Abstract
No aspect of Jagadis Chandra Bose’s science is more enigmatic than his concern with the relationship between the living and nonliving, explored from 1900 through 1902. Elsewhere this writer called this the ‘middle Bose’ period since it separated Bose the physicist (1894–1900) from Bose the plant physiologist (1903 and after). The essence of his insight developed in this brief period was formerly termed by this writer the ‘Boseian thesis’ and summarized as ‘There is no discontinuity between the living and nonliving’. However, a more nuanced examination of three key texts published by Bose in this period, along with supplemental archival documents reveals that his articulation of the relationship between the living and nonliving evolved in subtle and daring ways culminating in an expression of the doctrine of panvitalism. This doctrine—that life pervades all matter—is an idea about the natural world. Thus, examining Bose’s panvitalism takes us into the realm of intellectual history: the close study of the meaning of Bose’s texts in order to understand his intention in exploring the relationship of the living and nonliving, the context of his investigation and its relation to the texts, and how he arrived at his panvitalist doctrine. The intellectual history of Bose’s panvitalism is the subject of this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
12 March 2022
Unfortunately the wrong front has been used for the article title.
Notes
See Dasgupta (2016, pp. 5–7) for a brief discussion on the distinction between information and knowledge.
See Dasgupta (2009) for several references to this trait.
See Dasgupta (2009, pp. 131–135) for an extensive discussion of the status of vitalism in fin de siècle biological thought.
Whiggism is the tendency to judge a historical event or act according to criteria or values or conditions of a later time; in particular, to the historian’s own time (see Dasgupta 2021).
References
Bose, J. C. (1900a). De la géneralité des phénomènes moléculaires produits par l’electricité sur la matière inorganique vivante. International Congress of Physics, Paris. In P. Bhattacharya & M. Engineer (Eds.), Acharya J.C. Bose—A scientist and a dreamer (Vol. 1, pp. 227–249). Kolkata: Bose Institute (reprinted).
Bose, J. C. (1900b). On the similarity of electrical stimulus on inorganic and living substances. The Electrician, 45, 724–727, 864–865, 897–901.
Bose, J. C. (1901). The response of inorganic matter to mechanical and electrical stimulus: Friday Evening Discourse. London: The Royal Institution of Great Britain. In P. Bhattacharya & M. Engineer (Eds.), Acharya J.C. Bose—A scientist and a dreamer (Vol. 1, pp. 205–217). Kolkata: Bose Institute (reprinted).
Bose, J. C. (1902). Response in the living and nonliving. Longmans Green and Co.
Bose, J. C. (1903–1905). On the mechanical and electrical response in plants (File AP 76.1). Royal Society of London Archives (unpublished manuscript).
Bose, J. C. (1904, March 29). US Patent 755840.
Brett, A. (2002). What is intellectual history now? In D. Cannadine (Ed.), What is history now? (pp. 113–131). Palgrave Macmillan.
Collingwood, R. G. (1956). The idea of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Original work published 1946.
Collini, S. (2016). The identity of intellectual history. In R. Whatmore & B. Young (Eds.), A companion to intellectual history (pp. 7–18). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
Dasgupta, S. (1998). Jagadis Bose, Augustus waller and the discovery of ‘vegetable electricity’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 52(2), 307–322.
Dasgupta, S. (2009). Jagadis Chandra Bose and the Indian response to Western science. Permanent Black. original work published 1999.
Dasgupta, S. (2016). Computer science: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Dasgupta, S. (2019). A cognitive historical approach to creativity. Routledge.
Dasgupta, S. (2021). Whiggism, creativity and the historiography of technoscience. Indian Journal of History of Science, 56, 28–36.
Eliot, T. S. (1954). Selected poems. Faber & Faber.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. Basic Books.
Hanson, N. R. (1972). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolution (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
LaCapra, D. (1983). Rethinking intellectual history: Texts, contexts, language. Cornell University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of research programmes. Cambridge University Press.
Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. (1977). Scientific discovery. MIT Press.
Latour, B. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Harvard University Press.
Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. University of California Press.
Lovejoy, A. O. (1964). The great chain of being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. original work published 1936.
Medawar, P. B. (1990). The threat and the glory. Oxford University Press.
Medawar, P. B., & Medawar, J. S. (1983). Aristotle to zoos: A philosophical dictionary of biology. Harvard University Press.
Nisbet, R. (1994). History of the idea of progress. Transaction Publishers.
Popper, K. R. (1965). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Harper & Row.
Popper, K. R. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. Harper & Row.
Popper, K. R. (1994). The myth of the framework. Routledge.
Sen, D. (Ed.) (1994). Patrabali (letters from J.C. Bose to Rabindranath Tagore). Kolkata: Bose Institute.
Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3–53.
Waller, A. D. (1896). An introduction to human physiology. Longmans Green & Co.
Waller, A. D. (1897). A brief summary of the principal phenomena of animal electricity. The Royal Institution of Great Britain.
Waller, A. D. (1903). Eight lectures on the signs of life from their electrical aspects. John Murray.
Whatmore, R. (2016). What is intellectual history? Polity.
White, H. (1978). Tropics of discourse. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Acknowledgements
My thanks to an anonymous reviewer of an earlier version of this paper for his critical and constructive comments and suggestions. Thanks also to John Bosco Lourdusamy for comments pertaining to the earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dasgupta, S. Jagadis Bose’s panvitalism as intellectual history. Indian J Hist. Sci. 57, 26–36 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-022-00032-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-022-00032-6