Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpretive Ranking of Choice of Interaction of Parent Firms Post-International Joint Venture Termination using TISM-IRP

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International joint ventures (IJVs) have been explored in the extant strategic management literature from multiple facets. This study extends beyond the usual areas of research in the IJV literature and attempts to explore the interaction choice of IJV parent firms post-termination of their IJV. Using data on terminated two-partner IJV headquartered in India, we attempt to determine the ranking of choice of interaction post-IJV termination as supplier–buyer, complement, or competitor. Five factors have been considered in this study as antecedents to the choice of interaction post-IJV termination—type of IJV, cultural distance, bargaining power, industry regulation, and type of termination. The results suggest that each factor affects hierarchy of choice of interaction post-IJV termination distinctly and cumulatively influences the choice of complement interaction more than competitor interaction and supplier–buyer interaction. The change in relationship between parent firms from being in an IJV to an interaction post-IJV termination as supplier–buyer, complement or competitor can be attributed to the strategic flexibility of the organization. The paper explores a practical business phenomenon observed in emerging markets and establishes its theoretical foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alabdul Razzak, M., Al-Kwifi, O. S., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2018). Rapid alignment of resources and capabilities in time-bound networks: A theoretical proposition. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,19(4), 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1990). Two firms, one frontier: On assessing joint venture performance. Sloan Management Review,31(2), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, S., & Koza, M. P. (1993). Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint ventures: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,20(January 1993), 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamel, N., Dhir, S., & Sushil, (2019). Inter-partner dynamics and joint venture competitiveness: A fuzzy TISM approach. Benchmarking. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-02-2018-0041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., Bell, J. H. J., & Pennings, J. M. (1996). Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal,17(2), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1997). What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures? Journal of International Business Studies,28(4), 845–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhal, K. T., & Gulati, N. (2006). Predicting turnover intentions: Incorporating the role of organization and work-group level variables. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,7(3&4), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., Momaya, K. S., & Iyer, K. C. (2012). Strategic change for growth: A case of construction company in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,13(4), 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, S., & Kohli, B. (2018). Study of FDI trends and patterns in BRICS economies during the period 1990–2015. Emerging Economy Studies,4(1), 78–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canabal, A., & White, G. O. (2008). Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review,17(3), 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. M., & Makino, S. (2007). Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies,38(4), 621–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., & Rosenzweig, P. M. (2001). The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal,22(8), 747–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, J., Globerman, S., & Nielsen, B. B. (2013). Cultural distance and the performance of international joint ventures: A critical assessment of model specifications and variable measurement. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances,3(1), 93–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, A. S., & Kumar, M. V. S. (2012). Termination of related and unrelated joint ventures: A contingency approach. Journal of Business Research,65(8), 1202–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnino, G. B., & Rocco, E. (2009). Coopetition strategy: Theory, experiments and cases. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan, S. M., & Zondag, M. M. (2016). Drivers of alliance terminations: An empirical examination of the bio-pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Marketing Management,54, 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science,11(1), 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, N. (2000). Environmental enforcement and small industries in India: Reworking the problem in the poverty context. World Development,28(5), 945–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, G. D., et al. (2010). Joint venture stability and cooperation: Direct, indirect and contingent effects of resource complementarity and trust. Industrial Marketing Management,39(5), 862–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, S. S., & Dhir, S. S. (2018a). Role of ambidexterity and learning capability in firm performance: A study of E-commerce industry in India. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems,48(4), 517–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, S., & Dhir, Sanjay. (2018b). Organizational capability and performance improvement: A study of e-commerce firms in Indian context. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness,13(1), 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, Sanjay, Dhir, Swati, & Samanta, P. (2018). Defining and developing a scale to measure strategic thinking. Foresight,20(3), 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, S., & Mital, A. (2013). Asymmetric motives in Indian bilateral cross-border joint ventures with G7 nations: Impact of relative partner characteristics and initial conditions. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances,3(1), 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, S., & Mital, A. (2018). An explorative study of trends, distribution and pattern of bilateral cross-border joint ventures (CBJVs). Journal of Indian Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-10-2017-0205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, S., Mital, A., & Srivastava, S. K. (2015). Dynamics of value creation in Indian bilateral cross-border joint ventures: A systems approach. Strategic Change,22, 471–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, S., & Sushil, (2017). Flexibility in modification and termination of cross-border joint ventures. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,18(2), 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhir, S., et al. (2019). Integration of knowledge and enhancing competitiveness: A case of acquisition of Zain by Bharti Airtel. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. R., Farris, P. W., & Verbeke, W. J. M. I. (2001). Dynamic strategic thinking. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,29(3), 216–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikova, D., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Foreign direct investment mode choice: Entry and establishment modes in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies,38(6), 1013–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. (1998). The alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnership. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussauge, P., Garrette, B., & Mitchell, W. (2004). Asymmetric performance: The market share impact of scale and link alliances in the global auto industry. Strategic Management Journal,25(7), 701–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt, H., & Chauhan, K. (2019). Using flexibility in designing CRM solution. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,20(2), 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, M., & Raju, V. (2019). Impact of over-the-top (OTT) services on the telecom companies in the era of transformative marketing. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,20(2), 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, M. B., & Porter, M. E. (1986). Coalitions and global strategy. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in global industries (pp. 315–344). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaister, K. W., & Buckley, P. J. (1996). Strategic motives for international alliance formation. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 301–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graetz, F. (2002). Strategic thinking versus strategic planning: Towards understanding the complementarities. Management Decision,40(5), 456–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Singh, H. (2009). The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management Journal,30(11), 1213–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Sytch, M., & Mehrotra, P. (2008). Breaking up is never easy: Planning for exit in a strategic alliance. California Management Review,50(4), 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. J., & Suri, P. K. (2018). Analysing the influence of improved situation, capability level of actors and flexible process workflow on public value of E-governance projects in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,19(4), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0198-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halder, A., Rao, N. S. V. D., & Momaya, K. S. (2016). Can flexibility in corporate governance enhance international competitiveness? Evidence from knowledge-based industries in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,17(4), 389–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haleem, A., et al. (2012). Analysis of critical success factors of world-class manufacturing practices: An application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process. Production Planning and Control,23(10–11), 722–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal,12(Special Issue: Global Strategy), 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. (1985). Coalition strategies: A framework for joint ventures. Academy of Management Proceedings,1985, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. (1986). Managing for joint venture success. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A. W., & Pudelko, M. (2016). ‘Do we need to distance ourselves from the distance concept? Why home and host country context might matter more than (cultural) distance. Management International Review,56(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, Z., Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2019). Modified total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) of asymmetric motives and its drivers in Indian bilateral CBJV. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-01-2018-0020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal,9(4), 361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F., & Zeng, M. (2002). Cross-cultural differences and joint venture longevity. Journal of International Business Studies,33(4), 699–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2005). The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal,48(2), 332–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Journal,22(1), 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Currall, S. (1998). The nature, antecedents, and consequences of joint venture trust. Journal of International Management,4(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management,28(3), 413–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isidor, R., et al. (2015). The impact of structural and attitudinal antecedents on the instability of international joint ventures: The mediating role of asymmetrical changes in commitment. International Business Review,24(2), 298–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., Kashiramka, S., & Jain, P. K. (2018). Impact of organizational learning and absorptive capacity on the abnormal returns of acquirers: Evidence from cross-border acquisitions by Indian companies. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,19(4), 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kak, A., & Sushil, (2002). Sustainable competitive advantage with core competence: A review. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,3(4), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, R. (2013). Collaborating with complementors: What do firms do? Advances in Strategic Management,30(2013), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khari, C., & Sinha, S. (2018). Organizational spirituality and knowledge sharing: A model of multiple mediation. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,19(4), 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozyra, B. (2012). Strategic alliance as a particular form of coopetition. Global Management Journal,4(1/2), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulshreshtha, R., et al. (2017). Critical success factors in implementation of urban metro system on PPP: A case study of Hyderabad Metro. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,18(4), 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (1995). Industrialisation, liberalisation and two way flows of foreign direct investments case of India. Economic and Political Weekly,30(50), 3228–3237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P., et al. (2018). Auxiliary flexibility in healthcare delivery system: An integrative framework and implications. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,19(2), 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H. W., & Beamish, P. W. (1990). Cross-cultural cooperative behaviour in joint ventures in LDCs. Management International Review,30(Special Issue), 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal,49(4), 797–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecraw, D. J. (1984). Bargaining power, ownership, and profitability of transnational corporations in developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies,15(1), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-R., Chen, W.-R., & Kao, C. (1998). Bargaining power and the trade-off between the ownership and control of international joint ventures in China. Journal of International Management,4(4), 353–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J. M. (1998). Strategic thinking: Can it be taught? Long Range Planning,31(1), 120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Liu, X., & Wang, H. (2011). Motives for outward FDI of Chinese private firms: Firm resources, industry dynamics, and government policies. Management and Organization Review,7(2), 223–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (1997). Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal,18(1), 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makino, S., et al. (2007). Intended and unintended termination of international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal,28(11), 1113–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S., Maheshwari, G. C., & Singh, A. (2019). Understanding financial inclusion in India: A theoretical framework building through SAP–LAP and efficient IRP. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,20(2), 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meschi, P.-X., Norheim-Hansen, A., & Riccio, E. L. (2016). Match-making in international joint ventures in emerging economies: Aligning asymmetric financial strength and equity stake. Management International Review,57, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meschi, P.-X., & Riccio, E. L. (2008). Country risk, national cultural differences between partners and survival of international joint ventures in Brazil. International Business Review,17(3), 250–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morschett, D., Schramm-Klein, H., & Swoboda, B. (2010). ‘Decades of research on market entry modes: What do we really know about external antecedents of entry mode choice? Journal of International Management,16(1), 60–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, M. (2005). Joint venture instability, learning and the relative bargaining power of the parent firms. International Business Review,14(4), 465–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, A., & Nippa, M. (2013). Rigor and relevance of IJV exit research. Management International Review,53(3), 449–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongsakul, V., Parameswar, N., & Dhir, S. (2019). Factors affecting the nature of alliance governance and competitiveness. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research,13, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palepu, K. G., & Khanna, T. (2013). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Brighton: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangarkar, N. (2007). Survival during a crisis: Alliances by Singapore firms. British Journal of Management,18(3), 209–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parameswar, N., & Dhir, S. (2018a). Post termination interaction in international joint ventures (IJV). Foresight,21(2), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-03-2018-0022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parameswar, N., & Dhir, S. (2018b). Technology transfer and innovation in global international joint venture (IJV): Emerging markets perspective. In J. Connell, et al. (Eds.), Global value chains, flexibility and sustainability (pp. 77–87). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parameswar, N., & Dhir, S. (2019a). Factors affecting the choice of interaction after the international joint venture termination in Africa: Total interpretive structural modeling. Strategic Change,28(6), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parameswar, N., & Dhir, S. (2019b). Global marketplace strategy and choice of interaction after termination of international joint venture. Strategic Change,28(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parameswar, N., Dhir, Swati, & Dhir, Sanjay. (2017). Banking on innovation, innovation in banking at ICICI bank. Global Business and Organizational Excellence,36(2), 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parameswar, N., Dhir, S., & Ongsakul, V. (2018). Purpose of international joint venture and interaction post termination. Journal of Global Business Advancement,11(6), 687–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Kim, D. (1997). Market valuation of joint ventures: Joint venture characteristics and wealth gains. Journal of Business Venturing,12(2), 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Russo, M. V. (1996). When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure. Management Science,42(6), 875–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, M., & Suresh, M. (2019). Modelling the enablers of workforce agility in IoT projects: A TISM approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,20(2), 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pothukuchi, V., et al. (2002). National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance. Journal of International Business Studies,33(2), 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J., Zollo, M., & Singh, H. (2002). Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal,23(2), 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy—When is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management,23(3), 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. M. (1998). Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science,44(4), 571–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibin, K. T., et al. (2018). Frugal innovation for supply chain sustainability in SMEs: multi-method research design. Production Planning and Control,29(11), 908–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrotriya, S., Sushil, & Dhir, S. (2017). Strategic change and flexibility in the operations of a large public-sector enterprise. Global Journal of Business Excellence,10(1), 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindhani, M., et al. (2019). Twitter analysis of founders of top 25 Indian startups. Journal of Global Business Advancement,12(1), 117–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N., & Kumar, S. (2014). Success of tata nano through marketing flexibility: A SAP-LAP matrices and linkages approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,15(2), 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Lane, P. J. (2004). A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance. Journal of International Business Studies,35(4), 306–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smriti, V., Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2018). Strategic thinking in professional environment: A review of the literature. Academy of Management Proceedings,2018(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., & Lyles, M. A. (2000). Explaining IJV survival in a transitional economy through social exchange and knowledge-based perspectives. Strategic Management Journal,21(8), 831–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2009). Interpretive ranking process. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,10(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2017a). Does flexibility mitigate or enhance risk? Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,18(3), 169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2017b). Modified ISM/TISM process with simultaneous transitivity checks for reduced direct pair comparisons. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,18(4), 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2017c). Multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM-IRP with a big data framework. Production Planning and Control,28(11–12), 999–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2018a). Flexible systems methodology: A mixed-method/multi-method research approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,19(2), 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2018b). Interpretive multi-criteria ranking of production systems with ordinal weights and transitive dominance relationships. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2946-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2018c). Interpretive multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives on direct value chain. Benchmarking: An International Journal,25(9), 3720–3742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2018d). Managing lifetime wastivity. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,19(3), 187–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal,28(13), 1319–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies,36(3), 270–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, T. W., Reuer, J. J., & Peng, M. W. (2008). International joint ventures and the value of growth options. Academy of Management Journal,51(5), 1014–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman, C., & Thorgren, S. (2016). Partner conflicts in international joint ventures: A minority owner perspective. Journal of International Management,22(2), 168–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsperger, J., Kocsis, E., & Rosta, M. (2009). Exploring the relationship between decision and ownership rights in joint ventures. International Studies of Management and Organization,39(4), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withisuphakorn, P., et al. (2019). Sustainable development in practice: Case study of L’Oréal. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research,13, 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, A. (1998). Structural stability and reconfiguration of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies,29(4), 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, A., & Duan, J. (2003). Interpartner fit and its performance implications: A four-case study of U.S.-China joint ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,20(4), 541–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D. W., & Makino, S. (2002). The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science,13(6), 667–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffie, D. B., & Kwak, M. (2006). With friends like these: The art of managing complementors. Harvard Business Review,84(9), 88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., Lee, S. H., & Han, K. (2015). FDI motives, market governance, and ownership choice of MNEs: A study of Malaysia and Thailand from an incomplete contracting perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,32(2), 335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., Hernandez, E., & Banerjee, S. (2010). Prior alliances with targets and acquisition performance in knowledge-intensive industries. Organization Science,21(5), 1072–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S., & Zaheer, A. (2006). Trust across borders. Journal of International Business Studies,37(1), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal,43(5), 925–950.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Management Jammu, Canal Road, Nawabad, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, 180016, India

    Nakul Parameswar

  2. Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India

    Sanjay Dhir &  Sushil

Authors
  1. Nakul Parameswar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanjay Dhir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sushil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nakul Parameswar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 6.

Table 6 Interpretive logic matrix
Full size table

Appendix 2: Dominating Interaction Matrices and Successive Comparison Diagraphs for Various Reference Variables

figure d

Appendix 3

See Table 7.

Table 7 Partitioning reachability matrix into levels
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parameswar, N., Dhir, S. & Sushil Interpretive Ranking of Choice of Interaction of Parent Firms Post-International Joint Venture Termination using TISM-IRP. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 21, 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00227-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00227-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation