Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of gasoline engine emission parameters employing commercial and sucrolite-catalyst coated converter using response surface methodology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 February 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

This study aims to optimize the engine parameters using response surface methodology to achieve fewer pollutants in the exhaust of a spark-ignition engine mounted with a commercial catalytic converter and a modified catalytic converter. In this research, a sucrose-doped alumina was used as a catalyst as a novel technique to reduce the harmful pollutants present in the exhaust gas. The experiment allowed exhaust gas to pass axially through the converters. The experimental parameters employed were used to develop a numerical model to predict emission levels concerning catalytic converters. The numerical model was developed using brake power, actual to the theoretical air–fuel ratio, and engine exhaust gas pollutants measured before being treated by the catalytic converter as input variables, and primary toxic pollutants treated by the catalytic converters output parameters. The developed model showed superior performance, with higher R2 values over 0.987 for all cases. The experimental results validated the predicted optimum responses, and the measured error percentage was less than 3% for most cases. The optimized parameters yielded a desirability factor of 0.831 for the commercial catalytic converter and 0.9 for the modified catalytic converter. Thus, the developed response surface methodology model can highly predict the emission characteristics.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Abbreviations

ACC:

After catalytic converter

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

BP:

Brake power

bsfc:

Brake specific fuel consumption

BTE:

Brake thermal efficiency

CO:

Carbon monoxide

CCC:

Commercial catalytic converter

EGT:

Exhaust gas temperature

Eq.:

Equation

HC:

Hydrocarbon

NOx :

Nitrogen oxides

rpm:

Revolution per minute

RSM:

Response surface methodology

SCC:

Sucrose-alumina catalytic converter

Vol:

Volume

WCC/CO:

Carbon monoxide level coming out from the engine before treated with any catalytic converter

WCC/HC:

Hydrocarbon level coming out from the engine before treated with any catalytic converter

WCC/NOx :

Nitrogen oxide level coming out from the engine before treated with any catalytic converter

CCC/CO:

CO level after treated with CCC

CCC/HC:

HC level after treated with CCC

CCC/NOx :

NOx level after treated with CCC

SCC/CO:

CO level after treated with SCC

SCC/HC:

HC level after treated with SCC

SCC/NOx :

NOx level after treated with SCC

λ:

Actual to the theoretical air–fuel ratio

R 2 :

Correlation coefficient

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Suresh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Jun Yang.

The original online version of this article was revised to correct the article title.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sathyanarayanan, S., Suresh, S., Uslu, S. et al. Optimization of gasoline engine emission parameters employing commercial and sucrolite-catalyst coated converter using response surface methodology. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 1725–1738 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-03968-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-03968-5

Keywords

Navigation