Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pseudo static experimental study on spider-supported glass curtain walls

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Glass Structures & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glass curtain walls (GCWs) are among the most commonly used building envelope components in modern buildings, and they can be divided into point-supported or frame-supported GCWs. Much of the current literature on the seismic performance of GCWs has focused on frame-supported GCWs, resulting in a dearth of data about point-supported GCWs. In this work, a pseudo-static experimental study was performed on spider-supported GCWs, a common type of point-supported GCW, with three different types of glass, namely monolithic, laminated, and insulating glass. The damage characteristics and seismic performance of each type of glass and the spiders were studied. For the tested 1.2 m by 1.2 m panels, the ultimate approximate inter-story drift ratios for monolithic, laminated and insulated glass panels were: 1/23, 1/28, and 1/24 rad, respectively. The integrality of the glass panels was believed to be the main reason for different behaviors of the tested specimens. Both monolithic and insulating glass specimens cracked abruptly and ejected numerous fragments onto the ground. The fragments of laminated glass panels would stay attached to the polymer film even after failure, preventing the ejection of fragments. The spiders were found severely deformed when the glass panels failed. More works are necessary to further systematically test and analyze their mechanical performance with more specimens under different height-to-width ratios, interlayer materials, glass thickness, and environmental temperatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello, C., Caterino, N., Maddaloni, G., Bonati, A., Franco, A., Occhiuzzi, A.: Experimental and numerical investigation of cyclic response of a glass curtain wall for seismic performance assessment. Constr. Build. Mater. 187, 596–609 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE/SEI 7–16: Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE, Reston, Virginia (2017)

  • Baird, A., Palermo, A., Pampanin, S.: Facade damage assessment of multi-storey buildings in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Bull. n. z. Soc. Earthq. Eng. 44(4), 368–376 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.368-376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behr, R.A.: Seismic performance of architectural glass in mid-rise curtain wall. J. Archit. Eng. 4(3), 94–98 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:3(94)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behr, R.A.: Architectural Glass to Resist Seismic and Extreme Climatic Events. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge (2009) ISBN: 978-1-84569-369-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Behr, R.A., Belarbi, A., Culp, J.H.: Dynamic racking tests of curtain wall glass elements with in-plane and out-of-plane motions. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 24(1), 1–14 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ber, B., Sustersic, I., Dujic, B., Jancar, J., Premrov, M.: Seismic shaking table testing of glass-timber buildings. World Conference on Timber Engineering, Quebec City, Canada (2014)

  • Charleson, A.: Architectural Design for Earthquake (2nd Edition). New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington (2007)

  • Evans, D., Kennett, E., Holmes, W.T., Ramirez, F.J.L.: Glass damage in the September 19, 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Report prepared for NSF, CES-861093 (1988).

  • FEMA E-74.: Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage—A Practical Guide. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. (2011).

  • FEMA P-58–2.: Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings: Volume 2—Implementation guide. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. (2012)

  • GB 50011–2010: Code for seismic design of buildings. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (2010) (in Chinese)

  • Gorenc, B., Beg, D.: Curtain wall façade system under lateral actions with regard to limit states. Steel Constr. 9(1), 37–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201400001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X.L., Wang, X.L., Yin, X.J., Lin, F., Hou, J.: Collapse simulation of reinforced concrete moment frames considering impact actions among blocks. Eng. Struct. 65, 30–41 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huveners, E.M.P.: Circumferentially adhesive bonded glass panes for bracing steel frames in facades. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2009). https://doi.org/10.6100/IR657800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W., Huang, B., Mosalam, K.M., Chen, S.: Experimental evaluation of a glass curtain wall of a tall building. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45(7), 1185–1205 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., Lu, X.Z., Guan, H., Ye, L.P.: Collapse simulation of reinforced concrete high-rise building induced by extreme earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42(5), 705–723 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X.Z., Tian, Y., Cen, S., Guan, H., Xie, L.L., Wang, L.S.: A high-performance quadrilateral flat shell element for seismic collapse simulation of tall buildings and its implementation in OpenSees. J. Earthqu. Eng. 22(9), 1662–1682 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1297269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X.Z., Yang, Z.B., Cimellaro, G.P., Xu, Z.: Pedestrian evacuation simulation under the scenario of earthquake-induced falling debris. Saf. Sci. 114, 61–71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memari, A.M., Shirazi, A.: Development of a seismic rating system for architectural glass in existing curtain walls, storefronts and windows. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada (2004)

  • NZS 1170–5 (S1): Structural design actions—Part 5: Earthquake actions—New Zealand, Commentary. Wellington, New Zealand (2004)

  • Pantelides, C.P., Behr, R.A.: Dynamic in-plane racking tests of curtain wall glass elements. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23(2), 211–228 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saatcioglu, M., Tremblay, R., Mitchell, D., Ghobarah, A., Palermo, D., Simpson, R., Adebar, P., Ventura, C., Hong, H.: Performance of steel buildings and nonstructural elements during the 27 February 2010 Maule (Chile) Earthquake. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 40, 722–734 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2012-0244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TBI. Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings (Version 2.03). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley (2017)

  • T/CECS 392–2021: Standard for anti-collapse design of building structures. Beijing: China Planning Press (2021) (in Chinese)

  • Van Lancker, B., De Corte, W., Belis, J.: Mechanical properties of continuous adhesive glass-steel connections under monotonic and cyclic loading. Glass Struct Eng 3, 197–211 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-018-0072-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X.: Curtain Wall Engineering Handbook. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (2002) (in Chinese) ISBN: 7-112-05319-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Z., Tian, Y., Yang, Z.B., Lu, X.Z.: Hybrid framework for simulating building collapse and ruin scenarios using finite element method and physics engine. Appl. Sci. Basel 10(12), 4408 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124408

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial supports of the National Key R&D Program (No. 2019YFC1509305), and the Tencent Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Safety and Durability of China Education Ministry, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, People’s Republic of China

    Yuan Tian, Zhebiao Yang, Wang Chen & Xinzheng Lu

  2. Research Institute of Urbanization and Urban Safety, School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China

    Yuan Tian

Authors
  1. Yuan Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhebiao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xinzheng Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinzheng Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program (No. 2019YFC1509305), and the Tencent Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Y., Yang, Z., Chen, W. et al. Pseudo static experimental study on spider-supported glass curtain walls. Glass Struct Eng 7, 681–691 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00170-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00170-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation