The use of extinction models for species conservation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(88)90075-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The implications of the use of models from three fields in biology, namely, island biogeography, population genetics, and population dynamics, for the management of wildlife populations and the conservation of species are reviewed. The theory of island biogeography has little to offer to conservation practice because the formulation of the model is questionable, empirical evidence does not support it, and the predictions of the theory do not address directly the central problem of species extinctions. Unlike island biogeography, models in population genetics and population dynamics utilise population-specific information and provide answers to problems in terms of extinction probabilities and the change in population parameters in response to changes in specific environmental conditions.

References (87)

  • C. Margules et al.

    Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: A review

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1981)
  • C. Packer

    Inter-troop transfer and inbreeding avoidance in Papio anubis

    Anim. Behav.

    (1979)
  • K. Ralls et al.

    Genetic diversity in California sea otters: Theoretical considerations and management implications

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1983)
  • N. Richter-Dyn et al.

    On the extinction of a colonizing species

    Theor. Pop. Biol.

    (1972)
  • B.R. Skinner et al.

    Environmental requirements of three threatened plants on limestone glades in Southern Missouri

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1983)
  • M.E. Soulé et al.

    What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves?

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1986)
  • J. Terborgh et al.

    A method for siting parks and reserves with special reference to Columbia and Ecuador

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1983)
  • S.D. Tuljapurkar et al.

    Population dynamics in variable environments, I. Long-run growth rates and extinction

    Theor. Pop. Biol.

    (1980)
  • M. Turelli

    Random environments and stochastic calculus

    Theor. Pop. Biol.

    (1977)
  • I. Abbott

    Species richness, turnover, and equilibrium in insular floras near Perth, Western Australia

    Aust. J. Bot.

    (1977)
  • I. Abbott

    Factors determining the number of land bird species on islands around South-western Australia

    Oecologia

    (1978)
  • I. Abbott

    The meaning of z in species/area regressions and the study of species turnover in island biogeography

    Oikos

    (1983)
  • R. Akcakaya

    Neden Kelaynaklar?

    Bilim ve Teknik

    (1984)
  • M.S. Bartlett

    Stochastic population models in ecology and epidemiology

    (1960)
  • E.H. Bryant et al.

    The effect of an experimental bottleneck upon quantitative genetic variation in the housefly

    Genetics

    (1986)
  • R. Buckley

    The habitat unit model of island biogeography

    J. Biogeogr.

    (1982)
  • R.C. Buckley

    Distinguishing the effects of area and habitat type on island plant species richness by separating floristic elements and substrate types and controlling for island isolation

    J. Biogeogr.

    (1985)
  • R.C. Buckley et al.

    Beachcomber biogeography: Interception of dispersing propagules by islands

    J. Biogeogr.

    (1986)
  • N.J. Collar et al.

    Threatened birds of Africa and related islands

  • E.F. Connor et al.

    The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship

    Amer. Nat.

    (1979)
  • E.F. Connor et al.

    Model discrimination and expected slope values in species-area studies

    Amer. Nat.

    (1983)
  • C. Denniston

    Small population size and genetic diversity: Implications for endangered species

  • J.M. Diamond et al.

    Island biogeography and the design of nature reserves

  • P. Ehrlich et al.

    Extinction: The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species

    (1981)
  • T.J. Foose et al.

    Propagation plans

    Zoobiol.

    (1986)
  • R. Frankham et al.

    Selection in captive populations

    Zoobiol.

    (1986)
  • J.R. Franklin

    Evolutionary change in small populations

  • M. Game

    Best shape for nature reserves

    Nature, Lond.

    (1980)
  • F.R. Gehlback

    Investigation, evaluation and priority ranking of natural areas

    Biol. Conserv.

    (1975)
  • F.S. Gilbert

    The equilibrium theory of island biogeography: Fact or fiction?

    J. Biogeogr.

    (1980)
  • M.E. Gilpin et al.

    Subdivision of nature reserves and the maintenance of species diversity

    Nature, Lond.

    (1980)
  • L.R. Ginzburg et al.

    Quasiextinction probabilities as a measure of impact on population growth

    Risk Analysis

    (1982)
  • L.R. Ginzburg et al.

    Ecological risk assessment based on stochastic age-structured models of population growth

    Special Technical Testing Publ.

    (1984)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Linking the gaps between conservation research and conservation management of rare dipterocarps: A case study of Shorea lumutensis

      2006, Biological Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Proponents of a population genetic approach have stressed that understanding the organization of genetic diversity is key to the long-term survival of species, since genetic variation is a prerequisite for evolutionary adaptation (Berry, 1971; Lande and Barrowclough, 1987; Vrijenhoek, 1987; Hamrick et al., 1991) and short-term fitness (Huenneke, 1991). Others affirm that ecological research, i.e., characterizing the biotic interaction and habitat requirement of a species, is critical to sound conservation practices (Burgman et al., 1988; Simberloff, 1988; Brussard, 1991). To assess the status of plant species, and to prioritize among conservation approaches, the factors that affect population viability need to be understood.

    • A simple population viability analysis of the critically endangered Euphorbia clivicola R.A. Dyer under four management scenarios

      2000, Biological Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Population viability analysis (PVA) has traditionally been used to estimate minimum viable populations for threatened taxa. However, the greatest strength of PVA is the opportunity to evaluate the efficacy of various management options (Burgman et al., 1988; Shaffer, 1990; Boyce, 1992; Lindenmayer et al., 1993; Ruggiero et al., 1994; Mills et al., 1996), the objectives of which are to build populations up to adequate sizes and to reduce the risks of extinction (Given, 1994). Although a few recent PVAs have explicitly included management (Haig et al., 1993; Lindenmayer and Possingham, 1996; Drechsler, 1998), such applications have been especially lacking for threatened plants (but see Drechsler et al., 1999).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The order of authorship is random.

    View full text