Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship between substrate, physico-chemical parameters and foraminiferal tests in the Doñana National Park, a Biosphere Reserve in SW Spain

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Iberian Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multidisciplinar analysis of sediments collected in different environments of the Doñana National Park (Guadalquivir estuary, SW Spain) provides an overview of the textural, mineralogical and physico-chemical parameters that control the distribution of benthic foraminiferal tests in this Biosphere Reserve. These microorganisms are absent in the fine quartzitic sands that constitute the substrate of temporary ponds with brief hydroperiods located in the dune systems and spits, as well as in other ponds with low conductivities or hypersaline conditions located in the inner marshlands or near the Guadalquivir river banks. Dead benthic foraminifera are mainly found on phyllosilicate-rich, silty-clayey substrates. The taphonomic analysis of the main species (Ammonia tepida, Haynesina germanica, Trochammina inflata, Entzia macrescens) points to its deposit in situ. Cluster analysis permits to delimitate six foraminiferal assemblages. Cluster II (A. tepida + H. germanica) is the dominant assemblage in the central ponds and the margins of the main channels, while cluster IV (T. inflata + E. macrescens) is restricted to some ponds located on the high marsh and cluster VI (Ammonia beccarii + Quinqueloculina spp.) is abundant on external beaches. Tidal fluxes cause the transport of these last marine benthic species and some plaktonic forms both to the inner areas of the estuary and to these beaches.

Resumen

El análisis multidisciplinar de sedimentos obtenidos en diferentes medios del Parque Nacional de Doñana (estuario del río Guadalquivir, S. O. de España) proporciona una visión general de los parámetros texturales, mineralógicos y físico-químicos que controlan la distribución de los foraminíferos bentónicos muertos en esta Reserva de la Biosfera. Estos microorganismos están ausentes en las arenas finas cuarcíticas que constituyen el sustrato de lagunas temporales con breves hidroperiodos situadas en los sistemas de dunas y flechas litorales, así como en otras lagunas con bajas conductividades o condiciones hipersalinas localizadas en las marismas internas o cerca de las riberas del río Guadalquivir. Los caparazones de los foraminíferos se han encontrado principalmente en sustratos limo-arcillosos, ricos en filosilicatos. El análisis tafonómico de las principales (Ammonia tepida, Haynesina germanica, Trochammina inflata, Entzia macrescens) apunta a su depósito in situ. El análisis clúster permite diferenciar seis asociaciones. El clúster II (Ammonia inflata + Haynesina germanica) es la asociación dominante en las lagunas centrales del Parque y los márgenes de los canales principales, en tanto que el clúster IV (Trochammina inflata + Entzia macrescens) se restringe a algunas lagunas situadas sobre las marismas más elevadas y el clúster VI (Ammonia beccarii + Quinqueloculina spp.) es abundante en las playas externas. Los flujos mareales provocan el transporte de estas últimas especies marinas y de algunas formas planctónicas tanto hacia las zonas internas del estuario como a estas playas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alday, M., Cearreta, A., Freitas, M. C., & Andrade, C. (2013). Modern and late Holocene foraminiferal record of restrictd environmental conditions in the Albufeira Lagoon, SW Portugal. Geol Acta,11(1), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves, M. V., Yamashita, C., Mello, S. H., Machado, E. A., Disaró, S. T., Debenay, J.-P. & Duleba, W. (2019). Response of benthic foraminifera to environmental variability: importance of benthic foraminifera in monitoring studies. In: IntechOpen (Ed.), Monitoring of Marine Pollution (pp. 1–26), IntechOpen. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81658.

  • Ballesteros, A., & Bernasconi, E. (2019). Study of marsh foraminifera from the coastal plain of Buenos Aires (Argentina) and its ecological implications. Zootaxa,4560(3), 522–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, S., Álvarez, I., Cejudo, C., Recio, J. M., Borja, C., Bécares, E., et al. (2013). The diatom flora in temporary ponds of Doñana National Park (southwest Spain): Five new taxa. Nordic Journal of Botany,31, 489–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blázquez, A. M., Rodríguez, A., & Sanjuán, D. (2018). Palaeoenvironmental evolution from the early Holocene to the present of the Almenara marsh (western Mediterranean). Scientia Marina,82(4), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blázquez, A. M., & Usera, J. (2010). Palaeoenvironments and Quaternary foraminifera in the Elx coastal lagoon (Alicante, Spain). Quaternary International,221, 68–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrego, J., Morales, J. A., & Pendón, J. G. (1993). Elementos morfodinámicos responsables de la evolución reciente del estuario bajo del río Guadiana (Huelva). Geogaceta,11, 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchet, V. M. P., Goberville, E., & Frontalini, F. (2018). Benthic foraminifera to assess Ecological Quality Statuses in Italian transitional waters. Ecological Indicators,84, 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, G. S. & Robertson, D. (1870). XXVI.—The Ostracoda and Foraminifera of tidal rivers. With an analysis and descriptions of the Foraminifera, by Henry B. Brady, F.L.S. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 6(34), 273-309.

  • Calvo, L., & Pratolongo, P. (2009). Foraminíferos de marismas y llanuras de marea del estuario de Bahía Blanca, Argentina: Distribución e implicaciones ambientales. Revista Española de Micropaleontología,41(3), 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho, S., Moura, D., Connor, S., Scott, D., & Boski, T. (2015). Ecological zonation of benthic foraminifera in the lower Guadiana Estuary (southeastern Portugal). Marine Micropaleontology,114, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, J. & Urdiales, C. (1995). Introducción a la Gestión Hidráulica de las Marismas del Parque Nacional de Doñana. In: Montes, C. (Ed.), Bases ecológicas para la restauración de humedales en la cuenca Mediterránea (pp. 165–189). Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía. Sevilla.

  • Cearreta, A., Alday, M., Irabien, M. J., Etxebarria, N., & Soto, J. (2008). Modern conditions and recent environmental development of the Muskiz estuary: Historical disturbance by the largest oil refinery of Spain. Journal of Iberian Geology,34(2), 191–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuena, G. J. (1991). Proyecto de regeneración de las playas de Isla Cristina. Spain: Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Turismo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, J. A. (1915). A monograph of the foraminifera of the North Pacific Ocean. pt. 5. Rotaliidae. Bulletin of the U. S. Natural Museum,71, 1–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, J. A. (1926). Recent Foraminifera from Puerto Rico. The Carnegie Institution of Washington Publications,344, 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, J. A. (1933). Some new Recent Foraminifera from the tropical Pacific. Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research,9, 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, J. A. (1944). Foraminifera from the Shallow Water of the New England Coast. Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication,12, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, J. A., & Moyer, D. A. (1930). Some Recent Foraminifera from off San Pedro. Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research,6(3), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Orbigny, A. D. (1826). Tableau méthodique de la classe des Céphalopodes. Annales des Sciences Naturelles,7(96–169), 245–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Orbigny, A. D. (1839). Foraminiferes. In: Barker-Webb, P. & Berthelot, S., Histoire Naturelle des Iles Canaries (pp. 119–146). Bethane, Paris.

  • d’Orbigny, A. D. (1846). Die fossilen Foraminiferen des tertiären Beckens von Wien. Foraminifères fossiles du bassin tertiaire de Vienne.

  • Debenay, J.P., Guillou, J.J., Redois, F. & Geslin, E. (2000). Distribution trends of foraminiferal assemblages in paralic environments: a base for using foraminifera as bioindicators. In: Martin, R.E. (Ed.), Environmental Micropaleontology. Topics in Geobiology 15 (pp. 39-67). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, NewYork.

  • Díaz, C., Fernández, R., Florencio, M., García, P., Gómez, C., Portheault, A., et al. (2010). Temporary ponds from Doñana National Park: A system of antural habitats for the preservation of aquatic flora and fauna. Limnetica,29(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diz, P., Francés, G., & Vilas, F. (2000). Microhábitats de foraminíferos bentónicos en la ría de Vigo y su aplicación a la interpretación paleoecológica. Journal of Iberian Geology,26, 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, C. G. (1840). Eine weitere Erläuterung des Organismus mehrerer in Berlin lebend beobachteter Polythalamien der Nordsee. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, pp 18–23.

  • Ellis, B. F. & Messina, A. (1940–2015). Catalogue of Foraminifera. Micropaleontology Press, American Museum of Natural History, New York.

  • Elshanawany, R., Ibrahim, M. I., Milker, Y., Schmiedl, G., Badr, N., Kholeif, S. E. A., et al. (2011). Anthropogenic impacto n benthic foraminifera, Abu-quir Bay, Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Foraminiferal Research,41(4), 326–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichtel, L. V., & Moll, J. P. C. V. (1798). Testacea microscopica, aliaque minuta ex generibus Argonauta et Nautilus, ad naturam picta et descripta (Microscopische und andere kleine Schalthiere aus den Geschlechtern Argonaute und Schiff er). Vienna: Camesina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, S., Marchant, M., Giglio, S., & Ramírez, M. (2006). Foraminíferos bentónicos del talud continental desde Concepción a las islas Guaitecas (36°–44° S), Chile (Foraminifera: Lagenina, Miliolina y Robertinina). Gayana,70(1), 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R. L., & Ward, W. C. (1957). A study in the significance of grain-size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,27, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, D., Moreno, E., & Green, A. J. (2006). Species richness and distribution of copepods and cladocerans and their relation to hydroperiod and other environmental variables in Doñana, south-west Spain. Hydrobiologia,556, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García Novo, F., Martín, A. & Toja, J. (2007). La frontera de Doñana. Universidad de Sevilla (Ed.), Colección Divulgación Científica, 10, 1-317.

  • Gómez Rodríguez, C. (2009). Condicionantes ecológicos de la distribución de anfibios en el Parque nacional de Doñana. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Salamanca, 301 pp.

  • González-Regalado, M. L., Carro, B., Arroyo, M., Ruiz, F., Borrego, J., Abad, M., et al. (2019). Distribution of benthic foraminifera in the marine estuary of the Guadalquivir River (SW Spain): A preliminary report. Oceanography & Fisheries,9(2), 555759. https://doi.org/10.19080/OFOAJ.2019.09.555759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Regalado, M. L., Ruiz, F., Baceta, J. I., González-Regalado, E., & Muñoz, J. M. (2001). Total benthic foraminifera assemblages in the southwestern Spanish estuaries. Geobios,34, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfensdorfer, A. M., Power, H. E., & Hubble, T. C. T. (2019). Modelling Holocene analogues of coastal plain estuaries reveals the magnitude of sea-level threat. Scienfic Reports,9, 2667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isla, F. I. (2009). Coastal lagoons. In F. Isla & O. Iribarne (Eds.), Coastal zones and estuaries (pp. 320–338). Oxford: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A. (1966). Contribution a l’ étude ecologique et micropaléontologique de quelques Elphidium (foraminiferes) du Roussillon. Description d’une nouvelle espece: Elphidium cuvilleri n. sp. Vie et milieu,17, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata [10th revised edition]. Laurentius Salvius, Holmiae.

  • Lintner, M., Wukovits, J. & Heinz, P. (2019). Carbon and nitrogen uptake of two intertidal forraminifera (Ammonia tepida and Haynesina germanica) depending on salinity. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 21, EGU2019-6892.

  • Loeblich, A. R., & Tappan, H. (1987). Foraminiferal genera and their classification. Kansas: Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research Contributions, Special Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddy, D. & Brew, J.S. (1995). Statistical modelling of Quaternary science data. Technical Guide 5. Quaternary Research Association, Cambridge.

  • Mamo, B., Strots, L., & Dominey-Howes, Dale. (2009). Tsunami sediments and their foraminiferal assemblages. Earth-Science Reviews,96(4), 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, V., Yamashita, C., Sousa, S. H. M., Martins, P., Laut, L. L. M., Figueira, R. C. L., et al. (2011). The response of benthic foraminifera to pollution and environmental stress in Ria de Aveiro (N Portugal). Journal of Iberian Geology,37(2), 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateu, G., Box, A., Deudero, S., & Rodríguez, B. (2010). Comparative analysis of epiphytic foraminifera in sediments colonized by seagrass Posidonia oceánica and invasive macroalgae Caulerpa spp. Journal of Foraminiferal Research,40(2), 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, I., González, R., Dias, J. M. A., Lobo, F., & Martins, V. (2004). Factors influencing recent benthic foraminifera distribution on the Guadiana shelf (Southwestern Iberia). Marine Micropaleontology,51, 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milker, Y., & Schmiedl, G. (2012). A taxonomic guide to modern benthic shelf foraminifera of the western Mediterranean Sea. Palaeontologia Electronica,15(2), 16a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A. E. (2006). Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ordiales, A., Martínez, B., & Mendioca, J. (2017). Distribución y ecología de las asociaciones de foraminíferos bentónicos recientes del estuario de Oriñón (E de Cantabria, N de la península Ibérica). Geogaceta,61, 131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, A., Elorza, M., Martín, M., & Rodríguez Lázaro, J. (2006). Situación medioamiental de la marisma Joyel (Cantabria): Datos aportados por los foraminíferos bentónicos. Geogaceta,40, 183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual, A., Martín, M., & Rodríguez Lázaro, J. (2004). Repartición de los foraminíferos bentónicos recientes en la marisma Victoria (Noja, Cantabria). Geogaceta,36, 151–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phleger, F. B., & Parker, F. L. (1952). Ecology of foraminifera, northwest Gulf of Mexico. Pt. II. Foraminifera species. Memoirs of the Geological Society of America,46, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozo, M., Ruiz, F., Carretero, M. I., Rodríguez Vidal, J., Cáceres, L. M., Abad, M., et al. (2010). Mineralogical assemblages, geochemistry and fossil associations of Pleistocene-Holocene complex siliciclastic deposits from the Southwestern Doñana National Park (SW Spain): A palaeoenvironmental approach. Sedimentary Geology,225, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reolid, M., & Martínez-Ruiz, F. (2012). Comparison of benthic foraminifera and geochemical proxies in shelf deposits from the Upper Jurasic of the Prebetic (southern Spain). Journal of Iberian Geology,38(2), 449–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuss, A. E. (1850). Neue Foraminiferen aus den Schichten des österreichischen Tertiärbeckens. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften,1, 365–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F., González-Regalado, M. L., Galán, E., González, M. I., Prudencio, M. I., Dias, M. I., et al. (2012). Benthic foraminifera as bioindicators of anthropogenic impacts in two North African lagoons: A comparison with ostracod assemblages. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas,29(3), 527–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F., Pozo, M., Carretero, M. I., Abad, M., González-Regalado, M. L., Muñoz, J. M., et al. (2010). Birth, evolution and death of a lagoon: Late pleistocene to Holocene palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the Doñana National Park (SW Spain). In A. G. Friedman (Ed.), Lagoons: Biology, management and environmental impact (pp. 371–396). New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad, S. A. & Wade, C. M. (2017). Seasonal and spatial variation of saltmarsh benthic foraminiferal communities from North Norfolk, England. Microbial Ecology, 73 (3), 539-555.151-154.

  • Sánchez, R. (2009). Caudales ecológicos en la marisma del Parque Nacional de Doñana y su área de influencia. WWF España, Madrid, Spain: Synthesis report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönfeld, J., Alve, E., Geslin, E., Jorissen, F., Korsun, S., & Spezzaferri, S. (2012). The FOBIMO (FOraminiferal BIo-MOnitoring) initiative—Towards a standardised protocol for soft-bottom benthic foraminiferal monitoring studies. Marine Micropaleontology,94–95, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Thompson, L., Hitchin, R., & Scourse, J. (1998). Observations on selected salt-marsh and shallow-marine species of agglutinating foraminifera: Grain size and mineralogical selectivity. Journal of Foraminiferal Research,28(4), 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semensatto, D. L., Ferreira, R., Dias, D., & Coelho, C. (2009). Foraminiferal ecological zonation along a Brazilian mangrove transect: Diversity, morphotypes and the influence of subaerial exposure time. Révue de Micropaléontologie,52, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, L., Reina, M., Martín, G., Reyes, A., Arechederra, A., León, D., et al. (2006). The aquatic systems of Doñana (SW Spain): Watersheds and frontiers. Limnetica,25(1–2), 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. A., Kirby, J. R., Holgate, S., Tutman, P., & Plater, A. J. (2016). Contemporary salt-marsh foraminiferal distribution from the Adriatic coast of Croatia and its potentical for sea-level studies. Journal of Foraminiferal Research,46(3), 314–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siljestrom, P. (1985). Geomorfología y edafogénesis de las arenas del Parque Nacional de Doñana. Ph. D. Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla.

  • Siljestrom, P., & Clemente, L. (1990). Geomorphology and Soil Evolution of a Moving Dune System in SW Spain (Doñana National Park). Journal of Arid Environments,18, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, S. C., Canales, M. L., Sandoval, J., & Henriques, M. H. (2017). Paleoeoclogical quantitative analysis based on benthic foraminifera of the Aalenian-Bajocian boundary (upper Bradfordensis-lower Discites) in the Barranco de Agua Larga section (Betic Cordillera, Southern Spain). Journal of Iberian Geology,43, 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasulu, G., Praseetha, B. S., Daud, N. R., Varghese, T. I., Prakash, T. N., & Jayaraju, N. (2019). Benthic foraminifera as potential ecological proxies for environmental monitoring in coastal regions: A study on the Beypore estuary, Southwest coast of India. Marine Pollution Bulletin,138, 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strotz, L. (2003). Holocene foraminifera from Tuross Estuary and Coila Lake, south coast, New South Wales: A preliminary study. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales,124, 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva, P., & Canudo, J. I. (2008). Assemblages of recent benthic foraminifera from the northeastern gulf of Cádiz. Geogaceta,44, 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva, P., Canudo, J. I., & Cervera, J. L. (1999). Los foraminíferos bentónicos recientes de la superfamilia Miliolacea Ehrenberg, 1839 en los sedimentos superficiales del margen septentrional del Golfo de Cádiz. Revista Española de Micropaleontología,31(1), 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, H. (1923). Die Miliolideen der östlichen Adria. Praga: Bubenec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, W. C. (1858). On the Recent Foraminifera of Great Britain. London: Royal Society.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Liu, C., Fürsich, F. T., Yang, T., & Yin, J. (2015). Foraminifera as environmental indicators and quatitative salinity reconstructions in the Pearl River estuary, southern China. Journal of Foraminiferal Research,45(3), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias, I., Dimitrou, E., Dekker, A., & Dorsman, E. (2007). Overview of temporary ponds in the Mediterranean region: Threats, managements and conservation issues. Journal of Environmental Biology,28, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out through the following projects: (a) DGYCIT project CTM2006-06722/MAR; (b) DGYCIT project CGL2006-01412; (c) ´Roman cities of the Baetica. CORPVS VRBIVM BAETICARVM (I) (CUB)´ (Regional Government of Andalusia); (d) ´From the Atlantic to the Tyrrhenian; and (e) CIMA Research Center Project UID/MAR/00350/2013 funded by the Portuguese Science Fundation (FCT). The hispanic ports and their commercial relations with Ostia Antica. DEATLANTIR II - HAR2017-89154-P - (Plan Nacional de I + D + i). Other funds have come from Andalusian Government (groups HUM-132, RNM-238, RNM-293 and RNM-349). It is a contribution to the Research Center in Historical, Cultural and Natural Heritage (CIPHCN) of the University of Huelva. We also appreciate the valuable comments and constructive suggestions of Professor Ana Bernabéu, Professor Hugo A. Corbi and an anonymous reviewer, which greatly helped us to improve our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente (FCMA), Centro de Investigaçao Marinha e Ambiental (CIMA), Campus de Gambelas, Universidad do Algarve, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal

    Liliana Guerra & Cristina Veiga-Pires

  2. Departmento de Ciencias de la Tierra, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad de Huelva, Avda. 3 de marzo, s/n, 21071, Huelva, Spain

    María Luz González-Regalado, Antonio Toscano, Francisco Ruiz, Joaquín Rodríguez Vidal, Luis Miguel Cáceres, Josep Tosquella, Paula Gómez & Verónica Romero

  3. Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de la Universidad de Atacama (IDICTEC-UDA), Avenida Copayapu 485, Copiapó, Chile

    Manuel Abad & Tatiana Izquierdo

  4. Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, 28933, Móstoles, Spain

    Manuel Abad

  5. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012, Seville, Spain

    Juan Manuel Muñoz

  6. Departmento de Cristalografía, Mineralogía y Química Agrícola, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012, Seville, Spain

    María Isabel Carretero & Guadalupe Monge

  7. Departamento de Geología y Geoquímica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain

    Manuel Pozo

  8. Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares (C2TN), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 2695-066, LRS, Bobadela, Portugal

    Francisco Ruiz, María Isabel Prudencio, María Isabel Dias & Rosa Marques

  9. Centro de Investigación en Patrimonio Histórico, Cultural y Natural (CIPHCN), Universidad de Huelva, 21071, Huelva, Spain

    María Luz González-Regalado, Antonio Toscano, Joaquín Rodríguez Vidal, Luis Miguel Cáceres, Josep Tosquella, Paula Gómez & Verónica Romero

Authors
  1. Liliana Guerra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristina Veiga-Pires
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María Luz González-Regalado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manuel Abad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Antonio Toscano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Juan Manuel Muñoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Francisco Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Joaquín Rodríguez Vidal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Luis Miguel Cáceres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tatiana Izquierdo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. María Isabel Carretero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Manuel Pozo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Guadalupe Monge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Josep Tosquella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. María Isabel Prudencio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. María Isabel Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Rosa Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Paula Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Verónica Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Ruiz.

Systematic appendix

Systematic appendix

Ammonia beccarii (Linnaeus, 1758)

Figure 7, 13–14.

1758 Nautilus beccarii Linnaeus, p. 710, pl. 1, fig. 1 (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Ammonia tepida (Cushman, 1926)

Figure 7, 15–16

1926 Rotalia beccarii var. tepida Cushman, p. 79, pl. 1 (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Astigerinata mamilla (Williamson, 1858)

Figure 7, 17–18

1858 Rotalina mamilla Williamson, p. 54, pl. 4, figs. 109–111.

Bolivina ordinaria Phleger & Parker, 1952

Figure 8, 1

1952 Bolivina ordinaria Phleger & Parker, pl. 3, figs. 1–3.

Bulimina elongata d’Orbigny, 1826

Figure 8, 2

1826 Bulimina elongata d’Orbigny, p. 187, pl. 111, figs. 19–20 (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Buliminella elegantissima (d’Orbigny, 1839)

Figure 8, 3

1839 Bulimina elegantissima d’Orbigny, p. 51, pl. 7, figs. 13–14.

Cassidulina laevigata d’Orbigny, 1826

Figure 8, 4

1826 Cassidulina laevigata d’Orbigny, p. 282, pl. 15, figs. 4–5 (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Cornuspira involvens (Reuss, 1850)

Figure 7, 9.

1850 Operculina involvens Reuss, p. 370, pl. 46, fig. 30.

Elphidium complanatum (d’Orbigny, 1839)

1839 Polystomella complanata d’Orbigny, p. 129, pl. 2, figs. 35–36 (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Elphidium crispum (Linnaeus, 1758)

Figure 8, 5

1758 Nautilus crispus Linnaeus, p. 709, pl. 19, figs. a–d (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Elphidium cuvillieri Levy, 1966

Figure 8, 6

1966 Elphidium cuvillieri Levy, p. 5, pl. 1, fig. 6.

Entzia macrescens (Brady, 1870)

Figure 7, 4.

1870 Trochammina inflata var. macrescens Brady, p. 290.

Globocassidulina minuta (Cushman, 1933)

Figure 8, 7

1933 Paracassidulina minuta Cushman, p. 92, pl. 10, fig. 3.

Haynesina germanica (Ehrenberg, 1840)

Figure 8, 8

1840 Nonionina germanica Ehrenberg, p. 23, pl. 2, fig. 1 (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Hopkinsina atlántica Cushman, 1944

Figure 8, 9

1944 Hopkinsina pacifica var. atlantica Cushman, p. 30, pl. 4, fig. 1.

Miliammina fusca (Brady & Robertson, 1870)

1870 Quinqueloculina fusca Brady & Robertson, p. 286, pl. 11, fig. 2.

Nonion fabum (Fichtel & Moll, 1798)

Figure 8, 10

1798 Nautilis faba Fichtel & Moll, p. 103, pl. 19, figs. a–c.

Nonionella stella Cushman & Moyer, 1930

Figure 8, 11–12

1930 Nonionella miocenica var. stella Cushman & Moyer, p. 56, pl. 17, figs. 17 a–c.

Porosononion granosum (d’Orbigny, 1846)

Figure 8, 13

1846 Nonionina granosa d’Orbigny, p. 110, pl. 5, figs. 19–20 (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Planorbulina mediterranensis d’Orbigny, 1826

Figure 8, 14–15

1826 Planorbulina mediterranensis d’Orbigny, p. 280, pl. 14, figs. 4–6 (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Quinqueloculina fusca Brady, 1870

1870 Quinqueloculina fusca Brady, p. 286, pl. 11, figs. 2–3.

Quinqueloculina laevigata d’Orbigny, 1826

Figure 7, 10

1839 Quinqueloculina laevigata d’Orbigny, p. 134, pl. 4, Fig. 1.

Quinqueloculina seminula (Linnaeus, 1758)

Figure 7

1758 Serpula seminulum Linnaeus, p. 786.

Quinqueloculina schlumbergeri (Wiesner, 1923)

Figure 7, 12

1923 Miliolina schlumbergeri Wiesner, p. 49, pl. 6, fig. 73.

Rosalina bradyi (Cushman, 1915)

Figure 8, 16–17

1915 Discorbis globularis var. bradyi Cushman, p. 12, pl. 8, fig. 1 (in Ellis & Messina, 1940).

Trochammina inflata (Montagu, 1808)

Figure 7, 3.

1808 Trochammina inflata Montagu, p. 81, pl. 18, fig. 3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerra, L., Veiga-Pires, C., González-Regalado, M.L. et al. Relationship between substrate, physico-chemical parameters and foraminiferal tests in the Doñana National Park, a Biosphere Reserve in SW Spain. J Iber Geol 46, 21–38 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41513-019-00116-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41513-019-00116-w

Keywords

Palabras clave

Search

Navigation