Skip to main content
Log in

Does Regulatory Flexibility Affect Risk Disclosures in Annual Report?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flexibility is often defined in terms of autonomy of actions, freedom of expression, balancing in competing opposites and agility in actions. Such flexibility assumes greater significance in the dynamic system in which business operates. In this mutually reinforcing system, Indian regulators have accorded flexibility to companies to decide the nature, type, tone and time orientation of risk disclosures (in annual reports) based on their competitive position. Accordingly, the paper strives to ascertain how this regulatory flexibility is leveraged by Indian companies. For the purpose, content analysis and textual analysis are employed on over 4000 annual reports of NIFTY500 companies, covering a period 10-year period from 2005 to 2015. In tune with agency theory, proprietary cost theory, duality theory and contingency theory, the findings indicate that companies that are in a better competitive position tend to make greater and more comprehensive risk disclosures. The results are robust at company level, industry level and sectoral level. Further, the results unambiguously reflect how this flexibility affected the strategic decision making during the time of global financial crisis. Amidst calls for increasing regulations, particularly in the domain of disclosures, these findings clearly highlight the need for regulatory flexibility in decisions that have strategic implications for firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Listing agreement is an agreement between a company that desires to be listed or is listed on a stock exchange and the concerned stock exchange.

References

  • Abraham, S., & Cox, P. (2007). Analysing the determinants of narrative risk information in UK FTSE 100 annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 39(1), 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhtar, M., & Mittal, R. K. (2010). Enterprise performance management and flexibility: Factors of effectiveness in upstream oil industry in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(4), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amran, A., Bin, A. M. R., & Hassan, B. C. H. M. (2009). Risk reporting: An exploratory study on risk management disclosure in Malaysian annual reports. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(1), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, A., Jia, X., & Totikidis, V. (2005). Parallels in private and public sector governance. Centre for International Corporate Governance Research, Victoria University, Melbourne. http://vuir.vu.edu.au/948/1. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley, S. (2004). A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., & Lemoine, J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1–2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2389563.

  • Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2004). A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting, 39(1), 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishwas, S., & Dutta, S. (2015). Assessing market risk of Indian index funds. Global Business Review, 16(3), 511–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabedo, J. D., & Tirado, J. M. (2004). The disclosure of risk in financial statements. Accounting Forum, 28(2), 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure policies of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, S. M., Herd, R., & Chalaux, T. (2009). What is holding back productivity growth in India. Journal: Economic Studies OECD. ISSN 1995-2848 OECD.

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research: Academy of management. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elshandidy, T., Fraser, I., & Hussainey, K. (2013). Aggregated, voluntary, and mandatory risk disclosure incentives: Evidence from FTSE all share. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30(3), 320–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzahar, H., & Hussainey, K. (2012). Determinants of narrative risk disclosures in UK interim reports. Journal of Risk Finance, 13(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppink, J. D. (1978). Planning for strategic flexibility. Long Range Planning, 11(1), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. W. (1972). Duality principles in the theory of cost and production—Revisited. International Economic Review, 13(1), 167–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, G. (2012). The management’s reaction to new mandatory risk disclosure: A longitudinal study on Italian listed companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(2), 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, C. W. (1975). Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Academy Management Journal, 18(1), 784–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. S., & Pae, S. (2015). Discretionary disclosure, spillovers and competition. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(1), 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). (2016). Various publications. www.icai.org/new_category.html?. Accessed 3 Apr 2017.

  • Jain, P. K., Singh, S., & Yadav, S. S. (2013). Financial management practices. In an empirical study of Indian corporates. New Delhi: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. C. W., & Roy, S. (2011). Strategic disclosure and signalling of product quality with price competition. In 38th EARIE conference, Stockholm, Sweden, September 1–3.

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, J., Munro, L., & Buckby, S. (2016). A finer-grained approach to assessing the—quality (quantity and richness) of risk management disclosures. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(8–9), 770–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2001). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanapathippillai, S., Johl, S. K., & Wines, G. (2016). Remuneration committee effectiveness and narrative remuneration disclosure. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 40, 384–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. (2010). Negotiated measurement rules in debt contracts. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(5), 1103–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linsley, P. M., & Shrives, P. J. (2000). Risk management and reporting risk in the UK. Journal of Risk, 3(1), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linsley, P. M., & Shrives, P. J. (2006). Risk reporting: A study of risk disclosures in the annual reports of UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 38(1), 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J., & Lawrence, P. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Ottemann, R. (1973). Motivation vs. learning approaches to organizational behaviour. Business Horizons, 16(6), 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, C., & Shrives, P. (1991). The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: A review article. The British Accounting Review, 25(1), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M., & Adler, R. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1987). The strategy concept I: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., Mohit, D., & Parimal, (2011). Market concentration in Indian manufacturing sector: Measurement issues. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(49), 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. (1996). Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy, 104(4), 724–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntim, C. G., Lindop, S., & Thomas, D. (2013). Corporate governance and risk reporting in South Africa: A study of corporate risk disclosures in the pre- and post-2007/2008 global financial crisis periods. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30(1), 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntim, C. G., Opong, K. K., & Danbolt, J. (2012a). The relative value relevance of shareholder versus stakeholder corporate governance disclosure policy reforms in South Africa. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(1), 84–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntim, C. G., Opong, K. K., Danbolt, J., & Thomas, D. A. (2012b). Voluntary corporate governance disclosures by post-apartheid South African listed corporations. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13(1), 122–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, J., Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2011). Risk-related disclosures by non-finance companies: Portuguese practices and disclosure characteristics. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(9), 817–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu-Ansah, S. (1998). The impact of corporate attributes on the extent of mandatory disclosure and reporting by listed companies in Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Accounting, 33(5), 605–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, K., Whitworth, B., & Fjermestad, J. (2005). Leading IT flexibility: Anticipation, agility and adaptability. In 11th Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS 2005, Omaha, Nebraska, USA, August 11–14.

  • Roberts, N., & Stockport, G. J. (2009). Defining strategic flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(1), 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (1977). The determination of financial structure: The incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C., & Ng, C. (2000). Public sector corporate governance disclosures: An examination of annual reporting practices in Queensland. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(2), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Jain, P. K., & Yadav, S. S. (2012). Capital budgeting decisions: Evidence from India. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 9(1), 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singla, M., & Singh, S. (2018). Impact of institutional set-up on the responsiveness to change in a firm’s governance structure: A comparative study of public and private sector Enterprises in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. M. (1996). Rethinking risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9(3), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (1997). Flexible systems management: An evolving paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(4), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2000). Concept of systemic flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 1(1), 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2001). SAP-LAP framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2(1), 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2005). A flexible strategy framework for managing continuity and change. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 1(1), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2008). The concept of a flexible enterprise. In Proceedings of GLOGIFT, 08, June 1416, 2008, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.

  • Sushil, (2012a). Flowing stream strategy: Managing confluence of continuity and change. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(1), 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2012b). Flexibility maturity model: Possibilities and directions. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 75–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2015). Strategic flexibility: The evolving paradigm of strategic management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2016). The inflexibility of technology. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(4), 341–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, & Stohr, E. A. (2014). The concept of a flexible enterprise. India: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unerman, J. (2000). Methodological issues-Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia, R. E. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5(1), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 97–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verrecchia, R. E., & Clinch, G. (1997). Competitive disadvantage and discretionary disclosure in industries. Australian Journal of Management, 22(2), 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Shivaani.

Appendices

Appendix 1: List of Items/Themes Constituting Risk Disclosure Index (RDI)

S. no.

 
 

Items rated on a scale of 6–29* (possible sources of risks)

1

Interest rates

2

Exchange rates

3

Commodity prices

4

Liquidity

5

Credit/default

6

Capital adequacy/insolvency

7

Equity prices

8

Financial derivatives/instruments

9

Counterparty default

10

Funding risk

11

Investment risk

12

Executive compensation/bonus/employee pension commitments

13

Customer concentration risk

14

Overdependence on a division/diversification

15

Industry conditions

16

Assets portfolio

17

Competition

18

IPR

19

Business processes and procedures/operations

20

Technology/information technology

21

Health and safety

22

Environment

23

Reputation/goodwill/image/brand name

24

Quality

25

Compliance

26

Legal

27

Sourcing/raw material

28

New segment/product development

29

Marketing/customer satisfaction/boycott

30

Social contribution/community support

31

Internal audit and control

32

Human resources/employee/labour turnover/unrest

33

Integrity/management and employee fraud

34

Governance/leadership and management

35

Existing product/service/division failure

36

Business ethics/corruption

37

Stock/service obsolescence and shrinkage inventory

38

New product/service/expansion

39

Distribution network

40

Power

41

Pricing policy of company

42

Wages

43

Mergers and acquisitions/partnerships

44

Supply chain

45

Freight rates

46

Location/ geographic risk

47

Sovereign/politics

48

Government policies

49

Public/budget deficit

50

Regulation (absence/delay)

51

Taxation

52

GDP growth/market demand/aggregate demand

53

Unemployment rate

54

Inflation rate

55

Natural disasters/terrorism

56

Money supply/quantitative easing

57

Oil price

58

Contract duration risk

59

Economic slowdown

 

Items rated on binary scale (items pertaining to risk management)

60

Disclosure of existence of risk management policies

61

Disclosure of risk governance existence

62

Disclosure of risk committee existence

63

Disclosure of risk committee composition

64

Disclosure of name of risk committee members

65

Disclosure of risk committee members’ meetings

66

Disclosure of risk committee members’ meetings attendance

67

Disclosure of risk committee remittances

68

Disclosure on existence of enterprise risk management (ERM)

69

Risk management section

 

Items not included in index, but studied separately

70

Absence of risks and concerns section in MDandA

71

Absence of threats and opportunities section in MDandA

  1. Source: Ntim et al. (2013) with author modifications

Appendix 2: Industry by Industry Comparison of Various Elements of Disclosure Quality

Sample 1-sample 2

Test statistics

Adj. sig.

Sample 1-sample 2

Test statistics

Adj. sig.

Number of risk items are same across industries

Proportion of both forward- and backward-looking statements is same across industries

Capital goods-housing and construction

− 281.828

0.026

Textile-housing and construction

261.546

0.006

Capital goods-transport

− 419.94

0.006

Textile-metals

413.159

0.000

Capital goods-chemical

− 621.025

0.000

Textile-media

436.486

0.000

Capital goods-oil and gas

− 785.404

0.000

Textile-power

440.79

0.000

Health care-chemical

511.672

0.000

Textile-transport

− 597.671

0.000

Health care-oil and gas

− 674.141

0.000

Miscellaneous-housing and construction

246.098

0.046

FMCG-chemical

503.314

0.000

Miscellaneous-metals

397.711

0.000

FMCG-oil and gas

− 667.693

0.000

Miscellaneous-media

421.038

0.000

Textile-chemical

497.182

0.000

Miscellaneous-power

− 425.342

0.000

Textile-oil and gas

661.56

0.000

Miscellaneous-transport

− 582.223

0.000

ICT-chemical

461.549

0.000

Oil and gas-housing and construction

218.732

0.023

ICT-oil and gas

− 625.928

0.000

Oil and gas-metals

370.345

0.000

Media-chemical

438.647

0.001

Oil and gas-media

393.672

0.000

Media-oil and gas

− 603.025

0.000

Oil and gas-power

− 397.976

0.000

Metals-chemical

436.187

0.002

Oil and gas-transport

− 554.857

0.000

Metals-oil and gas

− 600.566

0.000

FMCG-metals

− 312.295

0.000

Power-chemical

419.133

0.001

FMCG-media

− 335.622

0.000

Power-oil and gas

583.511

0.000

FMCG-power

− 339.927

0.000

Miscellaneous-chemical

400.588

0.028

FMCG-transport

− 496.808

0.000

Miscellaneous-oil and gas

− 564.967

0.000

Capital goods-metals

− 306.193

0.000

Diversified-oil and gas

− 555.159

0.000

Capital goods-media

− 329.521

0.000

Housing and construction-chemical

339.197

0.042

Capital goods-power

− 333.825

0.000

Housing and construction-oil and gas

− 503.575

0.000

Capital goods-transport

− 490.706

0.000

Number of risk management items are same across industries

Diversified-metals

− 281.394

0.034

Diversified-media

− 304.721

0.007

Diversified-oil and gas

− 382.995

0.002

Diversified-power

− 309.026

0.002

Diversified-media

− 392.395

0.002

Diversified-transport

− 465.907

0.000

Diversified-miscellaneous

− 472.049

0.000

Health care-transport

− 387.465

0.002

Metals-oil and gas

− 321.995

0.005

ICT-media

− 217.032

0.031

Metals-media

331.395

0.005

ICT-power

− 221.336

0.004

Metals-miscellaneous

− 411.049

0.001

ICT-transport

− 378.217

0.000

Power-oil and gas

320.732

0.000

Agriculture-transport

− 363.752

0.006

Power-media

330.132

0.001

Chemical-transport

− 353.373

0.008

Power-miscellaneous

409.786

0.000

Housing and construction-transport

− 336.126

0.002

Capital goods-oil and gas

− 274.87

0.014

Proportion of neutral statements is same across industries

Capital goods-media

− 284.27

0.015

Capital goods-miscellaneous

− 363.924

0.002

Transport-textile

204.007

0.047

Housing and construction-miscellaneous

− 317.19

0.017

Transport-chemical

231.233

0.021

FMCG-miscellaneous

− 312.491

0.032

Transport-diversified

261.602

0.003

Total number of risk items are same across industries

Transport-oil and gas

336.948

0.000

Miscellaneous-oil and gas

− 267.375

0.000

Capital goods-housing and construction

− 284.184

0.024

Housing and construction-oil and gas

− 231.566

0.000

Capital goods-agriculture

346.906

0.049

Media-oil and gas

− 226.673

0.000

Capital goods-transport

− 421.647

0.005

Power-oil and gas

226.479

0.000

Capital goods-chemical

− 594.167

0.000

Metals-oil and gas

− 221.759

0.000

Capital goods-oil and gas

− 790.393

0.000

Agriculture-oil and gas

− 217.207

0.004

FMCG-chemical

466.003

0.000

ICT-oil and gas

− 205.703

0.000

FMCG-oil and gas

− 662.23

0.000

Health care-oil and gas

− 202.955

0.011

Textile-chemical

450.911

0.002

FMCG-oil and gas

− 202.284

0.000

Textile-oil and gas

647.138

0.000

Capital goods-oil and gas

− 181.207

0.001

Health care-chemical

446.946

0.01

Proportion of good statements is same across industries

Health care-oil and gas

− 543.173

0.000

Metals-chemical

419.835

0.005

Transport-ICT

415.886

0.000

Metals-oil and gas

− 616.062

0.000

Transport-metals

432.359

0.000

Metals-chemical

419.835

0.005

Transport-agriculture

461.133

0.001

Metals-oil and gas

− 616.062

0.000

Transport-diversified

471.266

0.000

Power-chemical

404.096

0.002

Transport-miscellaneous

484.99

0.000

Power-oil and gas

600.322

0.000

Transport-FMCG

493.709

0.000

ICT-chemical

400.137

0.002

Transport-chemical

504.709

0.000

ICT-oil and gas

− 596.364

0.000

Transport-oil and gas

510.757

0.000

Diversified-oil and gas

− 578.186

0.000

Transport-housing and construction

539.505

0.000

Media-oil and gas

− 536.584

0.000

Transport-textile

561.156

0.000

Housing and construction-oil and gas

− 506.209

0.000

Transport-capital goods

656.631

0.000

Miscellaneous-oil and gas

− 478.812

0.000

Health care-housing and construction

− 307.614

0.200

Proportion of forward-looking statements is same across industries

Health care-textile

− 329.265

0.024

Health care-capital goods

424.74

0.000

Capital goods-housing and construction

− 284.184

0.024

Media-FMCG

249.754

0.049

Capital goods-agriculture

346.906

0.049

Media-oil and gas

− 266.802

0.018

Capital goods-transport

− 421.647

0.005

Media-housing and construction

295.55

0.002

Capital goods-chemical

− 594.167

0.000

Media-textile

− 317.2

0.004

Capital goods-oil and gas

− 790.393

0.000

Media-capital goods

412.676

0.000

FMCG-chemical

466.003

0.000

Power-oil and gas

229.267

0.041

FMCG-oil and gas

− 662.23

0.000

Power-housing and construction

258.015

0.004

Textile-chemical

450.911

0.002

Power-textile

− 279.666

0.009

Textile-oil and gas

647.138

0.000

Power-capital goods

375.141

0.000

Health care-chemical

446.946

0.01

ICT-capital goods

240.745

0.014

Health care-oil and gas

− 543.173

0.000

Proportion of bad statements is same across industries

Metals-chemical

419.835

0.005

Metals-oil and gas

− 616.062

0.000

Oil and gas-housing and construction

285.136

0.012

Metals-chemical

419.835

0.005

Oil and gas-metals

314.372

0.014

Metals-oil and gas

− 616.062

0.000

Oil and gas-media

353.943

0.001

Power-chemical

404.096

0.002

Oil and gas-agriculture

359.078

0.015

Power-oil and gas

600.322

0.000

Oil and gas-ICT

375.479

0.000

ICT-chemical

400.137

0.002

Oil and gas-miscellaneous

399.412

0.001

ICT-oil and gas

− 596.364

0.000

Oil and gas-power

− 497.392

0.000

Diversified-oil and gas

− 578.186

0.000

Oil and gas-transport

− 678.821

0.000

Media-oil and gas

− 536.584

0.000

Textile-power

352.575

0.001

Housing and construction-oil and gas

− 506.209

0.000

Textile-transport

− 534.004

0.000

Miscellaneous-oil and gas

− 478.812

0.000

Diversified-power

− 340.144

0.016

Proportion of backward-looking statements is same across industries

Diversified-transport

− 521.573

0.000

Capital goods-power

− 327.03

0.000

Transport-oil and gas

203.356

0.029

Capital goods-transport

− 508.459

0.000

Transport-textile

206.219

0.05

Chemical-transport

− 481.527

0.002

Transport-ICT

206.761

0.014

Health care-transport

− 474.506

0.003

Transport-health care

262.665

0.004

FMCG-transport

− 423.573

0.002

Transport-agriculture

264.568

0.004

Housing and construction-transport

− 393.686

0.005

Transport-miscellaneous

267.99

0.002

Metals-transport

− 364.45

0.046

Transport-capital goods

307.741

0.000

Proportion of both good and bad statements is same across industries

Transport-diversified

329.321

0.000

Metals-oil and gas

− 194.936

0.003

Power-housing and construction

236.709

0.025

Metals-textile

− 197.799

0.008

Power-textile

− 279.724

0.015

Metals-ICT

198.341

0.001

Power-diversified

290.314

0.05

Metals-health care

254.246

0.001

Power-oil and gas

387.744

0.000

Metals-agriculture

256.148

0.001

Power-health care

438.724

0.000

Metals-miscellaneous

− 259.57

0.000

   

Metals-capital goods

299.321

0.000

   

Metals-diversified

320.901

0.000

   

Media-miscellaneous

− 184.471

0.042

   

Media-capital goods

224.221

0.000

   

Media-diversified

245.802

0.001

   

Power-miscellaneous

182.868

0.018

   

Power-capital goods

222.618

0.000

   

Power-diversified

244.199

0.000

   

FMCG-capital goods

203.061

0.000

   

FMCG-diversified

224.642

0.002

   

Housing and construction-capital goods

149.952

0.026

   

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shivaani, M.V. Does Regulatory Flexibility Affect Risk Disclosures in Annual Report?. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 19, 321–336 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0196-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0196-6

Keywords

Navigation