On the relative efficiency of estimators which include the initial observations in the estimation of seemingly unrelated regressions with first-order autoregressive disturbances☆
References (20)
Useful invariance results for generalized regression models
Journal of Econometrics
(1980)Omission of an observation from a regression analysis: A discussion on efficiency loss, with applications
Journal of Econometrics
(1981)- et al.
A maximum likelihood procedure for regression with autocorrelated errors
Econometrica
(1978) - et al.
Maximum likelihood estimation of singular equation systems with autoregressive disturbances
International Economic Review
(1979) Efficiency of least squares estimation of linear trend when residuals are autocorrelated
Econometrica
(1979)Introductory econometrics
(1978)Introduction to matrices with applications in statistics
(1969)- et al.
Estimation of seemingly unrelated regressions with vector autoregressive errors
Journal of the American Statistical Association
(1973) - et al.
Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics
(1982) A transformation used to circumvent the problem of autocorrelation
Econometrica
(1968)
Cited by (17)
Disclosure risk reduction for generalized linear model output in a remote analysis system
2017, Data and Knowledge EngineeringDifferential impact of Korean banking system reforms on bank productivity
2010, Journal of Banking and FinanceCitation Excerpt :We address this problem by using a variant of the Prais and Winsten (1954) estimator proposed by Park and Mitchell (1980) to make first-order autocorrelation adjustments to the variables. This estimator is consistent and performs especially well for short time series and trended data in relation to several other estimates (Doran and Griffiths, 1983). It also reduces the extent to which the serial correlation coefficient tends to be underestimated by simpler methods (Kmenta and Gilbert, 1970).
Economies of scope in the U.S. telecommunications industry
1998, Information Economics and PolicyA field study of the impact of a performance-based incentive plan
1996, Journal of Accounting and EconomicsA generalized test for perfect aggregation
1992, Economics LettersCompetition, fee-for-service requirements, and government performance: Evidence on the Federal Reserve
2002, Journal of Accounting and Public PolicyCitation Excerpt :As in Banker et al. (1996), I control for autocorrelation by using a variant of the Prais–Winsten (1954) estimator proposed by Park and Mitchell (1980) to make first-order autocorrelation adjustments to the variables. This estimator is consistent and performs especially well for short time series and trended data relative to several other estimators (Doran and Griffiths, 1983). It also reduces the extent to which the autocorrelation coefficient tends to be underestimated (Kmenta and Gilbert, 1970).
- ☆
A substantial part of this work was done while Doran was a Fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation at the University of Bonn. Also, we are grateful to an anonymous referee for some valuable suggestions.