Bias in measurement of fission-track length distributions

https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-245X(82)90031-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Problems in the measurement of fission-track length distributions include biases in various methods of sampling and the amount of information about the true lenght distribution that can be recovered. It is concluded that all length measurements are biased and that this bias must be corrected before meaningful geological interpretations can be made. It is recommended that track-length measurements in minerals be restricted to horizontal confined fission tracks, because the length bias is then simple and easy to correct. Projected track-length measurements are not recommended because of complicated bias and insensitivity to important features of the true length distribution. These points are illustrated by length measurements on two Australian apatite samples.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (231)

  • Thermal fluid activities along the Mozumi-Sukenobu fault, central Japan, identified via zircon fission-track thermochronometry

    2019, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences: X
    Citation Excerpt :

    Spontaneous tracks were counted under an optical microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE E600; 100× dry objective lens and 10× ocular lens). Horizontal confined track (HCT; Laslett et al., 1982) lengths were measured using optical microscopy and image processing software (Image-Pro Plus). HCTs were used for length measurements when etched properly having widths of 1.0 ± 0.5 μm (Yamada et al, 1993).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text