact on children’s social skills in disadvantaged areas of Australia. In A. France & R. Homel (Eds.), Pathways and crime prevention: Theory, policy and practice. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.

  • Ishimine, K., Tayler, C., & Thorpe, K. (2009). Accounting for quality in Australian childcare: A dilemma for policy makers. Journal of Education Policy, 24(6), 717–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E., Christie, J. F., & Wardle, F. (2005). Play, development and early education. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, L. A., Kilburn, M. R., & Cannon, J. S. (2005). Early childhood interventions: Proven results, future promise. Rand, CA: Santa Monica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korat, O. (2005). Contextual and non-contextual knowledge in emergent literacy development: A comparison between children from low SES and middle SES communities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(2), 220–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, C. (1997). The effect of environmental variations in day care centres on the developmental of young children in Singapore. (Doctoral dissertation, University of London). London: British Thesis Service.

  • Lee, S., Bartolic, S., & Vanderwater, E. A. (2009). Predicting children’s media use in the USA: Differences in cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarian, O., Bryant, D., et al. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic. Language and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, B. W. (1990). An ecological perspective on individual human development. Early Child Development and Care, 55, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, F. J., Bachman, H. J., & Connor, C. M. (2005). Improving literacy in America: Guidelines from research. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (1994). Defining quality: Values, stakeholders and processes. In P. Moss & A. Pence (Eds.), Valuing quality in early childhood services: New approaches to defining quality. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Childcare Accreditation Council: NCAC. (2006a). Quality improvement and accreditation system: Handbook (4th ed.). Surry Hills: NCAC Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Childcare Accreditation Council: NCAC. (2006b). National Childcare Accreditation Council Quality Improvement and Quality Trends Report, Retrieved July 24, 2008, from http://www.ncac.gov.au/reports_statistics/past_reports.asp#qtr.

  • Occupational Health and Safety Act. (2000). Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.workcover.new.gov.au/LawAndPolocy/Acts/ohsact.htm.

  • Office of Early Childhood Education and Child Care: OECECC. (2010). State of Child Care in Australia. Canberra: OECECC. Retrieved April 29, 2010, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/EarlyChildhood/OECECC/Pages/home.aspx.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: OECD. (2001). OECD country note: Early Childhood Education and Care Policy in Australia. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation, Development: OECD. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1987). Child-care quality and children’s social development. Developmental Psychology, 23(4), 537–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punch, K. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raban, B. (2000). Just the beginning…Inaugural DETYA Research Fellow 1999–2000. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Ramey, C. T., Campbell, F. A., Burchinal, M. R., Bryant, D. M., Wasik, B. H., Skinner, M. L., & Gardner, D. M. (1999). Early learning, later success: The Abecedarian Study. Retrieved May 24, 2007, from http://www.fpg.unc.edu/products/product_detail.cfm?apubsID=37.

  • Raviv, T., Kessenich, M., & Morrison, F. J. (2004). A mediational model of the association between socio-economic status and three-year-old language abilities: The role of parenting factors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 528–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, S., & Prior, M. (2005). Childhood today. In S. Richardson & M. Prior (Eds.), No time to lose: The wellbeing of Australia’s children. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

  • Santrock, J. W. (2008). Educational psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. (1998). American childcare today. American Psychologist, 53(2), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1997). The High/Scope preschool curriculum comparison study through age 23. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk, J. S., Sessa, F. M., Morris, A. S., Steinberg, L., & Avenevoli, S. (2004). Neighborhood cohesion as a buffer against hostile maternal parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2004). Quality teaching in the early years. In A. Anning, J. Cullen, & M. Fleer (Eds.), Early childhood education: Society and culture. London: Sage.

  • Smart, D., Sanson, A., Baxter, J., Edwards, B., & Hayes, A. (2009). Home to school transitions for financially disadvantaged children. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Retrieved August 19, 2009, from http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/papers/2009/smart.pdf.

  • Stanley, F. M., Richardson, S., & Prior, M. (2005). Children of the lucky country?: How Australian society has turned its back on children and why children matter. Sydney: Pan Macmillan Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streisand, R., & Michaelidis, T. (2007). Assessment in pediatric health. In S. R. Smith & L. Handler (Eds.), The clinical assessment of children and adolescents: A practitioner’s handbook. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2004). The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project: Final Report: A longitudinal study funded by the DfES 1997–2004. Retrieved from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/SSU_FR_2004_01.pdf.

  • Tayler, C., Tennent, L., Farrell, A., & Gahan, D. (2002). Use and integration of early childhood services: Insights from an inner city community. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 9(1), 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinovskis, M. A. (2005). The birth of Head Start: Preschool education policies in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Votruba-Drzal, E., Coley, R. L., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2004). Childcare and low-income children’s development: Direct and moderated effects. Child Development, 75(1), 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltz, N., & Klein, E. (2001). What do you do in child care? Children’s perceptions of high and low quality classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16(2), 209–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ARC Postdoctoral Fellow Industry, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Karin Ishimine

Authors
  1. Karin Ishimine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Ishimine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishimine, K. Quality in early childhood education and care: a case study of disadvantage. Aust. Educ. Res. 38, 257–274 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-011-0028-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-011-0028-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation