Categorical and probabilistic reasoning in medical diagnosis☆
References (37)
- et al.
GUS, A Frame-Driven Dialog System
Artificial Intelligence
(1977) - et al.
Production Rules as a Representation for a Knowledge-Based Consultation Program
Artificial Intelligence
(1977) Foundations of fuzzy reasoning
Int. J. Man-Machine Studies
(1976)- et al.
Decision Analysis as the Basis for Computer-Aided Management of Acute Renal Failure
The American Journal of Medicine
(October 1973) - et al.
Capturing Clinical Expertise: A Computer Program that Considers Clinical Responses to Digitalis
American Journal of Medicine
(1978) - et al.
A Model of inexact reasoning in medicine
Mathematical Biosciences
(1975) Fuzzy sets
Information and Control
(1965)Applications of Meta Level Knowledge to the Construction, Maintenance and Use of Large Knowledge Bases
What computers can't do: a critique of artificial reason
(1972)- et al.
Subjective Bayesian methods for rule-based inference systems
Clinical Biostatistics XXXIX. The haze of Bayes, the aerial palaces of decision analysis, and the computerized Ouija board
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
HEME: A self-Improving Computer Program for Diagnosis-Oriented Analysis of Hematologic Diseases
IBM J. Res. Develop.
A System for Computer-Aided Diagnosis
Project MAC, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technical Report TR-44
Strategy Selection in Medical Diagnosis
Project MAC, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technical Report TR-153
Human Problem Solving
INTERNIST: A Computer-Based Consultation, Computer Networking in the University: Success and Potential
Toward the Simulation of Clinical Cognition: Taking a Present Illnes by Computer
The American Journal of Medicine
Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis
New Eng. J. Med.
Cited by (246)
Artificial intelligence and computational modeling
2022, 3D Lung Models for Regenerating Lung TissueArtificial intelligence in medicine: What is it doing for us today?
2019, Health Policy and TechnologyCitation Excerpt :Kulikowski and Weiss discussed the CASNET and EXPERT projects in the 1980s; the former was used in the context of glaucoma care, while the latter was established to help build models for reasoning in rheumatology and endocrinology [15]. As far back as 1959, an article in Science postulated how computers might fit into the process of patient diagnosis, acknowledging that “before computers can be used effectively … we need to know more about how the physician makes a medical diagnosis,”[16] with subsequent research aiming to elucidate this process in the context of computer operation [17]. In later years, research turned towards evaluating computer-aided diagnosis in comparison with the abilities of human physicians.
A fuzzy inference- fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based clinical decision support system for diagnosis of heart diseases
2018, Expert Systems with ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :Two CDSSs were developed in two distinguished areas including deductive and probabilistic during 1950–1960 because it was required to install CDSS on computers at that time. However, a third method, with its specific identity consisting of distinctive features of primary methods, was proposed by Ledley and Luste (1959), and Szolovits and Pauker (1978) two decades later. The HEME program, which was used for hematologic diseases diagnosis, was one of primary systems that applied the third method.
Checking the lists: A systematic review of electronic checklist use in health care
2017, Journal of Biomedical InformaticsCitation Excerpt :However, beyond this function it also acts as a memory aid to minimize biases and augments working and prospective memory. Flowchart checklists are beneficial where a categorical judgment of the status of a task or system can be made with reasonable certainty [13]. Clinical practice guidelines and decision support for diagnoses are often developed in the form of a flowchart, either paper-based or in electronic clinical decision support systems (CDSS).
- ☆
This research was supported by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (Public Health Service) under Grant Number 1 R01 MB 00107-03.
- ∗∗
Dr. Pauker is the recipient of a Research Career Development Award (Number 1K04GM-00349-01) from the General Medical Sciences Institute, National Institutes of Health.