Abstract
Most of the previous studies on the curved front Pile-Supported Breakwaters (PSB) dealt with the wave transmission past the structure and wave reflection. Fewer studies have reported wave-induced pressures on the front face of curved front PSB. The structure geometry and a limited number of pressure port locations are the uncertainties in integrating the measured dynamic pressures on the front face for obtaining the wave force. Therefore, in the present study, the wave-induced pressures, total forces, and moments on a circular cum parabola shape pile-supported breakwater (CPS-PSB) model are investigated through experiments carried out in a wave flume. The CPS-PSB is subjected to the action of regular waves in intermediate to deep-water conditions. The effect of integrating a tubular wave screen (TWS) on its seaside is also studied. It is found that the CPS-PSB experiences more vertical force for a higher submergence depth and the maximum vertical force is about 1.2 times the maximum horizontal force. The presence of TWS reduces the vertical force for the higher relative submergence, with a maximum reduction of about 50%, which still does not significantly reduce the horizontal force on CPS-PSB even though the pressures are reduced on the concave profile. There is also an increase in the magnitude of vertical forces in the presence of TWS with a reduction in h/d for long waves. The trend in the variation of the moment is similar to that of the horizontal force. The CPS-PSB in the absence of the wave screen is suggested as a better option for application in deeper waters.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- a :
-
Height of the superstructure from beam top
- B :
-
Width of the breakwater (i.e., length along the wave direction)
- D :
-
Pile diameter
- d :
-
Water depth
- D T :
-
Diameter of the tubular section in wave screen
- F H :
-
Horizontal force
- F V :
-
Vertical force
- h :
-
Depth of submergence of the superstructure
- H i :
-
Incident wave height
- L :
-
Wave length
- M :
-
Inline moment
- P sh :
-
Peak pressure (shoreward)
- r :
-
Pile height up to beam top
- s :
-
Pile spacing in the transverse direction
- s T :
-
Clear spacing between the tubular sections in wave screen
- T :
-
Wave period
- z :
-
Elevation from still water level
- η :
-
Wave elevation
- λ :
-
Length of the breakwater
References
Anand KV, Sundar V, Sannasiraj SA (2011) Hydrodynamic characteristics of curved-front seawall models compared with vertical seawall under regular waves. J Coast Res 27(6):1103–1112
Balaji R, Sundar V (2004) Theoretical and experimental investigation on the wave transmission through slotted screens. Ocean Eng 8(2):69–90
Dean RG, Dalrymple RA (1991) Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists. World Scientific, River Edge
Goda Y (1974) New wave pressure formulae for composite breakwater. ASCE, Copenhagen, vol 282, pp 1702–1720
Goda Y (2010) Random seas and design of maritime structures, 3rd edn. World Scientific, River Edge
Hayashi T, Hattori M, Kano T, Shirai M (1966) Hydraulic research on closely spaced pile breakwaters. In: Proceedings of 10th conference on coastal engineering, Tokyo, Japan, vol 50. ASCE, pp 873–884
Herbich JB, Doughlas B (1988) Wave transmission through a double row pile breakwater. In: Proceedings of 21st conference on coastal engineering, Costa del Sol-Malaga, Spain, vol 165. ASCE, pp 2229–2241
Holman JP, Gajda WJ Jr (1989) Experimental methods for engineers, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Koraim AS (2014) Hydraulic characteristics of pile-supported L-shaped bars used as a screen breakwater. Ocean Eng 83:36–51
Krishnakumar C, Sundar V, Sannasiraj SA (2010) Hydrodynamic performance of single and double-wave screens. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 136(1):59–65
Kudale M (2010) Impact of port development on the coastline and the need for protection. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci 39:597–604
Nakamura T, Kohno T, Morita Y (2001) Performance of a double-walled barrier with a front wall of inclined plate array. In: Proceedings of the 11th international offshore and polar engineering conference, Stavanger, Norway, pp 499–505. ISOPE-I-01-307
Neelamani S, Rajendran R (2002) Wave interaction with T-type breakwaters. Ocean Eng 29(2):151–175
Park H, Tomiczek T, Cox DT, Van de Lindt JW, Lomonaco P (2017) Experimental modelling of horizontal and vertical wave forces on an elevated coastal structure. Coast Eng 128:58–74
Rageh OS, Koraim AS, Salem TN (2009) Hydrodynamic efficiency of partially immersed caissons supported on piles. Ocean Eng 36(14):1112–1118
Ramnarayan SK, Sannasiraj SA, Sundar V (2020) Hydrodynamic characteristics of curved and vertical front face pile-supported breakwaters in regular waves. Ocean Eng 216:108105
Ramnarayan SK, Sannasiraj SA, Sundar V (2022) Hydrodynamic characteristics of concave front pile-supported breakwaters with a tubular wave screen. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 148(1):04021041
Ramnarayan SK, Sundar V, Sannasiraj SA (2021) Hydrodynamic performance characteristics of an oscillating water column device integrated with a pile breakwater. J Ocean Eng Mar Energy 7(3):229–241
Sundar V, Mallayachari V (1994) Pressures due to regular and random waves on a vertical wall. In: Proceedings of the international symposium waves: physical and numerical modelling, Vancouver, Canada, August 21–24, vol 3, pp 1433–1442
Sundar V, Subbarao BVV (2002) Hydrodynamic pressures and forces on quadrant front face pile-supported breakwater. Ocean Eng 29(2):193–214
Teh HM (2013) Hydraulic performance of free surface breakwaters: a review. Sains Malay 42(9):1301–1310
Tutuarima WH, d'Angremond K (1998) Cost comparison of breakwater types. In: Proceedings of 26th conference on coastal engineering, Copenhagen, Denmark. ASCE, pp 1934–1944
Van Weele BJ, Herbich JB (1972) Wave reflection and transmission for pile arrays. In: Proceedings of 13th conference on coastal engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, vol 110. ASCE, pp 1935–1953
Wiebe DM, Park H, Cox DT (2014) Application of the Goda pressure formulae for horizontal wave loads on elevated structures. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(6):1573–1579
Wiegel RL (1961) Closely spaced piles as a breakwater. Dock Harbour Author 42:491
Acknowledgements
A part of the research study is supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST) under the “SPLICE—Climate Change” Program with the reference number DST/CCP/CoE/141/2018(C).
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Shipping, Government of India [Grant No. S2-25021/2/2017-SM]. A part of the research study is supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST) under the “SPLICE—Climate Change” Program with the reference number DST/CCP/CoE/141/2018(C).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Uncertainty analysis
Appendix: Uncertainty analysis
The uncertainty WR of computed variable ‘R’ in an experiment is a function of variables X1, X2,… Xn, each having uncertainties W1, W2, … Wn is given as (Holman and Gajda 1989)
The uncertainties for the various hydrodynamic parameter measurements are presented in Table 2.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Vasanthakumar, S., Karthik Ramnarayan, S., Sannasiraj, S.A. et al. Wave forces on a concave front pile-supported breakwater combined with wave screen under regular waves. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 9, 319–339 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-022-00270-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-022-00270-x