Article
Sm-Nd isotopic evidence for the provenance of sediments from the Adelaide Fold Belt and southeastern Australia with implications for episodic crustal addition

https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(93)90116-EGet rights and content

Abstract

In South Australia, Late Proterozoic and Cambrian sediments were deposited in basins formed within Archaean to Early Mid-Proterozoic basement. These sequences were subsequently deformed and uplifted by the Cambro-Ordovician Delamerian Orogeny to form the Adelaide Fold Belt. In using the Adelaide Fold Belt to address models for lithospheric evolution, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms of basin formation and whether the sequences merely reflect reworking of existing cratonic material or if there were new crustal additions. This study presents geochemical and isotopic data on the sediments and basement rocks to complement existing data on the Delamerian igneous rocks as a means of investigating these questions.

The data reveal that the Archaean-Mid Proterozoic basement rocks of the Gawler Craton have Nd depleted mantle model ages which average about 2.6 Ga and ϵNd values at 800 Ma in the range −9 to −24 or at 500 Ma from −11 to −28. The Late Proterozoic Adelaidean sediments, however, have an average model age of 1.9 Ga and initial ϵNd values in the range −5 to −11. The sequence can be divided into lowermost rift-phase sediments derived from erosion of local Gawler Craton material, and a subsequent, widely distributed, thermal-sag-phase sedimentation whose isotopic signature is not compatible with the basement. This implies that a more primitive or juvenile source was accessed via broadening of the provenance region. The Cambrian sediments have slightly older model ages (2.1 Ga) and lower ϵNd (−9 to −13) and can be interpreted as mixtures of basement and reworked Adelaidean detritus.

The Early Palaeozoic sedimentary sequences of the Lachlan Fold Belt to the east have isotopic compositions very like the South Australian Late Proterozoic and Cambrian sequences. They have an average model age of 1.85 Ma but much higher K2O/Na2O. This indicates that the widespread flysch of eastern Australia is the result of recycling of the Late Proterozoic and Cambrian sediments by erosion of the Adelaide Fold Belt, with some modification by the mixture of the Cambro-Ordovician mafic and felsic magmatic rocks in this orogen.

Our data suggest regional, intracontinental, crustal evolution combined with recycling of older crustal material with new additions from the mantle during orogenesis and, to a lesser extent, episodes of extension and sedimentation.

References (66)

  • R.K. O'Nions et al.

    Melting and continent generation

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1988)
  • P. Richard et al.

    143Nd144Nd, a natural tracer: An application to oceanic basalts

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1976)
  • A.D. Smith et al.

    Neodymium isotopic evolution of the Precambrian mantle

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1989)
  • S.P. Turner et al.

    Derivation of some A-type magmas by fractionation of basaltic magma and an example from the Padthaway Ridge, South Australia

    Lithos

    (1992)
  • C.C. Von Der Borch

    Tectonophysics

    (1980)
  • B.L. Weaver et al.

    Lewisian gneiss geochemistry and Archaean crustal development models

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1981)
  • E. Williams

    Tasman Fold Belt system in Tasmania

    Tectonophysics

    (1978)
  • G.M. Young et al.

    Stratigraphy and sedimentology of Sturtian glaciogenic deposits in the western part of the North Flinders Basin, South Australia

    Precambrian Res.

    (1988)
  • J.X. Zhao et al.

    Sm-Nd and U-Pb zircon isotopic constraints on the provenance of sediments from the amadeus Basin, central Australia: Evidence for REE fractionation

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1992)
  • R.L. Armstrong

    Radiogenic isotopes: The case for crustal recycling on a near-steady-state no-continental-growth Earth

    Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London

    (1981)
  • R.L. Armstrong

    The persistent myth of crustal growth

    Aust. J. Earth. Sci.

    (1991)
  • N.T. Arndt et al.

    Use and abuse of crust formation ages

    Geology

    (1987)
  • D.N. Awwiller et al.

    Diagenetic modification of Sm-Nd model ages in Tertiary sandstones and shales, Texas Gulf Coast

    Geology

    (1991)
  • P.W. Ballie

    A Palaeozoic suture in eastern Gondwanaland

    Tectonics

    (1985)
  • R.A. Burwash et al.

    Source terranes for Proterozoic sedimentary rocks in southern British Columbia: Nd isotopic and petrographic evidence

    Canadian J. Earth Sci.

    (1988)
  • R. Cas

    Palaeogeographic and tectonic development of the Lachlan Fold Belt southeastern Australia

    Geol. Soc. Aust. Spec. Publ.

    (1983)
  • R.P. Coats

    Late Proterozoic (Adelaidean) tillites of the Adelaide Geosyncline

  • Y.D. Chen et al.

    Dating the cratonic lower crust by SHRIMP: A U-Th-P isotopic study on zircons from lower crustal xenoliths from kimberlite pipes

    Geol. Soc. Aust. Abst.

    (1992)
  • J.A. Cooper et al.

    Ion-probe zircon dating of a mid-Early Cambrian tuff in South Australia

    J. Geol. Soc. London

    (1992)
  • A.J. Crawford et al.

    Geochemistry of Late Proterozoic tholeiitic flood basalts, Adelaide Geosyncline, South Australia

    Geol. Soc. Aust. Spec. Publ.

    (1990)
  • B. Daily et al.

    Geology

  • J.F. Dewey et al.

    Growth and differentiation of the continental crust

    Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London

    (1981)
  • C.M. Fanning

    Petrology, structure and geochronology of some high grade metamorphic rocks at Fishery Bay and Cape Carnot, Southern Eyre Peninsula

  • Cited by (116)

    • New U[sbnd]Pb, Hf and O isotope constraints on the provenance of sediments from the Adelaide Rift Complex – Documenting the key Neoproterozoic to early Cambrian succession

      2020, Gondwana Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Kanmantoo Group had more negative εNd values and slightly older model ages. Neither interval was a good match for the even more negative εNd values and older model ages derived from Gawler Craton rocks, although Turner et al. (1993a) and Turner et al. (1993b) suggested that the Kanmantoo isotopic signature could be explained by the mixing of Gawler Craton derived sediment with reworked Neoproterozoic material. The SmNd and Sr isotopic signature of the Kanmantoo Group was further investigated by Haines et al. (2009) who analysed closely associated mudstone–sandstone and pelite–psammite pairs (collected <50 cm apart stratigraphically) throughout the group.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Present address: Department of Earth Sciences, Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, England.

    View full text