Energy resource allocation incorporating qualitative and quantitative criteria: An integrated model using goal programming and AHP

https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(95)00013-CGet rights and content

Abstract

Energy resource allocation presents a multi-criteria decision making problem with the criteria being quantitative and/or qualitative. Solving such a problem requires an integrated approach. In this paper, an integrated model using goal programming and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been developed for energy resource allocation. It incorporates nine quantitative and three qualitative criteria. The model has been applied to the household sector of Madras, India. A detailed sensitivity analysis has also been carried out. Three additional scenarios have been developed. Use of the model suggested: natural gas, fuelwood and solar thermal for cooking; biogas and electricity generated from fuelwood for water pumping; and all decentralized electricity generation technologies for lighting and operating household appliances. Grid electricity was perferred only for lighting.

References (73)

  • R. Ramanathan et al.

    Group preference aggregation methods employed in the AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages

    Eur. J. Oper. Res.

    (1994)
  • A.K. Rajvanshi et al.

    Development and operational experience with topless wood gasifier running a 3.75 kW diesel engine pump set

    Biomass

    (1989)
  • C. Romero

    A survey of generalised goal programming (1970–1982)

    Eur. J. Oper. Res.

    (1986)
  • D.A.J. Wase et al.

    Biogas—fact or fantasy

    Biomass

    (1984)
  • W.C. Wedley

    Combining qualitative and quantitative factors—an analytic hierarchy approach

    Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci.

    (1990)
  • M. Zeleny

    The pros and cons of goal programming

    Computers Oper. Res.

    (1981)
  • Advisory Board on Energy

    Towards a perspective on Energy Demand and Supply in India in 2004/5

    (1985)
  • A.N. Agrawal et al.

    INDIA: Economic Information Year Book: 1988–1989

    (1988)
  • K.N. Baidya

    Policy issues: the unresolved question of Indian social forestry—a viewpoint

    Int. J. Environ. Studies

    (1985)
  • C.O. Benjamin et al.

    Planning Facilities at the University of Missouri-Rolla

    Interfaces

    (1992)
  • R.J. Brown et al.

    Life Cycle Costing: A Practical Guide for Energy Managers

    (1980)
  • J.R. Canada et al.

    Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems

    (1989)
  • H.L. Chandok
  • O.P. Chawla

    Advances in Biogas Technology

    (1986)
  • M.K. Chetty et al.

    Rural energy consumption patterns with multiple objectives

    Int. J. Energy Res.

    (1988)
  • C.A. De Kluyver

    On the importance of goal norming in non-preemptive goal programming

    Opsearch

    (1979)
  • J.S. Dyer

    Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

    Mgmt Sci.

    (1990)
  • J.S. Dyer et al.

    Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: The next ten years

    Mgmt Sci.

    (1992)
  • The Economic Survey 1992–1993

    (1993)
  • S.I. Gass

    A process for determining priorities and weights for large-scale linear goal programmes

    J. Oper. Res. Soc.

    (1986)
  • J. Goldemberg et al.

    Energy for a Sustainable World

    (1988)
  • B.L. Golden et al.

    Applications of the analytic hierarchy process: a categorized, annotated bibiliography

  • J. Gururaja

    Progress of photovoltaic application in India

  • P.T. Harker et al.

    The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process

    Mgmt Sci.

    (1987)
  • J. Herrald et al.

    A note on the limitation of goal programming as observed in resource allocation for marine environmental protection

    Nav. Res. Logist. Q.

    (1978)
  • Cited by (140)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text