Skip to main content
Log in

The clinical impairment assessment questionnaire: validation in Italian patients with eating disorders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) is a measure of functional impairment secondary to eating disorder symptoms.

Aim

The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric proprieties of the Italian-language version of the CIA.

Methods

The tool was translated into Italian and administered to 259 Italian-speaking in- and outpatients with eating disorders and 102 healthy controls. The clinical group also completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI).

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit for the original three-factor structure. Internal consistency was high for both the global CIA and all subscale scores, and test–retest reliability was acceptable. The high correlation between CIA and EDE-Q and BSI confirmed the convergent validity of the instrument. T test indicated higher raw scores on CIA in patients with eating disorders than healthy controls, and a cut-off score of 16 on the CIA discriminated between eating disorder and general psychopathology scores. Finally, global CIA and subscale scores were significantly higher in patients who reported objective bulimic episodes, purging behaviours, and excessive exercising than in those who did not; in underweight than in not-underweight patients, and in inpatients than outpatients, confirming the good known-groups validity of the tool.

Conclusions

Overall, the study showed the good psychometric properties of the Italian version of the CIA, and validated its use in Italian-speaking eating disorder patients.

Level of Evidence

Level V, Descriptive study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHOQOL (1995) The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 41(10):1403–1409

  2. Ro O, Bang L, Reas DL, Rosenvinge JH (2012) The impact of age and BMI on impairment due to disordered eating in a large female community sample. Eat Behav 13(4):342–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT (1993) The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 306(6890):1440–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bohn K, Doll HA, Cooper Z, O’Connor M, Palmer RL, Fairburn CG (2008) The measurement of impairment due to eating disorder psychopathology. Behav Res Ther 46(10):1105–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Abraham SF, Brown T, Boyd C, Luscombe G, Russell J (2006) Quality of life: eating disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 40(2):150–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01762.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adair CE, Marcoux GC, Cram BS, Ewashen CJ, Chafe J, Cassin SE, Pinzon J, Gusella JL, Geller J, Scattolon Y, Fergusson P, Styles L, Brown KE (2007) Development and multi-site validation of a new condition-specific quality of life measure for eating disorders. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Engel SG, Wittrock DA, Crosby RD, Wonderlich SA, Mitchell JE, Kolotkin RL (2006) Development and psychometric validation of an eating disorder-specific health-related quality of life instrument. Int J Eat Disord 39(1):62–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Las Hayas C, Quintana JM, Padierna A, Bilbao A, Munoz P, Madrazo A, Urresti B, Cook EF (2006) The new questionnaire health-related quality of life for eating disorders showed good validity and reliability. J Clin Epidemiol 59(2):192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jenkins PE (2013) Psychometric validation of the Clinical Impairment Assessment in a UK eating disorder service. Eat Behav 14(2):241–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vannucci A, Kass AE, Sinton MM, Aspen V, Weisman H, Bailey JO, Wilfley DE, Taylor CB (2012) An examination of the clinical impairment assessment among women at high risk for eating disorder onset. Behav Res Ther 50(6):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.02.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmoodi M, Moloodi R, Ghaderi A, Babai Z, Saleh Z, Alasti H, Naghashian F, Mohammadpour Z (2016) The Persian Version of Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and Clinical Impairment Assessment: Norms and Psychometric Properties for Undergraduate Women. Iran J Psychiatry 11(2):67–74

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin J, Padierna A, Unzurrunzaga A, Gonzalez N, Berjano B, Quintana JM (2015) Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire. Appetite 91:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Welch E, Birgegard A, Parling T, Ghaderi A (2011) Eating disorder examination questionnaire and clinical impairment assessment questionnaire:general population and clinical norms for young adult women in Sweden. Behav Res Ther 49(2):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reas DL, Ro O, Kapstad H, Lask B (2010) Psychometric properties of the clinical impairment assessment: norms for young adult women. Int J Eat Disord 43(1):72–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Becker AE, Thomas JJ, Bainivualiku A, Richards L, Navara K, Roberts AL, Gilman SE, Striegel-Moore RH, Group HFS (2010) Validity and reliability of a Fijian translation and adaptation of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire. Int J Eat Disord 43(2):171–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahlgren CL, Stedal K, Ro O (2017) Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and Clinical Impairment Assessment(CIA): clinical norms and functional impairment in male and female adults with eating disorders. Nord J Psychiatry 71(4):256–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2016.1271452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5™). American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington

  18. Garner DM, Olmsted MP, Bohr Y, Garfinkel PE (1982) The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol Med 12(4):871–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saporetti G, Sancini S, Bassoli L, Castelli B, Pellai A (2004) [Risk assessment for eating disorders in a high school: a study based on the Eating Attitudes Test 26]. Minerva Pediatr 56(1):83–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ (2008) Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. In: Fairburn CG (ed) Eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0). Guiford Press, New York, pp 309–313

    Google Scholar 

  21. Calugi S, Milanese C, Sartirana M, El Ghoch M, Sartori F, Geccherle E, Coppini A, Franchini C, Dalle Grave R (2016) The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Italian version. Eat Weight Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0276-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Leo D, Frisoni GB, Rozzini R, Trabucchi M (1993) Italian community norms for the Brief Symptom Inventory in the elderly. Br J Clin Psychol 32(Pt 2):209–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N (1983) The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med 13(3):595–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Derogatis LR, Cleary PA (1977) Factorial invariance across gender for the primary symptom dimensions of the SCL-90. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 16(4):347–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reas DL, Stedal K, Lindvall Dahlgren C, Ro O (2016) Impairment due to eating disorder pathology: Identifying the cut-off score on the Clinical Impairment Assessment in a clinical and community sample. Int J Eat Disord 49(6):635–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hilton A, Skrutkowski M (2002) Translating instruments into other languages: development and testing processes. Cancer Nurs 25(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu LBP (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen Y, Aranovich GL, Donohue MD (2007) Liquid-vapor density profiles from equilibrium limit of diffusion equation for interacting particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 307(1):34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.11.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6(1):53–60

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cronbach L (1951) Coefficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(2):297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McDonald R (1999) Test theory: a unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Inc., Mahwan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simona Calugi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal rights statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calugi, S., Sartirana, M., Milanese, C. et al. The clinical impairment assessment questionnaire: validation in Italian patients with eating disorders. Eat Weight Disord 23, 685–694 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0477-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0477-2

Keywords

Navigation