Automated mapping of visual impacts in utility corridors
References (38)
The phenomenological contribution to environmental psychology
J. Environ. Psychol.
(1982)The perception of dimensions of space and levels of infrastructure and its application in landscape planning
Landscape Plann.
(1986)- et al.
Visual absorption capability
The Experience of Landscape
(1975)Prospects and refuges re-visited
Landscape J.
(1984)- et al.
Geographic information systems in right-of-way management: the status and uses of current computer technology
- et al.
Visual simulation of electricity transmission towers
Landscape Austr.
(1985) - et al.
Visual impact of high voltage transmission facilities
Visual Resource Management Program
(1980)Visual Simulation Techniques
(1980)
Assessing scenic quality: transmission line siting
Landscape
MOVIE.BYU
Psychological factors in landscape appraisal
Environ. Behav.
Setting technical factors for visual assessment procedures
Measuring Landscape Aesthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method
Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality
Measuring the visibility of high voltage transmission facilities in the Pacific Northwest
Lattice towers have low visual impact
Electr. World
The Perception of the Visual World
Cited by (35)
Towards landscape visual quality evaluation: methodologies, technologies, and recommendations
2022, Ecological IndicatorsAnalysis and visualization of temporal variation in visual impacts
2021, Landscape and Urban PlanningCitation Excerpt :However, conditions are seldom that clear and vary though each day. To map reduced visibility impacts, following Hadrian et al. (1988), the downward slope of the line of decrease with distance was increased. This had the effect of reducing both the impact of each turbine, by increasing amounts at larger distances, and the distances at which their impacts reached zero.
Proposing an adapted visibility analysis methodology for the building height codes of the Shiraz development plan
2020, Sustainable Cities and SocietyCitation Excerpt :It is explained that the visibility of a landmark decreases exponentially by raise of the distance between the observer and the object. To be more precise, the visual impact of the distance of 1000 m diminishes to 25 % in comparison to 500 m distance and decreases drastically to 10 % when the object is 2000 m away (Hadrian, Bishop, & Mitcheltree, 1988; The World Bank, 2007). Some scholars have tried to include the distance impact by defining weighting options (Domingo-Santos et al., 2011; Wagtendonk & Vermaat, 2014).
The contribution of a GIS-based landscape assessment model to a scientifically rigorous approach to visual impact assessment
2019, Landscape and Urban PlanningCitation Excerpt :This is not to say that researchers have not investigated landscape assessment approaches. For example, Hadrian, Bishop and Mitcheltree (1988) present an approach to using a GIS to assess visual impacts that included the effect of viewing distance and visual magnitude, as well as a number of other features. However, these examples were not adopted by practicing landscape architects and the reasons for this have gone unexamined.
An index of viewer sensitivity to scenery while engaged in recreation activities on U.S. National Forests
2019, Landscape and Urban PlanningCitation Excerpt :Visual impact assessment is the relatively straightforward process of describing the visual characteristics of a proposed project, determining its visibility in the surround landscape, and describing the visual magnitude of the project as seen from various viewpoints. The general process for conducting this analysis has been understood for decades (Hadrian, Bishop, & Mitcheltree, 1988). The analysis may be extended to describe the visual contrast of the project with the existing landscape (BLM, 1986b).
- ∗
Dr. Bishop is currently on leave from the School of Environmental Planning, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052 (Australia).