Abstract
In the present paper, we suggest the generalized classes of efficient estimators for finite population mean estimation in two-phase sampling if non-response and measurement errors are simultaneously present. For each generalized class of estimators, the expressions for the bias and mean square error have been derived to compare the performance of the proposed generalized classes of estimators with some modified estimators in two-phase sampling including modified ratio-type estimator, modified exponential-type ratio estimator, and modified generalized estimator. A simulation study based on different simulated populations by changing the correlation between the auxiliary variable and the study variable is carried out to illustrate the performance of the proposed generalized classes of estimators by changing the correlation from low to high. Finally, it is shown that the proposed generalized class of estimators performs better than the aforementioned modified estimators when correlation is moderate or high.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Thomsen I (1973) A note on the efficiency of weighting subclass means to reduce the effects of nonresponse when analyzing survey data. Statist Tidskrift 11:278–285
Brick JM (2013) Unit nonresponse and weighting adjustments: A critical review. J Off Statist 29(3):329–353
Olson K, Kennedy C (2006) Examination of the relationship between nonresponse and measurement error in a validation study of alumni. In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, Seattle, WA, pp 4181–4188.
Hansen MH, Hurwitz WN (1946) The problem of non-response in sample surveys. J AM Stat Assoc 41:517–529
Tabasum R, Khan IA (2004) Double sampling for ratio estimation with non- response. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 58:300–306
Tabasum R, Khan IA (2006) Double sampling for ratio estimator for the population mean in presence of non-response. Assam Statist Rev 20:73–83
Riaz S, Diana G, Shabbir J (2014) Improved classes of estimators for population mean in presence of non-response. Pak J Stat 30(1):83–100
Sanaullah A, Noor-ul-amin M, Hanif M (2015) Generalized exponential-type ratio-cum-ratio and product-cum-product estimators for population mean in the presence of non-response under stratified two-phase random sampling. Pak J Stat 31(1):71–94
Yaqub M, Shabbir J (2016) Estimation of population distribution function in the presence of non-response. Hacet J Math Stat 47(2):471–511
Ahmed S, Shabbir J, Gupta S (2016) Use of scrambled response model in estimating the finite mean in presence of non-response when coefficient of variation is known. Commun Stat Theory Methods 46:8435–8449
Riaz S, Darda AM (2016) Some classes of estimators in the presence of non-response using auxiliary attribute. J Stat Theory Pract 5:1271
Muneer S, Shabbir J, Khalil A (2018) A generalized exponential type estimator of population mean in the presence of non-response. Stat Transit New Series 19(2):259–276
Shabbir J, Gupta S, Ahmed S (2018) A generalized class of estimators under two-phase stratified sampling for non-response. Commun Stat Theory Methods 48:3761–3777
Sanaullah A, Noor-ul-amin M, Hanif M, Koyuncu N (2018) Generalized exponential-type estimators for population mean taking two auxiliary variables for unknown means in stratified sampling with sub-sampling the non-respondents. Int J Appl Comp Math Sci 4:56
Saleem I, Sanaullah A, Hanif M (2018) A generalized class of estimators for estimating population mean in the presence of non-response. J Stat Theory Appl 17(4):32–40
Hidiroglou, M, Estevao V (2013) Dealing with nonresponse using follow-up. In: Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings-Section on Survey Research Methods, ASA. Alexandria, Virginia, USA: American Statistical Association pp 1478–1489.
Hidiroglou M, Drew JD, Gray GB (1993) A framework for measuring and reducing nonresponse in surveys. Surv Methodol 19(1):81–84
Aubry P, Guillemain M (2019) Attenuating the nonresponse bias in hunting bag surveys: The multiphase sampling strategy. PLoS One 14(3):e0213670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal
Singh HP, Karpe N (2010) Estimation of mean, ratio and product using auxiliary information in the presence of measurement errors in sample surveys. J Stat Theory Pract 4(1):111–136
Diana T, Giordan M (2012) Finite population variance estimation in presence of measurement error. Commun Stat Theory and Methods 41:402–431
Shukla D, Pathak S, Thakur NS (2012) An estimator for mean estimation in presence of measurement error. Res Rev J Off Stat 1(1):1–8
Masood S, Shabbir J (2016) Generalized multi-phase regression-type estimators under the effect of measuemnent error to estimate the population variance. Hacet J Math and Stat 45(4):1297–1306
Khalil S, Gupta S, Hanif M (2018) A generalized estimator for finite population mean in the presence of measurement errors in stratified sampling. J Stat Theory Pract 12(2):311–324
Azeem M (2014) On estimation of population mean in the presence of measurement error and non-response. Unpublished PhD thesis, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, Pakistan.
Kumar S, Bhougal S, Nataraja NS (2015) Estimation of population mean in the presence of non-response and measurement error. Rev Colomb Estad 38(1):145–161
Kumar S (2016) Improved estimation of population mean in presence of non-response and measurement error. J Stat Theory Pract 10(4):707–720
Azeem M, Hanif M (2017) Joint influence of measurement error and non-response on estimation of population mean. Commun Stat Theory Methods 46(4):1679–1693
Irfan M, Javed M, Lin Z (2018) Optimized estimation for population mean using conventional and non-conventional measures under the joint influence of measurement error and non-response. J Stat Comput Sim 88(12):2385–2403
Zahid E, Shabbir J (2018) Estimation of population mean in the presence of measurement error and non-response under stratified random sampling. PLoS One 13(2):e0191572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191572
Sabir S, Sanaullah A (2019) A note on Kumar (2016): improved estimation of population mean in the presence of measurement error and non-response. J Stat Theory Pract 13:25
National Research Council (2013) Nonresponse in social science surveys: A research agenda. In: Tourangeau R, Plewes TJ (eds) Panel on a research agenda for the future of social science data collection, committee on national statistics. Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: (Description on Different Simulated Populations used for Simulation Results)
X is assumed to follow a normal distribution in each of the three different simulated populations, and Y is simulated using the model \(Y = \beta_{yx} X + e\); further description of population parameters is shown separately for each population.
-
Simulated Population 1:
\(X \sim N\left( {0.5,\,1} \right)\), \(Y = 0.2041241X + e\), \(e \sim N\left( {0,\,\,1} \right)\), \(U \sim N\left( {0,\,\,9} \right)\), \(V \sim N\left( {0,\,\,9} \right)\), \(\rho_{YX} = 0.20\), \(N = 50000\), \(W_{2} = 30\% ,\,40\% ,\,\,60\%\), and \(k = 2,\,3\).
-
Simulated Population 2:
\(X \sim N\left( {0.5,\,1} \right)\), \(Y = 0.5773503X + e\), \(e \sim N\left( {0,\,\,1} \right)\), \(U \sim N\left( {0,\,\,9} \right)\), \(V \sim N\left( {0,\,\,9} \right)\), \(\rho_{YX} = 0.50\), \(N = 50000\), \(W_{2} = 30\% ,\,40\% ,\,\,60\%\), and \(k = 2,\,3\).
-
Simulated Population 3:
\(X \sim N\left( {0.5,\,1} \right)\), \(Y = 0.9801961X + e\), \(e \sim N\left( {0,\,\,1} \right)\), \(U \sim N\left( {0,\,\,9} \right)\), \(V \sim N\left( {0,\,\,9} \right)\), \(\rho_{YX} = 0.70\), \(N = 50000\), \(W_{2} = 30\% ,\,40\% ,\,\,60\%\), and \(k = 2,\,3\).
Appendix B
See Appendix Tables
Appendix C
In order for derivations of different variances, covariance and MSEs assuming the joint presence of non-response and measurement error, some of the important derivations and expectations are reproduced following the Azeem [24], Cochran [1], and Hansen and Hurwitz [5].
Let us consider \(W_{Y}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {Y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{Y}} \right)}\), \(W_{X}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {X_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{X}} \right)}\), \(W_{X} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {X^{\prime}_{i} - \overline{X}} \right)}\), \(W_{U}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {U_{i}^{*} }\), and \(W_{V}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {V_{i}^{*} }\).
Further, we consider.
\(e_{0}^{*} = \frac{1}{{n\overline{Y}}}\left( {W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} } \right)\), or alternatively \(e_{0}^{*} = \frac{{\overline{y}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{Y}}}{{\overline{Y}}}\),
\(e_{1}^{*} = \frac{1}{{n\overline{X}}}\left( {W_{X}^{*} + W_{V}^{*} } \right)\), or alternatively \(e_{1}^{*} = \frac{{\overline{x}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{X}}}{{\overline{X}}}\),
and \(e^{\prime}_{1} = \frac{{W_{X} }}{{n^{\prime}\overline{X}}}\), or alternatively \(e^{\prime}_{1} = \frac{{\overline{x}^{\prime} - \overline{X}}}{{\overline{X}}}\).
Now consider, \(W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {Y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{Y}} \right)} + \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {U_{i}^{*} }\),
\(W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {Y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{Y}} \right)} + \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - Y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right)}\),
Or alternatively.
\(\frac{{W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} }}{n} = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } - \overline{Y}\).
Now we divide the n into three components, \(n_{1}\) (respondents of the first attempt), \(r\)(selected for the interview) and \(n_{2} - r\)(not selected for the interview) such that \(n = n_{1} + (n_{2} - r) + r\). Therefore, we rewrite the previous expression as.
\(\frac{{W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} }}{n} = \frac{1}{n}\left( {n_{1} \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_{1} }} {y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } }}{{n_{1} }} + \left( {n_{2} - r} \right)\frac{{\sum\limits_{{i = n_{1} + 1}}^{{n_{1} + n_{2} - r}} {y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } }}{{n_{2} - r}} + r\frac{{\sum\limits_{{i = n_{1} + n_{2} - r + 1}}^{n} {y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } }}{r}} \right) - \overline{Y}\).
\(\frac{{W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} }}{n} = \frac{1}{n}\left( {n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} + \left( {n_{2} - r} \right)\overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} - r} \right)}}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} + r\overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right) - \overline{Y}\).
Or alternatively can be given by.
\(\frac{{W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} }}{n} = \frac{1}{n}\left( {n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} + \left( {n_{2} - r} \right)\overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} + r\overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right) - \overline{Y}\), since \(\overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}}\) and \(\overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} - r} \right)}}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}}\) are the unbiased estimators for the same population of non-respondents, i.e.\(E\left( {\overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right) = E\left( {\overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} - r} \right)}}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right) = \overline{Y}_{2}\). For more details, see Azeem [25], Hansen and Hurwitz [5], and Cochran [1].
\(\frac{{W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} }}{n} = \frac{1}{n}\left( {n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} + n_{2} \overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right) - \overline{Y}\).
\(\frac{{W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} }}{n} = \overline{y}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{Y}\).
In order to show \(\overline{y}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}}\) is an unbiased estimator, take expectations of \(\overline{y}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}}\),
\(E\left( {\overline{y}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right) = E\left( {\frac{{n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} + n_{2} \overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} }}{n}} \right)\),
Or alternatively we consider.
\(E_{1} E_{2} \left( {\overline{y}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right) = E_{1} E_{2} \left( {\frac{{n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} + n_{2} \overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} }}{n}} \right)\),
\(= E_{1} \left( {\frac{{n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } + E_{2} \left( {n_{2} \overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{*\prime \prime } } \right)}}{n}} \right)\),
\(= E_{1} \left( {\frac{{n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } + n_{2} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } }}{n}} \right)\),\(\because E_{2} \left( {\overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right) = \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} } \right)}}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}}\).
or.
\(= E_{1} \left( {w_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } + w_{2} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } } \right)\), where \(w_{1} = \frac{{n_{1} }}{n}\), and \(w_{2} = \frac{{n_{2} }}{n}\).
\(E\left( {\overline{y}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right) = W_{1} \overline{Y}_{1} + W_{2} \overline{Y}_{2}\),
Hence \(E(\overline{y}^{*\prime \prime } ) = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} {Y_{i} } }}{N} = \overline{Y}\), and \(\overline{y}^{*}\) is an unbiased estimator of \(\overline{Y}\). Now in order to get an expression for variance of \(\overline{y}^{*}\), we proceed as
or.
\(Var\left( {\overline{y}^{*\prime \prime } } \right) = \frac{1}{{n^{2} }}E\left( {n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } + n_{2} \overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{*\prime \prime } - n\overline{Y}} \right)^{2}\).
Since \(\overline{y}\prime \prime = \frac{1}{n}\left( {n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } + n_{2} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } } \right)\) therefore alternatively we can consider \(n_{1} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{1} } \right)}}^{*} = n\overline{y} - n_{2} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} } \right)}}^{*}\), see Cochran [1]. Now.
\(= \frac{1}{{n^{2} }}E\left( {\left( {n\overline{y}\prime \prime - n_{2} \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } } \right) + n_{2} \overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{*\prime \prime } - n\overline{Y}} \right)^{2}\),
or
Eq. (C-3) is given by
because \(E_{1} \frac{{n_{2} }}{n}\left( {\overline{y}\prime \prime - \overline{Y}} \right)E_{2} \left( {\overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{*\prime \prime } - \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } } \right) = 0\).
From Eq. (C-4), we consider.
\(E_{1} \left( {\frac{{n_{2} }}{n}} \right)^{2} E_{2} \left( {\overline{y}_{\left( r \right)}^{*\prime \prime } - \overline{y}_{{\left( {n_{2} } \right)}}^{*\prime \prime } } \right)^{2}\) = \(E_{1} \left( {\frac{{n_{2} }}{n}} \right)^{2} \frac{{n_{2} - r}}{{n_{2} - 1}}\frac{{s_{Y\left( 2 \right)}^{2} + s_{U\left( 2 \right)}^{2} }}{r}\),
or.
= \(E_{1} \left( {\frac{{n_{2} }}{n}} \right)^{2} \frac{{n_{2} - r}}{{n_{2} - 1}}\frac{{n_{2} - 1}}{{n_{2} }}\frac{{S_{Y\left( 2 \right)}^{2} + S_{U\left( 2 \right)}^{2} }}{r}\) since \(\left( {s_{Y\left( 2 \right)}^{2} + s_{U\left( 2 \right)}^{2} } \right) = \frac{{n_{2} - 1}}{{n_{2} }}\left( {S_{Y\left( 2 \right)}^{2} + S_{U\left( 2 \right)}^{2} } \right)\).
\(= E_{1} \left( {\frac{{n_{2} }}{{n^{2} }}} \right)\frac{{n_{2} - r}}{r}\left( {S_{Y\left( 2 \right)}^{2} + S_{U\left( 2 \right)}^{2} } \right)\),since \(k = \frac{{n_{2} }}{r}\).
\(= \frac{{nN_{2} }}{{n^{2} N}}(k - 1)\left( {S_{Y\left( 2 \right)}^{2} + S_{U\left( 2 \right)}^{2} } \right)\),where \(E_{1} (n_{2} ) = \frac{{nN_{2} }}{N}\).
From Eq. (C-4), we consider
Now, substituting Eq. (C-5) and Eq. (C-6) in Eq. (C-4) the variance of \(\overline{y}^{*\prime \prime }\) is given by.
\({\text{Var}}(\overline{y}^{*\prime \prime } ) = \left( {\lambda^{\prime \prime } \left( {S_{Y}^{2} + S_{U}^{2} } \right) + \theta^{*} \left( {S_{Y\left( 2 \right)}^{2} + S_{U\left( 2 \right)}^{2} } \right)} \right)\).
Or alternatively can be given by.
\(E\left( {e_{0}^{*} } \right)^{2} = E_{1} E_{2} \left( {\frac{{\overline{y}^{*\prime \prime } - \overline{Y}}}{{\overline{Y}}}} \right)^{2} = E_{1} E_{2} \left( {\frac{{W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} }}{{\overline{Y}n}}} \right)^{2}\),
or also can be given by
Similarly, one can get.
\(Var(\overline{x}^{*\prime \prime } ) = \lambda^{\prime \prime } \left( {S_{X}^{2} + S_{V}^{2} } \right) + \theta^{*} \left( {S_{X\left( 2 \right)}^{2} + S_{V\left( 2 \right)}^{2} } \right)\),
alternatively is given by.
\(E\left( {e_{1}^{*} } \right)^{2} = E_{1} E_{2} \left( {\frac{{\overline{x}^{*\prime \prime } - \overline{X}}}{{\overline{X}}}} \right)^{2} = E_{1} E_{2} \left( {\frac{{W_{X}^{*} + W_{V}^{*} }}{{\overline{X}n}}} \right)^{2}\),
Similarly
where \(Cov(\overline{x}^{*\prime \prime } ,\overline{y}^{*\prime \prime } ) = \lambda \prime \prime S_{YX} + \theta^{*} S_{YX(2)}\).
Similarly.
\(E\left( {e^{\prime}_{1} } \right)^{2} = E^{\prime}\left( {\frac{{\overline{x}^{\prime} - \overline{X}}}{{\overline{X}}}} \right)^{2} = E^{\prime}\left( {\frac{{W_{X} }}{{\overline{X}n}}} \right)^{2} = \frac{1}{{\overline{X}^{2} }}Var(\overline{x}^{\prime}) = \frac{1}{{\overline{X}^{2} }}\lambda^{\prime}S_{X}^{2} = V^{\prime}_{20}\),
and
and
When non-response and measurement errors are present only on study variable, we get Eq. (C-1)-( C-11) given below.
Let us consider \(W_{Y}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {Y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{Y}} \right)}\), \(W_{X} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {X_{i} - \overline{X}} \right)}\), \(W_{X} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {X^{\prime}_{i} - \overline{X}} \right)}\), and \(W_{U}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {U_{i}^{*} }\).
Further we consider.
\(e_{0}^{*} = \frac{1}{{n\overline{Y}}}\left( {W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} } \right)\), or alternatively \(e_{0}^{*} = \frac{{\overline{y}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{Y}}}{{\overline{Y}}}\),
\(e_{1} = \frac{{W_{X} }}{{n\overline{X}}}\), or alternatively \(e_{1} = \frac{{\overline{x} - \overline{X}}}{{\overline{X}}}\),
and \(e^{\prime}_{1} = \frac{{W_{X} }}{{n^{\prime}\overline{X}}}\), or alternatively \(e^{\prime}_{1} = \frac{{\overline{x}^{\prime} - \overline{X}}}{{\overline{X}}}\).
Now consider, \(W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {Y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{Y}} \right)} + \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {U_{i}^{*} }\),
\(W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {Y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - \overline{Y}} \right)} + \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} - Y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } \right)}\),
Or alternatively.
\(\frac{{W_{Y}^{*} + W_{U}^{*} }}{n} = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {y_{i}^{{*^{\prime\prime}}} } - \overline{Y}\).
Now we get.
\(Var(\overline{x}) = \lambda^{\prime \prime } S_{X}^{2}\),
alternatively is given by
Similarly
where \({\text{Cov}}(\overline{x}^{*\prime \prime } ,\overline{y}^{*\prime \prime } ) = \lambda^{\prime \prime } S_{YX} + \theta^{*} S_{YX(2)}\).
Similarly.
\(E\left( {e^{\prime}_{1} } \right)^{2} = E^{\prime}\left( {\frac{{\overline{x}^{\prime} - \overline{X}}}{{\overline{X}}}} \right)^{2} = E^{\prime}\left( {\frac{{W_{X} }}{{\overline{X}n}}} \right)^{2} = \frac{1}{{\overline{X}^{2} }}Var(\overline{x}^{\prime}) = \frac{1}{{\overline{X}^{2} }}\lambda^{\prime}S_{X}^{2} = V^{\prime}_{20}\),
and
and
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabir, S., Sanaullah, A. Efficient Estimation of Mean in Two-Phase Sampling when Measurement Error and Non-Response are Simultaneously Present. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 92, 633–646 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-022-00776-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-022-00776-x