Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 56, Issues 1–2, November 1991, Pages 133-142
Hearing Research

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in deaf kittens: Effects on cochlear nucleus morphology

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(91)90162-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study examines the effects of long-term electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve on the morphology of neurons in the cochlear nucleus in young, sensorineural deaf animals. Kittens, systemically deafened using kanamycin and ethacrynic acid, received bilateral cochlear implants and were stimulated unilaterally for periods of up to four months. After sacrifice, cross-sectional areas of neuron somata were measured with an image-analysis system and compared using nonparametric statistics. The areas of cell somata within the anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) on the stimulated side were significantly larger than those of corresponding somata on the control, unstimulated side (P $̌0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference among dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) neurons. These results indicate that long-term electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve can at least partially negate some effects of early postnatal auditory deprivation at the level of the cochlear nucleus.

References (52)

  • D.B. Webster

    Auditory neuronal sizes after a unilateral conductive hearing loss

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1983)
  • D.B. Webster

    Conductive hearing loss affects the growth of the cochlear nuclei over an extended period of time

    Hearing Res.

    (1988)
  • M.T.T. Wong-Riley et al.

    Changes in endogenous enzymatic reactivity to DAB induced by neuronal inactivity

    Brain Res.

    (1978)
  • L.M. Aitkin et al.

    Central neural mechanisms of hearing

  • M. Anniko et al.

    The effects of auditory deprivation on morphological maturation of the ventral cochlear nucleus

    Arch. Otolaryngol.

    (1989)
  • J.D. Bancroft et al.

    Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques

  • D.E. Born et al.

    Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Presynaptic action potentials regulate protein synthesis in nucleus magnocellularis neurons

    J. Neurosci.

    (1988)
  • N.B. Cant et al.

    The structural basis for stimulus coding in the cochlear nucleus of the cat

  • C.H. Chouard et al.

    The effect of the acoustic nerve chronic electric stimulation upon the guinea pig cochlear nucleus development

    Acta Otolaryngol.

    (1983)
  • G.M. Clark et al.

    The University of Melbourne — Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant

  • B.M. Clopton

    Neurophysiology of auditory deprivation

  • J. Coleman

    Effects of acoustic deprivation on morphological parameters of development of auditory neurons in rat

  • J.G. Hall

    Pathological changes in second-order auditory neurones after noise exposure and after peripheral denervation

    Scand. Audiol.

    (1975)
  • R. Hartmann et al.

    Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibres to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation

    Acta. Otolaryngol. Suppl.

    (1990)
  • G.T. Hashisaki et al.

    Effects of unilateral cochlea removal on anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons in developing gerbils

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1989)
  • G.E. Hyde et al.

    Cytochrome oxidase response to cochlea removal in chicken auditory brainstem neurons

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Validation of the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire in cochlear implanted infants and toddlers

      2017, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Neurological investigations demonstrate that early cochlear implantation minimizes auditory deprivation in children with profound deafness [1,38,39]. In animals, physiological and neurological studies examining the effects of poor or no stimulation of the auditory system on cortical plasticity support the “earlier is better” argument [40–43]. On this evidence, we expected to see differences in auditory development between children implanted before and after 12 months of age – and this was confirmed.

    • Higher-order auditory areas in congenital deafness: Top-down interactions and corticocortical decoupling

      2017, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In these animals early chronic electrostimulation with cochlear implants reversed most of the deficits observed in deaf animals (reviewed in Kral et al., 2006), demonstrating that the absence of hearing experience was the cause of the deficits in this animal model. Pharmacologically deafened cats before onset of hearing (neonatally deafened animals, Matsushima et al., 1991; Snyder et al., 1990). Also in these animals early chronic electrostimulation has provided evidence of reversibility of the deafness-induced deficits (Fallon et al., 2009b; Fallon et al., 2014; Leake et al., 1992; Snyder et al., 1990, 1991).

    • Cochlear implantation under the first year of age-The outcomes. A critical systematic review and meta-analysis

      2010, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, Ryugo et al. reported that successful restoration of the abnormal synaptic structures in the auditory nerve endings of deaf cats to a normal state is feasible after continuous stimulation of their auditory nerves with a six-channel cochlear implant for 3 months [15]. Nevertheless, electrical stimulation of the inner ear is more effective in younger animals compared to older ones in eliciting gene expression that is associated with the development of a functional network in the auditory pathways [16–18]. The above experiments support the notion that critical periods exist for the preservation or restoration of the auditory system in profoundly deaf children [19].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text