Patterns of recruitment of sessile invertebrates in two subtidal habitats

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(83)90162-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Recruitment of sessile marine invertebrates onto small panels at two subtidal sites in southern Australia varied considerably on all spatial and temporal scales. Recruitment at West Lakes was consistently higher than at Edithburgh, usually by an order of magnitude or more. There were strong seasonal trends in the number of recruits and the number of colonizing species per panel at West Lakes, but these trends were unclear at Edithburgh. Small panels received fewer recruits than did larger panels, although the number of recruits per cm2 did not change.

Individual species showed similar patterns of recruitment. The temporal pattern varied from year-round settlement, with seasonal peaks (most serpulids), to regular recruitment at the same time each year (Didemnum sp., Botrylloides leachii Savigny), to irregular, intense peaks of recruitment (Electroma georgiana Quoy and Gaimard, Ciona intestinalis (Linnaeus)). Even those species that showed regular peaks in recruitment showed great variation between years in the magnitude of the peaks.

The spatial pattern of recruitment of individual species varied from random (Spirorbis spp.) to strongly aggregated (Elminius modestus Darwin, Mania ione Gray). Aggregated patterns of recruitment were probably due to settlement near adult conspecifics (Elminius modestus, Balanus amphitrite Darwin), or to “swarms” of larvae settling together (Hydroides norvegica (Gunnerus)).

There was little synchrony between the two sites. Major peaks in recruitment at one site were not accompanied by peaks at the other site, and even a good year for a particular species at one site was not necessarily matched for the species at the other site, providing little support for the concept of generally “good” or “bad” years for a coastal region as a whole.

Replicated panels that were immersed at the same time varied greatly in their recruitment. This was partly explained by the distance between panels: the similarity between a pair of panels sometimes decreased as the distance between them increased. This relation rarely explained >20% of the variation in similarities, however. Small panels were generally less similar to each other than were large panels. The increase in similarity as panels became closer together could not always be explained by gregarious behaviour of larvae, and was probably due to small-scale patchiness in the distribution of larvae in the plankton. There remained a large amount of variation in recruitment that could not be explained by the behaviour of individual species or by patchiness in the plankton.

References (35)

  • J.D. Andrews

    Pelecypoda: Ostreidae

  • J.B.C. Jackson

    Habitat area, colonisation, and development of epifaunal community structure

  • A.N. Sastry

    Pelecypoda (excluding Ostreidae)

  • R.S. Bowman et al.

    Annual fluctuations in the recruitment of Patella vulgata

    J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K.

    (1977)
  • L.W. Buss et al.

    Competitive networks: non-transitive competitive relationships in cryptic coral reef environments

    Am. Nat.

    (1979)
  • A.J. Butler et al.

    Size distributions and growth of the fanshell Pinna bicolor Gmelin (Mollusca: Eulamellibranchia) in South Australia

    Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res.

    (1979)
  • A.J. Butler et al.

    Distribution of Pinna bicolor Gmelin (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in South Australia, with notes on recruitment

    Trans. R. Soc. South Aust.

    (1981)
  • W.R. Coe et al.

    Growth of sedentary organisms on experimental blocks and plates for 9 successive years at the pier of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography

    Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr. Tech. Ser.

    (1937)
  • J.H. Connell

    Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities. A model and evidence from field experiments

  • D.J. Crisp

    Territorial behaviour in barnacle settlement

    J. Exp. Biol.

    (1960)
  • P.K. Dayton

    Ecology: science or a religion?

  • P.K. Dayton

    Competition, disturbance, and community organisation: the provision and subsequent utilisation of space in a rocky intertidal community

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1971)
  • E.J. Denley et al.

    Experiments on factors influencing settlement, survival and growth in two species of barnacles in New South Wales

    J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.

    (1979)
  • A.M. Kay

    The organisation of sessile guilds on pier pilings

  • A.M. Kay et al.

    Occupation of patches in the epifaunal communities on pier pilings and the bivalve Pinna bicolor at Edithburgh, South Australia

    Oecologia (Berlin)

    (1981)
  • M.J. Keough

    Community dynamics of the epifauna of the bivalve Pinna bicolor Gmelin

  • M.J. Keough et al.

    Recruitment of marine invertebrates: the roles of active larval choices and early mortality

    Oecologia (Berlin)

    (1982)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, U.S.A.

    View full text