Spatial variation in feeding, prey distribution and food limitation of juvenile flounder Rhombosolea tapirina Günther
References (30)
- et al.
Fish predation on meiobenthos: field experiments with juvenile spot Leiostomus xanthurus Lacépède
J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.
(1989) - et al.
Field experiments on the role of epibenthic predators in determining prey densities in an estuarine mudflat
Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci.
(1985) Spatio-temporal dynamics of a meiobenthic copepod and the impact of predationdisturbance
J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.
(1984)- et al.
The food and growth of 0-group flatfish on nursery grounds in the Clyde Sea area
Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci.
(1983) - et al.
Juvenile spot (Pisces) and grass shrimp predation on meiobenthos in muddy and sandy substrata
J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.
(1987) - et al.
Settlement, growth and mortality of postlarval plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in the western Wadden Sea
Neth. J. Sea Res.
(1982) - et al.
Benthic harpacticoids as a food source for fish
Mar. Biol.
(1982) Environmental study of Port Phillip Bay
- et al.
Abundance and growth of 0-group plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) in relation to food abundance in a coastal nursery area
- et al.
A broad view of variability and persistence in the Northumberland benthic fauna — 1971–1985
J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K.
(1986)
Life history and production of three amphipod species on Georges Bank
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
An ecological study of the Tasmanian flounder
Predation on meiofauna by juvenile fish in a western Mediterranean flatfish nursery ground
Mar. Biol.
Size selective predation by juvenile chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) on epibenthic prey in Puget Sound
J. Fish. Res. Board Can.
Goby (Pisces:Gobiidae) interactions with meiofauna and small macrofauna
Bull. Mar. Sci.
Cited by (39)
Field evidence of differential food utilization of phytal harpacticoids collected from Fucus serratus indicated by δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N stable isotopes
2010, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf ScienceCitation Excerpt :Harpacticoid copepods are small, mostly benthic, crustaceans found in marine, brackish, and freshwater habitats around the world. Despite their importance in the food webs (e.g. Alheit and Scheibel, 1982; Shaw and Jenkins, 1992; Clarke, 1999; Ingólfsson and Kristjánsson, 2002) their trophic relationships and seasonal variations in utilization of food sources are poorly known. Based on gut content and on observations, they are known to feed on many different food items, diatoms, detritus, macroalgal tissues, bacteria and fungi (review by Hicks and Coull, 1983).
Are flatfish nursery grounds richer in benthic prey?
2009, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf ScienceCitation Excerpt :The presence of abundant food resources in the nursery grounds does not necessarily imply the full availability of it for the juvenile flatfishes. Shaw and Jenkins (1992) found the impact of juvenile flatfishes on the abundance of their prey to be generally insignificant, or at least insufficient to reduce prey levels to a point where they become limiting. However, benthic macro invertebrates are intensively consumed by a variety of predators, such as aquatic birds and nekton (mostly fish and crustaceans) and this interspecific competition might result in limitation of the food resources (Rosa et al., 2008).
Detecting the effects of physical disturbance on benthic assemblages in a subtropical estuary: A Beyond BACI approach
2006, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and EcologyEffects of harvesting callianassid (ghost) shrimps on subtropical benthic communities
2005, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and EcologyTo what extent are the fish compositions at nearshore sites along a heterogeneous coast related to habitat type?
2004, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf ScienceSize-related shifts in the habitat associations of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus): Field observations and laboratory experiments with sediments and prey
2001, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology