Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Development in the Dynamic Relationship between Moral Agency and Peer Delinquency

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a change in moral agency was capable of predicting a change in peer delinquency, whether a change in peer delinquency was capable of predicting a change in moral agency, and whether the effects were reciprocal. Based in part on prior research showing that the peer selection effect often precedes the peer influence effect developmentally, it was further hypothesized that a change in moral agency leading to a change in peer delinquency would be stronger than the alternate path during the early years of adolescence. These hypotheses were tested in a group of 1,830 middle school students who were followed from age 12 to age 16 and a group of 2,138 high school students who were followed from age 15 to age 17. Findings were generally supportive of the hypotheses: a change in moral agency led to a change in peer delinquency at all three ages, a change in peer delinquency led to a change in moral agency in mid-to-late adolescence, and peer selection (moral agency → peer delinquency) was significantly stronger than peer influence (peer delinquency → moral agency) in early adolescence but not in middle adolescence or mid-to-late adolescence. These findings suggest that the relationship between moral agency and peer delinquency is dynamic, reciprocal, at least during the latter stages of adolescence, and sequential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are available though the ICPSR website (icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages) for the GREAT (ICPSR 3337) and Y&D (ICPSR 8255) studies.

References

  • Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. E. (2016). An introduction to the Moral Agency Scale: Individual differences in moral agency and their relationship to related moral constructs, free will, and blame attribution. Social Psychology, 47(6), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiCiccio, T. J., & Efron, B. (1996). Bootstrap confidence intervals. Statistical Science, 11(3), 189–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esbensen, F.-A. (2002). National evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) program: Final Report (94-IJ-CX-0058). U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Risk, promotive, and protective factors in youth offending: Results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2019). Selection and influence: A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(2), 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gault-Sherman, M. (2012). It’s a two-way street: The bidirectional relationship between parenting and delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence., 41(2), 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford-Smith, M., Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & McCord, J. (2005). Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, K. A., & Landau, S. (2010). Prosocial behavior and peer rejection: Information and strategies for parents and teachers. Helping Children at Home and School, 12, SS1–SS4.

  • Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gremmen, M. C., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2017). First selection, then influence: Developmental differences in friendship dynamics regarding academic achievement. Developmental Psychology, 53(7), 1356–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundmeyer, T., & Yankey, J. (2016). Revitalizing the school-parent partnership: A participatory action research study using virtual parent-teacher conferences. International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 23, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 99–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeben, E. M., Meldrum, R. C., Walker, D., & Young, J. T. N. (2016). The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corporation. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Author.

  • Kiesner, J., Poulin, F., & Nicotra, E. (2003). Peer relations across contexts: Individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. Child Development, 74(5), 1328–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGloin, J. M., & Thomas, K. J. (2019). Peer influence and delinquency. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. (2023). Moral education through the fostering of reasoning skills. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. Online first, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10367-3

  • Moilanen, K. L., Shaw, D. S., Criss, M. M., & Dishion, T. J. (2009). Growth and predictors of parental knowledge of youth behavior during early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(6), 800–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén and Muthén.

  • Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R. (2001). Youths and deterrence: Columbia, South Carolina, 1979–1981 [Computer file]. 2nd ICPSR version. College Park, MD: University of Maryland [producer], 1985. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].

  • Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Van Hoof, A. (2005). Delinquency and moral reasoning in adolescence and young adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(3), 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romeral, L. F., Fernández, J. S., & Fraguela, J. A. G. (2018). Moral reasoning in adolescent offenders: A meta-analytic review. Psicothema, 30(3), 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddig, D. (2014). Peer group association, the acceptance of norms and violent behaviour: A longitudinal analysis of reciprocal effects. European Journal of Criminology, 11(3), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsema, J. J., & Lindenberg, S. M. (2018). Peer influence in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior: Advances from dynamic social network studies. Developmental Review, 50, 140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25(4), 863–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford University Press.

  • Walters, G. D. (2019). Peer influence or projection bias? Predicting respondent delinquency with perceptual measures of peer delinquency in 22 samples. Journal of Adolescence, 70, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2022a). Conscience and delinquency: A developmentally informed meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 65, 101026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2022b). Merging the peer selection and peer influence effects: Can neutralization beliefs and cognitive impulsivity serve as links in the chain? Criminology and Criminal Justice. Online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221105150

  • Walters, G. D. (2023). Does a change in moral neutralization from early to mid-adolescence predict a change in delinquency? Journal of Moral Education. Online first, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2176836

  • Wilkins, A. S. (2018). To lag or not to lag? Re-evaluating the use of lagged dependent variables in regression analysis. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(2), 393–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. T. N., & Weerman, F. M. (2013). Delinquency as a consequence of misperception: Overestimation of friends’ delinquent behavior and mechanisms of social influence. Social Problems, 60, 334–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminal Justice, Kutztown University, Kutztown, PA, 19530-0730, USA

    Glenn D. Walters

Authors
  1. Glenn D. Walters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn D. Walters.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No conflicts of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walters, G.D. The Role of Development in the Dynamic Relationship between Moral Agency and Peer Delinquency. J Dev Life Course Criminology 9, 483–506 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-023-00231-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-023-00231-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation