European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology
Specialist interest articleSocioeconomic status and cancer mortality and incidence in Melbourne
References (29)
- et al.
Mortality decline and widening social inequalities
Lancet
(1986) Social class as estimated by occupational prestige and mortality in Australian males in the 1970s
Commun Health Studies
(1985)- et al.
Socioeconomic status and mortality: a Brisbane area analysis
Commun Health Studies
(1987) - et al.
Importance of the male factor in cancer of the cervix
Lancet
(1982) - et al.
Socio-demographic mortality differentials: longitudinal study 1971–1975
- et al.
Association between mortality among women and socioeconomic factors in general practices in Edinburgh: an application of small area statistics
Br Med J
(1987) - et al.
Inequalities in women's health: looking at mortality differentials using an alternative approach
Br Med J
(1988) Cancer Mortality by Occupation and Social Class 1851–1971
(1982)- et al.
Determinants of case survival for cancers of the lung, colon, breast and cervix in South Australia
Med J Aust
(1984)
The development of the 1984 “Indicator of Disadvantage” and its application to resource allocation decisions for the disadvantaged schools program in Australia
Characteristics of Persons and Dwellings
Standard populations used for the computation of age standardised and truncated standardised incidence rates
An Interactive Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics
Cited by (52)
Socio-demographic disadvantage and distant summary stage of cancer at diagnosis-A population-based study in New South Wales
2016, Cancer EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :Therefore, good prognosis cancers that are less likely to be admitted to hospital, such as melanoma, are more likely to have country of birth information missing. Area-level deprivation measures are prone to ecological bias and misclassification [48–50]. Socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival have been shown to be diluted when larger geographic areas have been used [51].
Socio-economic status and the risk of liver cancer mortality: A prospective study in Korean men
2008, Public HealthCitation Excerpt :In recent times, there has been growing interest in socio-economic inequality and its relationship with specific cancers. Contemporary studies have shown a negative socio-economic gradient in mortality for oropharyngeal, oesophageal, stomach, larynx and lung cancer,1–3 whereas a positive gradient has been observed for colon cancer,2–4 prostate cancer5,6 and melanoma2,3,6 in men. Liver cancer is the third most common cancer globally, causing approximately 662,000 deaths each year.7
Introduction to oncogeriatrics
2008, NPG Neurologie - Psychiatrie - GeriatrieProspective study of educational background and stomach cancer in Japan
2002, Preventive MedicineThe use of census data for determining race and education as SES indicators: A validation study
2001, Annals of Epidemiology