Skip to main content
Log in

Out of the Comfort Zone: Quantifying Country Risk for Foreign Mining Project Investment Feasibilities

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As high-quality mineral deposits are thoroughly exploited, mines of the future will have to move towards more remote and lower quality projects. With these projects comes an increased business risk to the operator. Even now, mining companies often turn to foreign countries for new deposits to produce, introducing the concept of country risk into their portfolio. Furthermore, feasibility studies often fail to accurately quantify the risks associated with various projects, and as such, this study proposes a technique of risk quantification which can both aid mining companies to evaluate the viability of investment and assist in risk disclosure to public investors for the mining industry of the future. This paper aims to quantify the effects of country risk on the valuation of potential mining projects, using a combination of modular and risk-weighting techniques to evaluate the country risk premium (CRP) required to obtain capital for operation of risky foreign mining projects. The techniques proposed in this paper are demonstrated using fictional examples and then evaluated for accuracy against a recently developed debt-funded precious metal project in a country in the Americas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bora P, Vanek M, Špakovská K (2015) Risk premium and cost of capital: application in mining industry. Ostrava.

  2. Boudreaux D (2011) A new and better way to measure the cost of equity capital for small closely held firms. Journal of Business & Economics Research.

  3. Caesars Report (2018) Should mining companies use higher discount rates? Retrieved from Caesars Report - Junior Mining & Resource Investing: https://www.caesarsreport.com/blog/saturday-read-should-mining-companies-use-higher-discount-rates/

  4. Cheung C, Morin S (2007) The impact of emerging Asia on commodity prices. Bank of Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christmann P (2018) Towards a more equitable use of mineral resources. Nat Resour Res 27(2):159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark E (1997) Valuing political risk. Journal Of International Money And Finance.

  7. Damodaran A (2005). Measuring company exposure to country risk: theory and practice. Retrieved from Stern NYU: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/valquestions/CountryRisk.htm

  8. Damodaran A (2019) Country default spreads and risk premiums. New York: New York University - Stern School of Business. Retrieved from NYU Stern: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/ctryprem.html

  9. Damodaran A (2019) Country risk: determinants, measures and implications – the, 2019th edn. New York University - Stern School of Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Bruyn C (2010) DRC withdraws permit for First Quantum’s Frontier mine. Retrieved from Mining Weekly: http://www.miningweekly.com/article/first-quantum-suspends-operations-at-drc-mine-permit-revoked-2010-08-30/rep_id:3650

  11. Faúndez PI, Marquardt C, Jara JJ, Guzmán JI (2020) Valuation and prioritization of early-stage exploration projects: a case study of Cu–Ag and Au-mineralized systems in the Tiltil Mining District. Chile Natural Resources Research 29:2989–3014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09637-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gentry DW, O’Neil TJ (1984) Mine investment analysis. AIME Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. IndexMundi. (2010). Imports of copper and articles thereof in USD (2010). Retrieved from IndexMundi: https://www.indexmundi.com/trade/imports/?chapter=74

  14. Jafarizpoadeh B, Bratvold R (2019) Exploration economics: taking opportunities and the risk of double-counting risk. Mineral Economics, 323–335.

  15. Kamenopoulos SN, Agioutantis Z (2020) Geopolitical risk assessment of countries with rare earth element deposits. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 37(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kislingerová E (2007) Manažerské Finance. Prague: C. H. Beck.

  17. Koo C, Howard-Jones D, Ngai Kin N, Cher YL (2011) Managing country risks: perspectives for the post-crisis landscape. Oliver Wyman, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  18. KPMG International (2013) Zambia - country mining guide. Zurich: KPMG International.

  19. Mařík M (2002) Diskontní míra pro výnosové oceňování podniků v podmínkách České republiky. Odhadce a oceňování majetku.

  20. Mills R (2011) The mining sector’s two biggest risks: country risk and resource nationalism. Retrieved from Mining.com: https://www.mining.com/the-mining-sectors-two-biggest-risks-country-risk-and-resource-nationalism/

  21. Mitchell P (2019 September 24). Top 10 business risks and opportunities – 2020. Retrieved from Ernst & Young: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/mining-metals/10-business-risks-facing-mining-and-metals?fbclid=IwAR29ElFzu0ZaFPtl1pl2giMENyWx8Gip5wOtqWy0Ls9zSKYX9OPWCHYz7D0

  22. Radley B (2017) The DRC is revisiting its mining code. Why reform is long overdue. Retrieved from The Conversation: https://theconversation.com/the-drc-is-revisiting-its-mining-code-why-reform-is-long-overdue-79937

  23. Sabal J (2008) A practical approach for quantifying country risk. Globalization, Competitiveness, and Governability.

  24. Sauvageau M, Kumral M (2017) Kalman filtering-based approach for project valuation of an iron ore mining project through spot price and long-term commitment contracts. Nat Resour Res 26(3):303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sguazzin A, Hill M (2019) A copper mining lesson from Zambia: history repeats itself. Retrieved from Bloomberg Economics: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-23/a-copper-mining-lesson-from-zambia-history-repeats-itself

  26. Smith J E, Nau R F (1995) Valuing risky projects: option pricing theory and decision analysis. Management Science, 795–816.

  27. Suopajärvi L, Ejdemo T, Klyuchnikova E, Korchak E, Nygaard V, Peolzer G (2017) Social impacts of the “glocal” mining business: case studies from Northern Europe. Mineral Economics, 31–39.

  28. Trading Economics (2019) Chile GDP from mining. Retrieved from TradingEconomics: https://tradingeconomics.com/chile/gdp-from-mining

  29. Trading Economics (2019) Armenia. Retrieved from TradingEconomics: https://tradingeconomics.com/armenia/rating

  30. Trading Economics (2019) Country list. Retrieved from TradingEconomics: Tradingeconomics.com/country-list/rating

  31. Valach J (2006) Investiční rozhodování a dlouhodobé financování. Ekopress, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weijermars R (2015) Natural resource wealth optimization: a review of fiscal regimes and equitable agreements for petroleum and mineral extraction projects. Nat Resour Res 24(4):385–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for supporting this research (Fund number: 236482).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Kumral.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The primary author is currently employed by the De Beers Group of Companies. No information in this manuscript applies to or has been obtained through this relationship. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Renaud, M., Kumral, M. Out of the Comfort Zone: Quantifying Country Risk for Foreign Mining Project Investment Feasibilities. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 38, 2323–2335 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00495-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00495-8

Keywords

Navigation