Skip to main content
Log in

Regenerating curriculum inquiry in Australia: some thoughts on this agenda

  • Point and counterpoint
  • Published:
Curriculum Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (2018). Engaging curriculum: Bridging the curriculum theory and English education divide. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klohr, P. R. (1980). The curriculum field: Gritty and ragged? Curriculum Perspectives, 1(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (1987). Curriculum Theory and Non-Sexist Education. Unpublished PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.

  • Yates, L. (2016). Europe, transnational curriculum movements and comparative curriculum theorizing. European Education Research Journal, 15(3), 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (2018). ‘Making’ and ‘taking’ problems: The curriculum field and Michael Young. In D. Guile, D. Lambert, & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Sociology, curriculum studies and professional knowledge (pp. 169–181). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyn Yates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yates, L. Regenerating curriculum inquiry in Australia: some thoughts on this agenda. Curric Perspect 38, 85–87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0039-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0039-1

Keywords

Navigation