Skip to main content
Log in

Muscle thickness contribution to sit-to-stand ability in institutionalized older adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Ultrasound is a low-cost, safe and accessible tool to use on muscle mass assessment. The relations between muscle thickness and lower limb function have not been investigated in institutionalized elderly people.

Aim

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the associations among sit-to-stand capacity, ultrasound-measured rectus femoris muscle thickness, hand grip strength and anthropometrics in a population of institutionalized older adults.

Methods

Twelve older adults (nine women and three men, mean age ± SD 86 ± 7 years, body mass index 24 ± 3 kg/m2) participated in this cross-sectional study. Sit-to-stand capacity using five-repetition sit-to-stand test, rectus femoris muscle thickness using B-mode ultrasonography, handgrip and anthropometric were measured. The relationships of the variables were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression analysis.

Results

Significant bivariate correlations were found between rectus femoris muscle thickness and sit-to-stand test (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed associations between rectus femoris muscle thickness and sit-to-stand test, after adjusting by body mass index and age (p < 0.0001).

Discussion

Rectus femoris thickness in contraction adjusted by body mass index and age was predictors of physical performance. The independent variables shared 78.6% of variance in the sit-to-stand test.

Conclusions

Rectus femoris muscle thickness measured with ultrasonography, body mass index and age could explain functionality in institutionalized older adults measured by five-repetition sit-to-stand test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Doherty TJ (2003) Invited review: aging and sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 95:1717–1727. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00347.2003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J et al (2019) Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 48:16–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Michel J-P (2013) Sarcopenia: a useful paradigm for physical frailty. Eur Geriatr Med 4:102–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2013.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang K-V, Hsu T-H, Wu W-T et al (2016) Association between sarcopenia and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 17:1164.e7–1164.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang K-V, Hsu T-H, Wu W-T et al (2017) Is sarcopenia associated with depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Age Ageing 46:738–746. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saka B, Ozkaya H, Karisik E et al (2016) Malnutrition and sarcopenia are associated with increased mortality rate in nursing home residents: a prospective study. Eur Geriatr Med 7:232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2015.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang K-V, Chen J-D, Wu W-T et al (2018) Association between loss of skeletal muscle mass and mortality and tumor recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Cancer 7:90–103. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang ZM et al (2000) Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 years. J Appl Physiol 89:81–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abe T, Loenneke JP, Thiebaud RS et al (2014) Age-related site-specific muscle wasting of upper and lower extremities and trunk in Japanese men and women. Age 36:813–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-013-9600-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abe T, Patterson KM, Stover CD et al (2014) Site-specific thigh muscle loss as an independent phenomenon for age-related muscle loss in middle-aged and older men and women. Age. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-014-9634-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang K-V, Wu W-T, Huang K-C et al (2018) Limb muscle quality and quantity in elderly adults with dynapenia but not sarcopenia: an ultrasound imaging study. Exp Gerontol 108:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2018.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Minetto MA, Caresio C, Menapace T et al (2015) Ultrasound-based detection of low muscle mass for diagnosis of sarcopenia in older adults. PMR. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bohannon RW (1995) Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Mot Skills 80:163–166. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1995.80.1.163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S et al (2003) Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 95:1851–1860. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00246.2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alley DE, Shardell MD, Peters KW et al (2014) Grip strength cutpoints for the identification of clinically relevant weakness. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:559–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glu011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Buford TW, Lott DJ, Marzetti E et al (2012) Age-related differences in lower extremity tissue compartments and associations with physical function in older adults. Exp Gerontol 47:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2011.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abe T, Loenneke JP, Thiebaud RS (2015) Morphological and functional relationships with ultrasound measured muscle thickness of the lower extremity: a brief review. Ultrasound 23:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X15587599

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Strasser EM, Draskovits T, Praschak M et al (2013) Association between ultrasound measurements of muscle thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity and skeletal muscle strength in the elderly. Age 35:2377–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-013-9517-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rech A, Radaelli R, Goltz FR et al (2014) Echo intensity is negatively associated with functional capacity in older women. Age. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-014-9708-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Abe T, Thiebaud RS, Loenneke JP et al (2014) Association between forearm muscle thickness and age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass, handgrip and knee extension strength and walking performance in old men and women: a pilot study. Ultrasound Med Biol 40:2069–2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lopez P, Wilhelm EN, Rech A et al (2017) Echo intensity independently predicts functionality in sedentary older men. Muscle Nerve 55:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilhelm EN, Rech A, Minozzo F et al (2014) Relationship between quadriceps femoris echo intensity, muscle power, and functional capacity of older men. Age. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-014-9625-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ikezoe T, Asakawa Y, Fukumoto Y et al (2011) Associations of muscle stiffness and thickness with muscle strength and muscle power in elderly women. Geriatr Gerontol Int 12:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00735.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ross W, Hebbelinck M, Faulkner R (1978) Kinantropometry terminology and landmarks. Charles Tomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  25. Csuka M, McCarty DJ (1985) Simple method for measurement of lower extremity muscle strength. Am J Med 78:77–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reis MM, Arantes PMM (2011) Assessment of hand grip strength-validity and reliability of the saehan dynamometer. Fisioter E Pesqui 18:176–181. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502011000200013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fess E (1992) Grip strength. In: Casanova JS (ed) Clinical assessment recommendations, 2nd edn. American Society of Hand Therapists, Chicago, pp 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  28. Perkisas S, Baudry S, Bauer J et al (2018) Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: towards standardized measurements. Eur Geriatr Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-018-0104-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arts IMP, Pillen S, Schelhaas HJ et al (2010) Normal values for quantitative muscle ultrasonography in adults. Muscle Nerve 41:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.21458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J (1983) Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 338:37–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Taekema DG, Gussekloo J, Maier AB et al (2010) Handgrip strength as a predictor of functional, psychological and social health. A prospective population-based study among the oldest old. Age Ageing 39:331–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lopez P, Wilhelm EN, Rech A et al (2016) Echo intensity independently predicts functionality in sedentary older men. Muscle Nerve. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Saito A, Ema R, Inami T et al (2016) Anatomical cross-sectional area of the quadriceps femoris and sit-to-stand test score in middle-aged and elderly population: development of a predictive equation. J Physiol Anthropol 36:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-016-0099-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Y, Guo J, Duanmu Y et al (2019) Quantitative analysis of modified functional muscle-bone unit and back muscle density in patients with lumbar vertebral fracture in Chinese elderly men: a case-control study. Aging Clin Exp Res 31:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-018-1024-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Santanasto AJ, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevsky SB et al (2017) Body composition remodeling and mortality: the health aging and body composition study. J Gerontol Ser A 72:513–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glw163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Malas FÜ, Özçakar L, Kaymak B et al (2013) Effects of different strength training on muscle architecture: clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation in knee osteoarthritis. PMR 5:655–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fiatarone MA, O’Neill EF, Ryan ND et al (1994) Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med 330:1769–1775. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199406233302501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Macaluso A, Vito GD (2004) Muscle strength, power and adaptations to resistance training in older people. Eur J Appl Physiol 91:450–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0991-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the individuals who participated in this study.

Funding

This work was partial financial supported by the Erasmus+ Strategic Partnership for Higher Education Program (Key Action 203) [Grant number: 2018-1-PL01-KA203-051055].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Each author contributed individually and significantly to the development of this article. Substantial contribution in the conception or design of the study, or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the study; writing or critically reviewing the article and its intellectual content; final approval of the version of the manuscript to be published; agreeing to take responsibility for all aspects of the study, in the sense of guaranteeing that any issues related to the integrity or precision of any portion of the study were duly studied and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Galán-Mercant.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Statement of human and animal rights

The study has been approved by the appropriate institutional research ethics committee and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mateos-Angulo, A., Galán-Mercant, A. & Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. Muscle thickness contribution to sit-to-stand ability in institutionalized older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 32, 1477–1483 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01328-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01328-x

Keywords

Navigation