Elsevier

Neuroscience

Volume 47, Issue 1, March 1992, Pages 185-196
Neuroscience

Impulse conduction in sympathetic nerve terminals in the guinea-pig vas deferens and the role of the pelvic ganglia

https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(92)90131-KGet rights and content

Abstract

Focal extracellular recording techniques were used to study nerve impulse propagation and the intermittent transmitter release mechanism in sympathetic nerve terminals of the guinea-pig vas deferens in vitro. In particular, the nature of impulse propagation in postganglionic nerve fibres was characterized following pre- or postganglionic stimulation. Conventional intracellular recording techniques were also used to study directly ganglionic transmission in cell bodies in the anterior pelvic ganglia. When brief electrical stimuli were applied to the hypogastric nerve trunk close to the prostatic end of the vas deferens, the nerve terminal impulses recorded extracellularly could be evoked either directly by stimulation of the parent axon (i.e. postganglionically) or indirectly by stimulation of the preganglionic nerve fibre. In 364 separate recordings, nerve terminal impulse conduction failure was not observed during trains of stimuli at 1 Hz. However, apparent “intermittent conduction” of nerve impulses was noted on 16 occasions. In these fibres, the degree of intermittent conduction decreased as the frequency of stimulation was increased. Conduction in these intermittent fibres was reversibly interrupted by removing calcium from the Krebs' solution or by the addition of the ganglion blocker, hexamethonium (30–100 μM). Thus, the cause of intermittent conduction is failure of the transmission of excitation in the sympathetic ganglia. Impulses evoked by postganglionic stimulation never failed to propagate into the nerve terminals, and changes in the shape or amplitude of the nerve terminal impulse during trains of stimuli were not detected. One effect of stimulation was a frequency-dependent increase in the latency of the nerve terminal impulse which developed during the train of stimuli. Thus, intermittence of transmitter release from individual varicosities cannot be attributed to failure of impulse propagation in sympathetic nerve terminals. Transmission in the anterior pelvic ganglia was investigated directly by making intracellular recordings from cell bodies whose terminals projected to the vas deferens. Many cell bodies received a strong synaptic input which generated an action potential in the postganglionic cell body on a one-to-one basis. However, in some cell bodies there was a low safety factor for the generation of the action potential by the excitatory postsynaptic potential. The safety factor for generating an action potential in the postganglionic cell body was raised by increasing the frequency of stimulation.

These findings suggest that peripheral ganglia are not simple one-to-one relay stations, but may well play an important role in controlling the patterns of nerve impulse traffic in postganglionic sympathetic neurons.

References (33)

  • ÅstrandP. et al.

    Time course of transmitter action at the sympathetic neuroeffector junction in vascular and non-vascular smooth muscle

    J. Physiol.

    (1988)
  • BarnesS. et al.

    Veratridine modifies open sodium channels

    J. gen. Physiol.

    (1988)
  • BlackmanJ.G. et al.

    Transmission from preganglionic fibres in the hypogastric nerve to peripheral ganglia of male guinea-pigs

    J. Physiol.

    (1969)
  • BlakeleyA.G.H. et al.

    The packeted release of transmitter from the sympathetic nerves of the guinea-pig vas deferons: an electrophysiological study

    J. Physiol.

    (1979)
  • BlakeleyA.G.H. et al.

    Local regulation of transmitter release from rodent sympathetic nerve terminals?

    J. Physiol.

    (1982)
  • BrockJ.A. et al.

    Relationship between the nerve action potential and transmitter release from sympathetic postganglionic nerve terminals

    Nature

    (1987)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Plasticity of pelvic autonomic ganglia and urogenital innervation

      2006, International Review of Cytology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some of the best‐characterized pelvic ganglion neurons are the vasodilator neurons innervating the uterine artery of guinea pigs (Jobling et al., 2003, 2004; Morris et al., 2005). Various groups have studied membrane and channel properties in adult pelvic ganglion neurons (Akasu et al., 1986; Blackman et al., 1969; Booth and de Groat, 1979; Brock and Cunnane, 1992; Crowcroft and Szurszewski, 1971; Gallagher et al., 1982; Griffith et al., 1980; Hanani and Maudlej, 1995; Jobling et al., 2003; Kanjhan et al., 2003; Rogers et al., 1990; Tabatabai et al., 1986; Zhong et al., 1998), but few of these studies have combined electrical recordings with prior retrograde tracing from a variety of pelvic organs or post hoc immunostaining for transmitters or other neuroactive substances. Patch clamp studies on isolated rat pelvic ganglion neurons show that bladder neurons do not have features to distinguish them from the entire population of pelvic neurons (Yoshimura and de Groat, 1996), suggesting that this approach may not be worthwhile, but further organs should perhaps be studied before concluding that no organ specificity of electrical properties exists.

    • ω-conotoxin CVID inhibits a pharmacologically distinct voltage-sensitive calcium channel associated with transmitter release from preganglionic nerve terminals

      2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Intracellular recordings were made from individual ganglion cells using glass microelectrodes filled with 5 m potassium acetate (resistances 70–120 megohms). Conventional intracellular recording techniques were used as described previously (17, 18). Membrane potentials were recorded through a headstage connected to an Axoclamp-2A amplifier (Axon Instruments Inc., Union City, CA) in bridge mode and stored on a digital audio tape using a digital tape recorder (DTR-1204, BioLogic Science Instruments, Claix, France).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text