Original articleEnamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives☆
References (26)
Residual acrylic adhesive after removal of plastic orthodontic brackets: A scanning electron microscope study
Am. J. Orthod.
(1977)- et al.
The effects of wear, acid etching, and bond removal on human enamel
Am. J. Orthod.
(1977) - et al.
Restoration of fractured and hypoplastic incisors by the acid-etch technique: A three-year report
J. Am. Dent. Assoc.
(1977) - et al.
Clinical evaluation of composite resins as anterior and posterior restorative materials
J. Prosthet. Dent.
(1975) - et al.
The effects of adhesive systems on tooth surfaces
Am. J. Orthod.
(1971) - et al.
Clinical experience with the acid-etch technique in orthodontics
Am. J. Orthod.
(1975) - et al.
Enamel pretreatment: A critical variable in direct bonding systems
Am. J. Orthod.
(1973) A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics
Am. J. Orthod.
(1977)Interaction of fluoride with human enamel
A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces
J. Dent. Res.
(1955)
Studies demonstrating the need for an intermediary resin of low viscosity for the acid etch technique
Microscopic evaluation of enamel after debonding clinical application
Am. J. Orthod.
The adaptation of composite and non-composite resins to acid etched enamel surfaces
Cited by (102)
Effect of different debonding techniques on shear bond strength and enamel cracks in simulated clinical set-ups
2020, Journal of the World Federation of OrthodontistsCitation Excerpt :One of the important aims in fixed orthodontic treatments is to preserve tooth enamel structure during and after orthodontic treatment and to cause the least enamel loss after debonding of orthodontic brackets [1–3].
Decalcification and bond failure rate in resin modified glass ionomer cement versus conventional composite for orthodontic bonding: A systematic review & meta-analysis
2020, International OrthodonticsCitation Excerpt :As there was no consensus in the rate of bracket failure between RMGIC and CC, RMGIC can be used in difficult situations where isolation is difficult to maintain such as partially erupted premolars. In bonding with CC, enamel loss occurs during etching as well as during the removal of excess material at the time of debonding which is not the case with RMGIC [30]. The dental materials should be biocompatible.
Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel
2017, International OrthodonticsEffect of 3 cements on white spot lesion formation after full-coverage rapid maxillary expander: A comparative in-vivo study
2016, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsCitation Excerpt :Hence, further studies exploring the effect of topical fluoride supplements such as mouth rinses, and gel and varnish applications that will recharge the cements during RME treatment are needed. The previous studies showed that acid etching during bonding and removal of the residual luting agents on the enamel during debonding lead to enamel loss.40,41 GIC and polycarboxylate cement have the advantage of adhering to enamel without acid etching, and GICs were shown to cause less enamel damage at debonding.42
Enamel alterations due to orthodontic treatment
2016, Orthodontic Applications of Biomaterials: A Clinical Guide
- ☆
This study was supported in part by an MRC General Support Grant.