Skip to main content
Log in

Laser weld formation and microstructure evolution in stainless steel alloys

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Welding in the World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variations in laser beam welding parameters can significantly influence weld pool shape and microstructure formation in stainless steel (SS) alloys. Fusion zone development using high travel speeds and low overall heat input promotes rapid solidification and high cooling rates. The difference in solidification rate within the weld pool is strongly influenced by changes in the weld pool geometry, which is directly dependent on process parameters. Therefore, a complete understanding of weld pool geometry as a function of process conditions is crucial to predicting solidification phenomena and avoiding weldability-related issues such as solidification cracking or an undesirable ferrite/austenite phase balance. In this work, the effect of laser weld parameters on the transition from conduction to keyhole mode welding was determined and related to microstructure formation in six SS alloys. The alloys had WRC-1992 Creq/Nieq ratios ranging from 1.7 to 2.8. The 1.7 Creq/Nieq alloy was a commercially available 304L SS, while the 2.7 Creq/Nieq was a 2205 duplex stainless steel. Compositions were also tested between these extremes. Both transverse and longitudinal view sections were evaluated to determine solidification behavior and phase fractions. Electron backscatter diffraction patterns were used extensively to determine phase fractions. Relationships among penetration mode (conduction vs. keyhole), composition (Creq/Nieq), and microstructure (solidification mode and phase fraction) are presented and compared to rapid weld solidification diagrams from the literature. The results presented here provide a more complete picture of rapid solidification phenomena associated with laser welds in SS alloys over a wide range of compositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Welding Society (2007) Laser beam welding, cutting, and associated processes. In: Welding Handbook Volume 3 Welding Processes, Part 2, Kautz D, Merchant VE, Milewski JO, Powers DE (eds), 9th edn. American Welding Society, Miami, 503–560

    Google Scholar 

  2. Patterson T, Hochanadel J, Sutton S, Panton B, Lippold J (2021) A review of high energy density beam processes for welding and additive manufacturing applications. Weld World 65(7):1235–1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-021-01116-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lippold JC (1985) Centerline cracking in deep penetration electron beam welds in type 304L stainless steel. Weld J 64(5):127s-136s

  4. Vitek JM, Dasgupta A, David SA (1983) Microstructural modification of austenitic stainless steels by rapid solidification. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 14 A(9):1833–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. David SA, Vitek JM (1989) Correlation between solidification parameters and weld microstructures. Int Mater Rev 34(1):213–245. https://doi.org/10.1179/imr.1989.34.1.213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. V. C. Kreuter V, Lippold JC (2016) Ductility-dip cracking susceptibility of commercially pure Ni and Ni-base alloys utilizing the strain-to-fracture test. In: Cracking Phenomena in Welds IV. (eds) Thomas Bollinghaus, J. C. Lippold and C. E. Cross, Springer, 145–159

  7. Lienert TJ, Lippold JC (2003) Improved weldability diagram for pulsed laser welded austenitic stainless steels. Sci Technol Weld Join 8(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217103225008847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baeslack WA, Davis JR, Cross CE (1993) Selection and weldability of conventional titanium alloys. In: ASM Handbook, Volume 6: Welding, Brazing, and Soldering, (eds) Olson DL, Siewert TA, Liu S, Edwards GR, vol 6. ASM International, 507–523

  9. Baeslack WA III, Becker DW, Froes FH (1984) Advances in titanium alloy welding metallurgy. J Met 36(5):46–58. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ay25041a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Varol I, Lippold JC, Baeslack WA (1992) Welding of duplex stainless steels. Key Eng. Mater 69-70:217–252

  11. Lippold JC, Kotecki DJ (2005) Welding metallurgy and weldability of stainless steels. John Wiley & Sons, Inc

  12. Baghdadchi A, Hosseini VA, Hurtig K, Karlsson L (2021) Promoting austenite formation in laser welding of duplex stainless steel—impact of shielding gas and laser reheating. Weld World 65(3):499–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-020-01026-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Omura T, Kushida T, Komizo Y (2000) Microstructural features and corrosion properties in laser welded duplex stainless steels. Weld Int 14(4):257–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09507110009549176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karlsson L (2012) Welding duplex stainless steels - a review of current recommendations. Weld World 56(5–6):65–76. https://doi.org/10.5937/zzk1802065k

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Berger J (2018) Effect of preferential vaporization during laser rewelding on the solidification and cracking response of type 304L stainless steel alloys with systematically varied manganese contents, Masters Thesis, The Ohio State University

  16. Lippold JC (1994) Solidification behavior and cracking susceptibility of pulsed-laser welds in austenitic stainless steels. Weld J 73(6):129s–139s

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elmer JW, Allen SM, Eagar TW (1989) Microstructural development during solidification of stainless steel alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 20, 2117–2131. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Suutala N (1983) Effect of solidification conditions on the solidification mode in austenitic stainless steels. Metall Trans A 14:191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Muthupandi V, Bala Srinivasan P, Seshadri SK, Sundaresan S (2003) Effect of weld metal chemistry and heat input on the structure and properties of duplex stainless steel welds. Mater Sci Eng A 358(1–2):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00077-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taban E, Kaluc E (2011) Welding behaviour of duplex and superduplex stainless steels using laser and plasma arc welding processes. Weld World 55(7–8):48–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Keskitalo M, Mäntyjärvi K, Sundqvist J, Powell J, Kaplan AFH (2015) Laser welding of duplex stainless steel with nitrogen as shielding gas. J Mater Process Technol 216:381–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakao Y, Nishimoto K, Zhang WP (1988) Effects of rapid solidification by laser surface melting on solidification modes and microstructures of stainless steels. Trans Japan Weld Soc 19(2): 20–26

  23. David SA, Vitek JM, Boatner LA, Rappaz M (1995) Application of single crystals to achieve quantitative understanding of weld microstructures. Mater Sci Technol 11(9):939–948. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1995.11.9.939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. David SA, Vitek JM, Babu SS, Boatner LA, Reed RW (1997) Welding of nickel base superalloy single crystals. Sci Technol Weld Join 2(2):79–88. https://doi.org/10.1179/stw.1997.2.2.79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rappaz M, David SA, Vitek JM, Boatner LA (1989) Development of microstructures in Fe-15Ni-15Cr single crystal electron beam welds. Metall Trans A 20:1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rappaz M, David SA, Vitek JM, Boatner LA (1990) Analysis of solidification microstructures in Fe-Ni-Cr single-crystal welds. Metall Trans A 21:1767–1782. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02672593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kou Sindo (2003) Welding Metallurgy, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patterson T (2021) Understanding weld formation and microstructure evolution in laser welded stainless steels and Ti-6Al-4V, PhD Dissertation, The Ohio State University

  29. PRIMES GmbH, FocusMonitor FM+, https://www.primes.de/en/products/beam-distribution/focus-measurement/focusmonitor-fmplus.html (accessed Nov. 02, 2021)

  30. International Standards Organization, ISO 11146–1:2005 Lasers and laser-related equipment – test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios – part1: stigmatic and simple astigmatic beams. International Standards Organization, 2005

  31. ASTM E1019–11: standard test methods for determination of carbon, sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen in steel and in steel, iron, nickel, and cobalt alloys by various combustion and fusion techniques. West Conshohocken, PA, United States: ASTM International, 2011

  32. Kujanpää V, Suutala N, Takalo T, Moisio T (1979) Correlation between solidification cracking and microstructure in austenitic and austenitic-ferritic stainless steel welds. Weld Res Int 9(2):55–75

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hammar O, Svennson U (1979) Influence of steel composition on segregation and microstructure during solidification of austenitic stainless steels. Solidif Cast Met 192: 401–410

  34. Knyazeva M, Pohl M (2013) Duplex steels. Part II: carbides and nitrides. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 2(5):343–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-013-0088-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodelas JM, Maguire MC, Michael JR (2014) Deformation‐induced martensite formation in austenitic stainless steel welds. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1115084 (accessed Nov. 02, 2021)

  36. Kotecki DJ, Siewert TA (1992) WRC-1992 Constitution diagram for stainless steel weld metals: a modification of the WRC-1988 diagram. Weld J 71(5):171s–178s

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) for providing financial support and recognize the contributions of Dr. Matt Johnson and Dr. David Tung who served as the LANL mentors for this project. Also, the authors thank IPG Photonics®, specifically, Kevin Arnold and the Midwest Operations group for their support of OSU’s high-power laser lab.

Electron microscopy was performed at the Center for Electron Microscopy and Analysis (CEMAS) at the Ohio State University.

Funding

This research was supported through the National Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC): Manufacturing and Materials Joining Innovation Center (MA2JIC) under grant number 1822144.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tate Patterson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended for publication by Commission IX - Behaviour of Metals Subjected to Welding

Appendix

Appendix

Suutala Creq/Nieq equivalency formula [32]

$$\begin{array}{c}{Cr}_{eq.}=Cr+1.37Mo+1.5Si+2Nb+3Ti\\ {Ni}_{eq.}=Ni+0.31Mn+22C+14.2N+Cu\end{array}$$

Hammar and Svennson Creq/Nieq equivalency formula [33]

$$\begin{array}{c}{\mathrm{Cr}}_{\mathrm{eq}.}=\mathrm{Cr}+1.37\mathrm{Mo}\\ {\mathrm{Ni}}_{\mathrm{eq}.}=\mathrm{Ni}+0.31\mathrm{Mn}+22\mathrm{C}+14.2\mathrm{N}\end{array}$$

WRC-1992 Creq/Nieq equivalency formula [36]

$$\begin{array}{c}{\mathrm{Cr}}_{\mathrm{eq}.}=\mathrm{Cr}+\mathrm{Mo}+0.7\mathrm{Nb}\\ {\mathrm{Ni}}_{\mathrm{eq}.}=\mathrm{Ni}+35\mathrm{C}+20\mathrm{N}+0.25\mathrm{Cu}\end{array}$$
Fig. 16
figure 16

Analysis of potential deformation-induced martensite in 304L (a) and M58 (b) by depositing a hardness indent (HV1.0) in the as-polished material

Fig. 17
figure 17

Comparison of ferrite content and grain size in the same heat of 304L (a) and M58 (b) with a HV1.0 hardness indent showing no indication of deformation-induced martensite. The 304L section contained a very high amount of ferrite. A comparison to the same heat at another location is shown in Fig. 18

Fig. 18
figure 18

EBSD scan of 304L base material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patterson, T., Lippold, J. & Panton, B. Laser weld formation and microstructure evolution in stainless steel alloys. Weld World 66, 1521–1534 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-022-01285-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-022-01285-6

Keywords

Navigation