Skip to main content
Log in

Water Use Efficiency in Milk Production of Selected Dairy Breeds in Central Region of Bihar: A Lifetime Analysis

  • FULL-LENGTH RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water is one of the critical resources in livestock production system. Water footprint or water use efficiency for milk production can provide a perceptive nexus between water consumption and milk production. Cattle and buffalo breeds are having different water requirement over the lifetime and according to the availability of the water resource a breed can be preferred in a region. Primary data were collected for 180 animals of different age group from the selected breeds (Graded Sahiwal, Holstein–Friesian cross and Graded Murrah) using pre-structured interview schedule. Total water use was calculated by adding direct and indirect water use by the animals. Water requirement for Graded Sahiwal (12,080 m3/animal) was found 1.09 times and 1.20 times less than crossbred (13,216 m3/animal) and Graded Murrah (14,548 m3/animal), respectively, despite its longer herd life. Water use efficiency (WUE) for whole lifetime was estimated and it was found that WUE was the highest for crossbred cow (1.48 L/m3) followed by Graded Sahiwal (1.04 L/m3), and Graded Murrah (0.76 L/m3). It was due to the higher Life time Milk Yield in crossbred cow in comparison with Graded Sahiwal and Graded Murrah. It can be concluded that though the lifetime water requirement was the lowest for Graded Sahiwal but WUE of crossbred was the highest among the selected breeds due to higher lifetime milk production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amarasinghe UA, Sharma BR, Aloysius N, Scott C, Smakhtin V, de Fraiture C (2005) Spatial variation of water supply and demand across river basins of India. In: Research report 83, International Water Management Institute, Colombo

  2. Amarasinghe UA, Shah T, Turral H, Anand BK (2007) India’s water future to 2025–2050: business-as-usual scenario and deviations. In: Research report 13, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, p 47

  3. Amarasinghe UA, Shah T, Smakhtin V (2010) Water-milk nexus in India: a path to a sustainable water future? Int J Agric Sustain 10(1):93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhalla GS, Hazell P, Kerr J (1999) Prospects of India’s cereal supply and demand to 2020. In: Food, agriculture, and the environment discussion paper 29, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

  5. Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY (2003) Virtual water flows between nations in relation to trade in livestock and livestock products. UNESCO-Institute for Water Education. Accessed from 24 Jul 2021. https://www.google.com/search?q=Virtual+water+flows+between+nations+in+relation+to+trade+in+livestock+and+livestock+products+a+k+chapaign&rlz=1C1CHBD_enIN932IN932&oq=Virtual+water+flows+between+nations+in+relation+to+trade+in+livestock+and+livestock+products+a+k+chapaign&aqs=chrome..69i57.7918j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

  6. Dyson T, Hanchate A (2000) India’s demographic and food prospects: state level analysis. Econ Polit Wkly 35(46):4021–4036

    Google Scholar 

  7. Economic Survey (2021–22). Ministry of finance, Government of India

  8. Gosain AK, Rao S, Basuray D (2006) Climate change impact assessment on hydrology of Indian river basins. Curr Sci 90(3):346–353

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harika R, Pandey D, Sharma A, Sirohi S (2015) Water footprint of milk production in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Dairy Sci 68(4):384–389

    Google Scholar 

  10. Janardhan BS (2012) Water requirement and water footprint analysis of Cattle and Buffalo milk. Accessed from. NDRI OPAC database (87393)

  11. Kar G, Rao KV, Upadhyay RC, Muralidhar M, Islam A, Ambsat SK, Sikka AK, Kumar A (2016) Manual on water foot print computation in agriculture (crop, livestock and fisheries). Publication no.76, ICAR-Indian Institute of Water Management, Bhubaneswar

  12. Lardy G, Stoltenow C, Johnson R (2008) Livestock and water. North Dakota State University, Fargo. Accessed from 14 Jun 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10365/5359

  13. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AM (2012) A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystem 15:401–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rijsberman FR (2000) World water scenarios: analysis. Earthscan publications, London, p 396

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rosegrant MW, Cai X, Cline SA (2002) World water and food 2025. Dealing with scarcity. In: International food policy research institute, Washington D.C., pp 45–47

  16. Seckler D, Amarasinghe UA, Molden D, de Silva R, Barker R (1998) World water demand and supply 1995 to 2025: scenarios and issues. In: Research report 19, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, p 15

  17. Singh OP, Sharma A, Singh R, Shah T (2004) Virtual water trade in dairy economy irrigation water productivity in Gujarat. Econ Polit Wkly 39(31):3492–3497

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singh JP, Mandal LN, Sinha SK, Mishra SN, Kumari A, Kumar S, Jha AK, Gebru G, Negussie K, Bahta S, Reddy BV, Ravichandran T, de Haan N (2018) The Bihar livestock sector analysis. Government of Bihar, Patna

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smita S, Pandey D, Sohan VS, Shradha S, Upadhyay RC (2013) Water footprint of cattle and buffalo milk production. In: National training book of climate resilient livestock and production system, p 213

  20. Water and Related Statistics (2021) Central Water Commission. Department of water resources, RD and GR, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the financial assistance received in the form of JRF fellowship from ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal during the course of study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author confirms contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design were contributed by BSC, AK; data collection was contributed by AK; analysis was contributed by AK; interpretation of result was contributed by AK, BSC, AKD, AS; draft manuscript preparation was contributed by AK, BSC. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhinandan Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Chandel, B.S., Dixit, A.K. et al. Water Use Efficiency in Milk Production of Selected Dairy Breeds in Central Region of Bihar: A Lifetime Analysis. Agric Res 12, 339–345 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-023-00655-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-023-00655-w

Keywords

Navigation