Skip to main content
Log in

Recent Developments in US Hardwood Lumber Markets and Linkages to Housing Construction

  • Wood Structure and Function (S Hiziroglu, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Forestry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The housing industry has long provided important markets for the higher-value hardwood lumber used in fixtures such as cabinets, flooring, and millwork. These markets have become even more important in the face of the decline in furniture manufacture in the USA. The importance of housing and other construction markets to the US hardwood industry is the focus of the current review.

Recent Findings

The housing crisis that began in 2007 (from a construction data perspective) has had a profound impact on the hardwood industry by reducing demand for many products and hardwood industry employment, metrics that recently have started to recover. For higher-value hardwoods, exports have become a critical market in the face of historically low US housing starts. Industrial markets such as pallets and railway ties, traditionally markets for lower-value products, also have increased in relative importance in recent years.

Summary

While housing starts are expected to eventually return to the long-term trend, an analysis of the current marketplace illustrates the importance of the construction markets to the hardwood industry. Potential new markets for emerging products that can make use of hardwoods also are derived from construction-based sectors, so the overall importance of housing and building construction to the hardwood industry is not likely to wane for the foreseeable future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Leamer EE. Housing is the business cycle. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2007; Working Paper 13428. 72 pp.

  2. • Howard JL, McKeever DB. U.S. forest products annual market review and prospects, 2011–2015. USDA For Serv Res Pap FPL-RN-0336, 2015, 11 pp. This paper, in addition to providing commentary and analysis concerning economic conditions for wood products, provides current market share data for all major wood products across all major industries and sectors.

  3. U.S. Census Bureau. Construction spending, historical value put in place. 2016; Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/historical_data.html

  4. Robichaud F, Kozak R, Richelieu A. Wood use in nonresidential construction: a case for communication with architects. For Prod J. 2009;59(1/2):57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schuler A, Adair C. Demographics, the housing market, and demand for building materials. For Prod J. 2003;53(5):8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alderman DR, Bumgardner MS, Baumgras JE. An assessment of the red maple resource in the northeastern United States. North J Appl For. 2005;22(3):181–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luppold WG, Bumgardner MS. Forty years of hardwood lumber consumption: 1963 to 2002. For Prod J. 2008;58(5):7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O’Connor J, Kozak R, Gaston C, Fell D. Wood use in nonresidential buildings: opportunities and barriers. For Prod J. 2004;54(3):19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sinclair SA. Forest products marketing. McGraw-Hill, 1992, 403 pp.

  10. Luppold WG, Bumgardner M, McConnell TE. Impacts of changing hardwood lumber consumption and price on stumpage and sawlog prices in Ohio. For Sci. 2014;60(5):994–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. • Luppold WG, Bumgardner MS. US hardwood lumber consumption and international trade from 1991 to 2014. Wood Fiber Sci. 2016;48(3):162–70. This paper provides recent and historical estimates of US hardwood lumber consumption by major market segments (appearance-based and industrial) and describes the importance of hardwood trade (net exports) to the US hardwood industry. The importance of the housing crisis to hardwood lumber demand is illustrated.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service. Global Agricultural Trade System (GATS) online. 2016; Retrieved from https://apps.fas.usda.gov/gats/default.aspx

  13. Luppold WG, Bumgardner MS. Thirty-nine years of U.S. wood furniture importing: sources and products. Bioresources. 2011;6(4):4895–908.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Luppold WG, Bumgardner MS. Examination of worldwide hardwood lumber production, trade, and apparent consumption: 1995-2013. Wood Fiber Sci. 2015;47(3):283–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. • Wear DN, Prestemon JP, Foster MO. US forest products in the global economy. J For. 2016;114(4):483–93. This paper shows US industrial roundwood consumption in a global context, discussing different cyclical (e.g., housing) and long-run trends (offshore competition) affecting US production. It is concluded that cyclical improvement in housing will benefit US production but offshoring in some major sectors will prevent the US from returning to the peak production levels of the late 1990s .

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luppold WG and Bumgardner M. The international hardwood lumber market and potential impacts on your bottom line. Pallet Enterprise. 2014; December:20,22,24–5.

  17. U.S. Census Bureau. North American Industrial Classification System. 2016; Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/

  18. USDL, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Quarterly census of employment and wages. 2016; Retrieved from http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv?en

  19. Carnes WS, Slifer SD. The atlas of economic indicators. Harper Business, 1991, 232 pp.

  20. U.S. Census Bureau. New residential construction, historical data. 2016; Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/construction/nrc/historical_data/index.html

  21. • Alderman D. Housing and construction. Forest Products Annual Market Review 2015–2016. UNECE/FAO publication ECE/TIM/SP/40; 2016. p. 123–131. This paper is the latest in an annual review of developments in housing and construction markets in Europe, the Russian Federation, and North America. The paper provides recent statistics and outlooks for these markets, which have important implications for wood products markets.

  22. Bumgardner MS, Buehlmann U, Schuler AT, Koenig KM. Impacts of construction markets on firm performance and behaviors in the secondary woodworking industry, 2010–2013. In Groninger JW, Holzmueller EJ, Nielsen CK, Dey DC, editors. Proceedings of the 19th Central Hardwood Forest Conference. USDA For Ser Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-142; 2014. p. 312–321.

  23. Bumgardner M, Buehlmann U, Koenig K. Investment activities in the U.S. secondary woodworking industry. In Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Knapp BO, Larsen DR, Shifley SR, Stelzer HE, editors. Proceedings of the 20th Central Hardwood Forest Conference. USDA For Ser Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-167; 2017. p 184–191.

  24. Buehlmann U, Bumgardner M, Koenig K. Woodworking and housing: positive trends and actions. FDMC. 2016;30(9):52–4,56.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bumgardner M, Buehlmann U. To what do firms attribute success? An application of attribution theory to the secondary woodworking industry. Wood Fiber Sci. 2015;47(1):44–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Esteves BM, Pereira HM. Wood modification by heat treatment: a review. Bioresources. 2009;4(1):370–404.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. • Espinoza O, Buehlmann U, Laguarda-Mallo MF. Thermally modified wood: marketing strategies of U.S. producers. Bioresources. 2015;10(4):6942–52. This paper provides results and discussion of depth interviews with manufacturers and distributors of thermally modified wood products. The qualitative nature of the paper provided details of this emerging market, including uses for specific hardwood species .

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leitch MA. Hardness values for thermally modified treated black ash. Wood Fiber Sci. 2009;41(4):440–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hill CAS. Wood modification: an update. Bioresources. 2011;6(2):918–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mallo MFL, Espinoza O. Outlook for cross-laminated timber in the United States. Bioresources. 2014;9(4):7427–43.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Crespell P, Gagnon S. Cross laminated timber: a primer. Special publication 52. FP Innovation, 2010, 24 pp.

  32. Grasser KK. Development of cross laminated timber in the United States of America. Master’s Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2015, 115 pp.

  33. Mohamadzadeh M, Hindman D. Mechanical performance of yellow-poplar cross laminated timber. Report No. CE/VPI-ST-15-13. Virginia Tech, 2015, 29 pp.

  34. Slavid R. Endless stair. Nick Watts Design and the American Hardwood Export Council, 2013, 51 pp.

  35. Mohammad M, Gagnon S, Douglas BK, Podesto L. Introduction to cross laminated timber. Wood Design Focus. 2012;22(2):3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Espinoza O, Buehlmann U, Mallo MFL, Trujillo VR. Identification of research areas to advance the adoption of cross-laminated timber in North America. BioProducts Business. 2016;1(5):60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wherry G, Buehlmann U. Product life cycle of the manufactured home industry. Bioresources. 2014;9(4):6652–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vogel-Heuser B, Hess D. Industry 4.0 - prerequisites and visions (guest editorial). IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2016;13(2):411–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gilchrist A. Industry 4.0: the industrial internet of things. Apress, 2016, 250 pp.

  40. Almada-Lobo F. The industry 4.0 revolution and the future of manufacturing execution systems (MES). Journal of Innovation Management (JIM). 2016;3(4):16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Foresight. The future of manufacturing: a new era of opportunity and challenge for the UK project report. The Government Office for Science, London, 2013, 248 pp.

  42. Hardwood Market Report. The changing landscape of hardwood markets and its impact on sawmill production. Hardwood Market Executive. 2016;10(11):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Geissbauer R, Vedso J, Schrauf S. A strategist's guide to Industry 4.0. strategy+business. 2016;Summer(83):unnumb. Retrieved from http://www.strategy-business.com/article/A-Strategists-Guide-to-Industry-4.0?gko=7c4cf

  44. Thomas RE. Predicting internal yellow-poplar log defect features using surface indicators. Wood Fiber Sci. 2008;40(1):14–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cai Z, Ross RJ. Mechanical properties of wood-based composite materials. In: Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material, 2010 Edition. Forest Products Society, 2011, p. 12–1-12.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urs Buehlmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Drs. Buehlmann, Bumgardner, Alderman have no conflicts of interests to declare.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Wood Structure and Function

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buehlmann, U., Bumgardner, M. & Alderman, D. Recent Developments in US Hardwood Lumber Markets and Linkages to Housing Construction. Curr Forestry Rep 3, 213–222 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-017-0059-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-017-0059-y

Keywords

Navigation