Human communication with pigs: The behavioural response of pigs to specific human signals

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(86)90021-3Get rights and content

Abstract

A knowledge of the influence of behavioural and non-behavioural characteristics of humans on the behavioural responses of pigs to humans is required for the development of approach and handling procedures by stockpersons which achieve and maintain human—animal relationships in which the animals are not fearful of humans.

Three experiments were conducted to compare the nature of several possible signals which humans may release when interacting with pigs. The nature of the signals was compared by quantifying the approach behaviour of the pig to the experimenter releasing the appropriate signals in four 3-min tests over an 8-day period. Pigs approached the experimenter significantly more (P < 0.05) when he did not approach, squatted, had bare hands or did not initiate interactions compared with when he did approach, stood erect, had gloved hands or initiated interactions with the pig, respectively.

References (9)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Intestinal Evisceration in Children From the Bite of the Domestic Pig, Sus scrofa domesticus: A Report of Two Cases

    2019, Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    This could be attributed to the discrepancy between the size of the animal and child and the perceived threat of the victim by the pig. It was previously shown that young pigs considered a human who adopts a low squat position to be less threatening than a human who stands tall and erect.15 This may have contributed to the behavior noted in our cases.

  • Domestic piglets (Sus scrofa domestica) are attentive to human voice and able to discriminate some prosodic features

    2019, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    It could be that this population of piglets is somehow less sensitive to sounds, for an as yet unkown reason. However the absence of spontaneous discrimination between emotions by piglets agrees with the findings of Hemsworth et al. (1986), who compared reactions to a loud and harsh voice and a soft and quiet voice broadcast in the presence of a motionless human. Piglets in our experiment may have been too young to recognise human functional prosodies.

  • Welfare assessment in porcine biomedical research - Suggestion for an operational tool

    2011, Research in Veterinary Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Fear is a significant aspect of welfare in laboratory animals (Koolhaas et al., 2001). Typical fear evoking events for pigs in captivity are isolation (Forkman et al., 1995), mixing with unfamiliar pigs (Jensen, 1994), exposure to a novel environment (Mormede et al., 1984; Herskin and Jensen, 2000) and exposure to and handling by humans (e.g. Hemsworth et al., 1986). Common to these is the element of novelty, which is often associated with negative emotional responses in animals (Boissy, 1995).

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Present address: Animal Research Institute, Victorian Department of Agriculture, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia.

View full text