Specialist interest article
Socioeconomic status and cancer mortality and incidence in Melbourne

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5379(91)90147-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Data were obtained for all deaths registered between 1979–1983, and for all new cancers recorded at the Victorian Cancer Registry between 1982–1983, in residents of Melbourne. A socioeconomic status (SES) measure had been produced for each local government area (LGA) by principal components analysis of sociodemographic variables recorded at the 1981 census. A SES score from 1 to 10 was assigned to each death and cancer. Population data from the census were similarly scored. Age standardised rates for all cause mortality, for mortality from all causes other than cancer and for both incidence and mortality of total cancers, cancer of the stomach, colon, rectum, lung, female breast, cervix, uterus, prostate and bladder, and for melanoma, lymphoma and leukaemia were analysed as a function of SES decile using weighted linear regression. Despite the limited number of years of data and the misclassification of the SES score, analyses showed there were inequitable distributions of mortality, and of some major cancers, across social strata in Melbourne during the early 1980s. The incidences of cancer of the breast, colon, prostate and melanoma were all positively associated with SES, while the incidences of cancer of the stomach, lung and cervix demonstrated negative SES gradients. For cancers where incidence showed a significant SES gradient there was a similar SES gradient with mortality. These patterns are consistent with the literature and implicate SES differences in education and access to services. Implications for health policy are discussed.

References (29)

  • KN Ross

    The development of the 1984 “Indicator of Disadvantage” and its application to resource allocation decisions for the disadvantaged schools program in Australia

    (1984)
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics

    Characteristics of Persons and Dwellings

    (1983)
  • J Waterhouse et al.

    Standard populations used for the computation of age standardised and truncated standardised incidence rates

  • RA Becker et al.

    An Interactive Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics

    (1984)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Socio-demographic disadvantage and distant summary stage of cancer at diagnosis-A population-based study in New South Wales

      2016, Cancer Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, good prognosis cancers that are less likely to be admitted to hospital, such as melanoma, are more likely to have country of birth information missing. Area-level deprivation measures are prone to ecological bias and misclassification [48–50]. Socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival have been shown to be diluted when larger geographic areas have been used [51].

    • Socio-economic status and the risk of liver cancer mortality: A prospective study in Korean men

      2008, Public Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      In recent times, there has been growing interest in socio-economic inequality and its relationship with specific cancers. Contemporary studies have shown a negative socio-economic gradient in mortality for oropharyngeal, oesophageal, stomach, larynx and lung cancer,1–3 whereas a positive gradient has been observed for colon cancer,2–4 prostate cancer5,6 and melanoma2,3,6 in men. Liver cancer is the third most common cancer globally, causing approximately 662,000 deaths each year.7

    • Introduction to oncogeriatrics

      2008, NPG Neurologie - Psychiatrie - Geriatrie
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text