Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Study of Evolutionary Algorithms for the Automatic Calibration of the Medbasin-D Conceptual Hydrological Model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Processes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The calibration of a hydrological model is an important task for obtaining accurate runoff simulation results for a specific watershed. Several optimisation algorithms have been applied during the last years for the automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff (CRR) models. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and the efficiency of three evolutionary algorithms, namely the Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE), the Genetic Algorithms (GA) and the Evolutionary Annealing-Simplex (EAS), for the calibration of the Medbasin-D daily CRR model. An improved calibration approach of Medbasin-D is presented, including a batch-processing module which enables the implementation of coupled simulation-optimisation routines. The enhanced Medbasin calibration module is employed in a watershed of the island of Crete (Greece), using several objective functions in order to test the optimisation algorithms under different hydrological flow conditions. The results reveal that, in terms of effectiveness, SCE and EAS performed equally well, while GA provided slightly worse optimal solutions. However, GA was computationally more efficient than SCE and EAS. Despite the discrepancies among the optimisation runs, the simulated hydrographs had a very similar response for the optimal parameter sets obtained by the same calibration criteria, indicating that all tested optimisation methods produce equally successful results with Medbasin-D model. Additionally, the selected objective function seems to have a more decisive effect on the final simulation outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Faraj FAM, Scholz M, Tigkas D (2014) Sensitivity of surface runoff to drought and climate change: application for shared river basins. Water 6(10):3033–3048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Faraj FAM, Tigkas D, Scholz M (2015) Sensitivity of irrigation requirements to improvement in irrigation efficiency in climate-induced changes: example of a transboundary watershed. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of EWRA, 10–13 June 2015, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Boyle DP, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (2000) Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods. Water Resour Res 36(12):3663–3674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks KN, Ffolliott PF, Magner JA (2013) Hydrology and the management of watersheds. 4th edition. Wiley

  • Chowdhury Ρ, Eslamian S (2014) Climate change and hydrologic modeling. In: Eslamian S (ed) Handbook of engineering hydrology II: modeling, climate change and variability. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 71–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christelis V, Mantoglou A (2016) Coastal aquifer management based on the joint use of density-dependent and sharp interface models. Water Resour Manag 30(2):861–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu W, Gao X, Sorooshian S (2010) Improving the shuffled complex evolution scheme for optimization of complex nonlinear hydrological systems: application to the calibration of the Sacramento soil-moisture accounting model. Water Resour Res 46(9), W09530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu W, Gao X, Sorooshian S (2011) A new evolutionary search strategy for global optimization of high-dimensional problems. Inform Sci 181(22):4909–4927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakhlaoui H, Bargaoui Z, Bárdossy A (2012) Toward a more efficient calibration schema for HBV rainfall–runoff model. J Hydrol 444:161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta V (1992) Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 28(4):1015–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1994) Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. J Hydrol 158:265–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumedah G, Berg AA, Wineberg M, Collier R (2010) Selecting model parameter sets from a trade-off surface generated from the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Water Resour Manag 24:4469–4489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D (2002) An evolutionary annealing-simplex algorithm for global optimization of water resource systems. Proceeedings of the Fifth International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Cardiff, UK, International Water Association Publishing 2:1423–1428

  • Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D (2008) Fitting hydrological models on multiple responses using the multiobjective evolutionary annealing-simplex approach. In: Practical hydroinformatics. Springer, Berlin, p 259–273

  • Franchini M, Galeati G (1997) Comparing several genetic algorithm schemes for the calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Sci J 42(3):357–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchini M, Galeati G, Berra S (1998) Global optimization techniques for the calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Sci J 43(3):443–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan TY, Biftu GF (1996) Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: optimization algorithms, catchment conditions and model structure. Water Resour Res 32(12):3513–3524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Zhou J, Zou Q, Liu Y, Song L (2013) A novel multi-objective shuffled complex differential evolution algorithm with application to hydrological model parameter optimization. Water Resour Manag 27(8):2923–2946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO (1998) Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resour Res 34(4):751–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Hogue TS, Boyle DP (2003) Advances in automatic calibration of watershed models. In: Duan Q et al (eds) Calibration of watershed models. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 9–28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical genetic algorithms. 2nd Edition, Wiley

  • Kaini P, Artita K, Nicklow JW (2012) Optimizing structural best management practices using SWAT and genetic algorithm to improve water quality goals. Water Resour Manag 26:1827–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause P, Boyle DP, Bäse F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczera G (1997) Efficient subspace probabilistic parameters optimization for catchment models. Water Resour Res 33(1):177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado AR, Wendland E, Krause P (2016) Hydrologic simulation for water balance improvement in an outcrop area of the Guarani Aquifer system. Environ Process 3(1):19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen H (2000) Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model using multiple objectives. J Hydrol 235(3):276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen H, Wilson G, Ammentorp HC (2002) Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models. J Hydrol 261:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathworks (2010) MATLAB global optimization toolbox

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muleta MK (2012) Model performance sensitivity to objective function during automated calibrations. J Hydrol Eng 17(6):756–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbantis I, Efstratiadis A, Rozos E, Kopsiafti M, Koutsoyiannis D (2011) Holistic versus monomeric strategies for hydrological modelling of human-modified hydrosystems. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(3):743–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pangalou D, Tigkas D, Vangelis H, Tsakiris G, Nanou-Giannarou A (2009) Drought severity thresholds and drought management in Greece. In: Iglesias et al (eds) Coping with drought risk in agriculture and water supply systems. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 243–256

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Price WL (1987) Global optimization algorithms for a CAD workstation. J Optim Theory Appl 55(1):133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012) Numerical assessment of metamodeling strategies in computationally intensive optimization. Environ Model Softw 34:67–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reshma T, Reddy KV, Pratap D, Ahmedi M, Agilan V (2015) Optimization of calibration parameters for an event based watershed model using genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manag 29(13):4589–4606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozos E, Efstratiadis A, Nalbantis I, Koutsoyiannis D (2004) Calibration of a semi-distributed model for conjunctive simulation of surface and groundwater flows. Hydrol Sci J 49(5):819–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B, Jayawardena AW, Fernando TMKG (2002) River flow forecasting: use of phase-space reconstruction and artificial neural networks approaches. J Hydrol 265:225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1983) Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: the question of parameter observability and uniqueness. Water Resour Res 19(1):260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Reed P, Wagener T (2006) How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10(2):289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thyer M, Kuczera G, Bates BC (1999) Probabilistic optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: a comparison of the shuffled complex evolution and simulated annealing algorithms. Water Resour Res 35(3):767–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tigkas D, Tsakiris G (2004) Medbasin: a Mediterranean rainfall – runoff software package. Eur Water 5–6:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigkas D, Tsakiris G (2006) Medbasin II: an integrated rainfall – runoff software package for watershed management. Geophys Res Abstr 8:00742

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigkas D, Vangelis H, Tsakiris G (2012) Drought and climatic change impact on streamflow in small watersheds. Sci Total Environ 440:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tigkas D, Christelis V, Tsakiris G (2015a) The global optimisation approach for calibrating hydrological models: the case of Medbasin-D model. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of EWRA, 10–13 June 2015, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Tigkas D, Vangelis H, Tsakiris G (2015a) DrinC: a software for drought analysis based on drought indices. Earth Sci Inf 8(3):697–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolson BA, Shoemaker CA (2007) Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration. Water Resour Res 43(1), W01413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris G, Tigkas D, Pangalou D (2004) On the assessment of climatic and drought scenarios on runoff in Mediterranean island river basins. In: Harmancioglu N et al (eds), Proceedings of EWRA international symposium, Water Resources Management: Risks and Challenges for the 21st century, Izmir, Turkey, p. 627–637

  • Tsakiris G, Tigkas D, Spiliotis M (2006) Assessment of interconnection between two adjacent watersheds using deterministic and fuzzy approaches. Eur Water 15–16:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Bastidas LA, Bouten W, Sorooshian S (2003a) Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models. Water Resour Res 39(8):1214

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Bouten W, Sorooshian S (2003b) A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour Res 39(8):1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener T, Wheater HS, Gupta HV (2003) Identification and evaluation of watershed models. In: Duan Q et al (eds) Calibration of watershed models. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 29–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang QJ (1997) Using genetic algorithms to optimise model parameters. Environ Model Softw 12(1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yapo PO, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (1996) Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data. J Hydrol 181:23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Srinivasan R, Zhao K, Liew MV (2009) Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model. Hydrol Process 23(3):430–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An initial version of this paper has been presented at the 9th World Congress of the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) “Water Resources Management in a Changing World: Challenges and Opportunities”, Istanbul, Turkey, June 10–13, 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Reclamation Works & Water Resources Management and Centre for the Assessment of Natural Hazards & Proactive Planning, School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytechniou 9, 157 80, Zografou, Athens, Greece

    Dimitris Tigkas, Vasileios Christelis & George Tsakiris

Authors
  1. Dimitris Tigkas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vasileios Christelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. George Tsakiris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Tigkas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tigkas, D., Christelis, V. & Tsakiris, G. Comparative Study of Evolutionary Algorithms for the Automatic Calibration of the Medbasin-D Conceptual Hydrological Model. Environ. Process. 3, 629–644 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-016-0147-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-016-0147-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation