An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data

https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90019-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Digital analysis of remotely sensed data has become an important component of many earth-science studies. These data are often processed through a set of preprocessing or “clean-up” routines that includes a correction for atmospheric scattering, often called haze. Various methods to correct or remove the additive haze component have been developed, including the widely used dark-object subtraction technique. A problem with most of these methods is that the haze values for each spectral band are selected independently. This can create problems because atmospheric scattering is highly wavelength-dependent in the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum and the scattering values are correlated with each other. Therefore, multispectral data such as from the Landsat Thematic Mapper and Multispectral Scanner must be corrected with haze values that are spectral band dependent. An improved dark-object subtraction technique is demonstrated that allows the user to select a relative atmospheric scattering model to predict the haze values for all the spectral bands from a selected starting band haze value. The improved method normalizes the predicted haze values for the different gain and offset parameters used by the imaging system. Examples of haze value differences between the old and improved methods for Thematic Mapper Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 are 40.0, 13.0, 12.0, 8.0, 5.0, and 2.0 vs. 40.0, 13.2, 8.9, 4.9, 16.7, and 3.3, respectively, using a relative scattering model of a clear atmosphere. In one Landsat multispectral scanner image the haze value differences for Bands 4, 5, 6, and 7 were 30.0, 50.0, 50.0, and 40.0 for the old method vs. 30.0, 34.4, 43.6, and 6.4 for the new method using a relative scattering model of a hazy atmosphere.

References (20)

  • C.J. Robinove et al.

    Arid land monitoring using Landsat albedo difference images

    Remote Sens. Environ.

    (1981)
  • F.J. Ahern et al.

    Landsat atmospheric corrections at CCRS

  • F.J. Ahern et al.

    An automated method for producing reflectance-enhanced Landsat images

  • W.L. Alford et al.

    Radiometric accuracy assessment of Landsat-4 Multispectral Scanner data

  • J.L. Barker et al.

    Prelaunch absolute radiometric calibration of the reflective bands on the Landsat-4 protoflight Thematic Mapper

  • J.R. Carr et al.

    Signature extension versus retraining for multispectral classification of surface mines in arid regions

    Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens.

    (1983)
  • P.S. Chavez

    Atmospheric, solar, and MTF corrections for ERTS digital imagery

  • P.S. Chavez et al.

    Computer enhancement techniques of Landsat MSS digital images for land use/cover assessments

  • J.A. Curcio

    Evaluation of atmospheric aerosol particle size distribution from scattering measurement in the visible and infrared

    J. Opt. Soc. Am.

    (1961)
  • B. Holben et al.

    An examination of spectral band ratioing to reduce the topographic effects on remotely sensed data

    Int. J. Remote Sens.

    (1981)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (1463)

  • Unsupervised single image dehazing — A contour approach

    2024, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
  • A fast and robust cirrus removal method for Landsat 8/9 images

    2024, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
View all citing articles on Scopus

Publication authorized by the Director, U.S. Geological Survey on 4 April 1986.

View full text