Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of OXIS contacts-a comparison of three methods

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare OXIS contacts by means of Replication using Sectional die Models (RSM) and Photographs of the Models (PM) with Direct Clinical Examination (DCE) in a sample of preschool children aged 3–4 years.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using existing records of sectional die models and their photographs among 4257 contacts of 1104 caries-free pre-school children. Two calibrated examiners scored the contacts between the distal surface of the primary first molar and mesial surface of the primary second molar using OXIS criteria from the occlusal view using the RSM & PM methods. These were compared to the OXIS scores from DCE method which was available from previous records. Kappa agreement was used to compare results obtained RSM and PM methods with DCE.

Results

The kappa agreement between the RSM and DCE methods was 98.48%; and between the PM and DCE methods was 99.42%, both of which indicated perfect agreement.

Conclusion

The RSM and PM methods were found to have an excellent agreement in scoring OXIS contacts when compared to the DCE method. PM was found to be slightly more accurate than the RSM method for scoring OXIS contacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article or available as supplementary files. Further inquiries may be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  • Allison PJ, Schwartz S. Interproximal contact points and proximal caries in posterior primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(4):334–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon AD. Replication technique for studying microstructure in fossil enamel. Scanning Microsc. 1987;1(2):663–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golkari A, Sabokseir A, Pakshir HR, Dean MC, Sheiham A, Watt RG. A comparison of photographic, replication and direct clinical examination methods for detecting developmental defects of enamel. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kirthiga M, Muthu MS, Kayalvizhi G, Krithika C. Proposed classification for interproximal contacts of primary molars using CBCT: a pilot study. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kirthiga M, Muthu MS, Lee JJC, Kayalvizhi G, Mathur VP, Song JS, Shin K, Praveen R. Prevalence and correlation of OXIS contacts using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and photographs. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021;31(4):520–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu MS, Kirthiga M, Kayalvizhi G, Mathur VP. OXIS classification of interproximal contacts of primary molars and its prevalence in 3–4 year old children. Pediatr Dent. 2020;42:197–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam P, Babu GKL, Nagarathna J. Interdental spacing and dental caries in the primary dentition of 4- to 6-year-old children. J Dent (tehran). 2012;9(3):207–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walia T, Kirthiga M, Brigi C, Muthu MS, Odeh R, Pakash Mathur V, Rodrigues S. Interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on OXIS classification - a two centre cross-sectional study. Wellcome Open Res. 2021;3(5):285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren JJ, Slayton RL, Yonezu T, Kanellis MJ, Levy SM. Interdental spacing and caries in the primary dentition. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(2):109–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors also thank Mrs. Jothi, MSc Statistics, SCARF Research Foundation, and Chennai for their assistance with the statistical analysis. This study was funded by the DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance (IA/CPHE/17/1/503352).

Funding

DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KM contributed to the conception, design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript; RT contributed to the conception, design, funding acquisition, literature search, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript; SS, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, critically revised the manuscript; MSM contributed to data analysis and interpretation, critically revised the manuscript. All authors have made substantive contribution to this study and manuscript, and all have reviewed the final paper prior to its submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Muthu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirthiga, M., Tejasvi, R., Srivarshani, S. et al. Assessment of OXIS contacts-a comparison of three methods. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 24, 507–511 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-023-00805-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-023-00805-2

Keywords

Navigation