Skip to main content
Log in

A Robust Sharpe Ratio

  • Published:
Sankhya B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sharpe ratio is one of the widely used measures in the financial literature to compare two or more investment strategies. Since it is a ratio of the excess expected return of a portfolio to its standard deviation of returns, it is not robust against the presence of outliers. In this paper we propose a modification of the Sharpe ratio which is based on robust measures of location and scale. We investigate the properties of this proposed ratio under six alternative return distributions. It is seen that the modified Sharpe ratio performs better than the original Sharpe ratio in the presence of outliers. A real life stock market return data set is analyzed and the comparative performances of the two ratios are studied. The results indicate that modified Sharpe ratio may be a better measure for comparing different investment strategies. When downside risk is the only concern of the investors a modification of the Sharpe ratio known as Sortino ratio is often used. It is shown that the Sortino ratio is not robust and we propose a modified version of the same which is robust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bao, Y. and Ullah, A. (2006). Moments of the estimated Sharpe ratio when the observations are not IID. Financ. Res. Lett. 3, 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, A. and Johnson, H.L. (2008). The efficacy of the Sortino ratio and other benchmarked performance measures under skewed return distributions. Aust. J. Manag.32, Special Issue.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, H. (1946). Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Asia Publishing House.

  • Falk, M. (1997). Asymptotic independence of median and MAD. Statist. Probab. Lett. 34, 341–345.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, F.R. (1974). The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69, 383–393.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, F.R., Ronchetti, E.M., Rousseeuw, P.J. and Stahel, W.A. (1986). Robust Statistics: the Approach Based on Influence Functions. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. (1964). Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann. Math. Stat.35, 73–101.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. (1965). A robust version of probability ratio test. Ann. Math. Stat. 36, 1753–1758.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. (1968). Robust confidence limits. Z.Wahrsch. verw.Geb. 10, 269–278.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. (1981). Robust Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jobson, J.D. and Korkie, B.M. (1981). Performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe and Treynor measures. J. Financ. 36, 889–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. and Satchell, S. (2005). A re-examination of Sharpe’s ratio for log-normal prices. Applied Mathematical Finance 12, 1, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M. (2008). Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio. J. Empir. Financ. 15, 850–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, A.W. (2002). The statistics of Sharpe ratios. Financ. Anal. J. 58, 4, 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marona, R.A., Martin, R.D. and Yohai, V.J. (2006). Robust Statistics: Theory and Methods. Wiley, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsaglia, G. (1965). Ratios of normal variables and ratios of sums of uniform variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60, 193–204.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marsagila, G. (2006). Ratios of normal variables. J. Stat. Softw. 16, 4.

  • Miller, R.E. and Gehr, K.A. (1978). Sample size bias and sharpe’s performance measure: a note. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 13, 943–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, L.T. and Vassalou, M. (2004). Sharpe ratios and alphas in continuous time. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 39, 1, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdyke, J.D. (2007). Comparing Sharpe Ratios: So Where are the p-values?. J. Asset Manag. 8.

  • Pinar, M.C. (2016). On robust mean-variance portfolios. Optimization 65, 1039–1048.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Perold, A.F. (2004). The capital asset pricing model. J. Econ. Perspect. 8, 3, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P.J. (1981). A new infinitesimal approach to robust estimation. Zeitschrift fuer Wahrscheinlichkeit und Verwandte Gebiete. 56, 127–132.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A.D. (1952). Safety first and the holdings of assets. Econometrika 20, 3, 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serfling, R.J. (2002). Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F. (1966). Mutual funds performance. Journal of Business (January), 119–138.

  • Sortino, F.A. and Van der Meer, R. (1991). Downside risk. The Journal of Portfolio Management Summer, 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudte, R.G. and Sheather, S.J. (1990). Robust Estimation and Tests. Wiley, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1960). A Survey of Sampling from Contaminated Distributions. In: Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, (I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow and H. B. Mann, eds.) Stanford University Press, p. 448–485.

  • Wilcox, R.R. (2012). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments which has led to substantial improvement of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahesh K.C.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

K.C, M., Laha, A.K. A Robust Sharpe Ratio. Sankhya B 83, 444–465 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13571-019-00204-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13571-019-00204-y

Keywords and phrases

AMS (2000) subject classification

Navigation