Chapter 5 - Fluorescent Protein Applications in Microscopy

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407761-4.00005-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The use of fluorescent proteins (FPs) in modern cell biology and microscopy has had an extraordinary impact on our ability to investigate dynamic processes in living cells. FPs are unique in that fluorescence is encoded solely by the primary amino acid sequence of the FP and does not require enzymatic modification or cofactors. This genetically encoded fluorescence enables the expression of FPs in diverse cells and organisms and the detection of that fluorescence in living systems. This chapter focuses on microscopy-based applications of FP detection to monitor protein localization, dynamics, interaction, and the cellular environment.

Section snippets

The Identification of Green Fluorescent Protein

The isolation of green fluorescent protein (GFP) was first described by Shimomura, Johnson, & Saiga, 1962 as a footnote to their studies about the aequorin protein from the jellyfish Aequorea aequorea. A. aequorea normally emits a greenish luminescence from the light organs around the rim of the jellyfish. During the isolation of the luminescence system of Aequorea, Shimomura and colleagues noted that the luminescence from aequorin was blue rather than the green luminescence of the intact

Formation of the GFP Chromophore

The primary amino acid sequence of GFP is sufficient to direct the formation of the functional chromophore. Heim, Prasher & Tsien, 1994 first proposed a reaction scheme to explain how GFP might spontaneously mature into a fluorescent protein (FP; Fig. 5.2). Four key steps were proposed to control chromophore formation: (1) the folding of the GFP protein, (2) the cyclization and dehydration of the peptide backbone between the amide nitrogen of Gly67 and the carbonyl of Ser65, (3) the oxidation

The Structure of GFP

The crystal structure of GFP revealed the importance of the entire GFP protein to the fluorescence of the chromophore. GFP is formed by an 11-stranded β-barrel that folds into a structure that has been termed as β-can (Fig. 5.3; Ormo et al., 1996, Yang et al., 1996). The chromophore is completely buried in the center of the β-can structure, protected from solvent quenching effects. Folding of the GFP protein into the β-can structure prevents access of other proteins to the chromophore region;

Mutagenesis to Alter the Properties of GFP

The thermosensitivity, slow maturation rate, and complex absorbance spectrum of Aequorea GFP were some of the factors that prompted multiple research groups to begin mutagenizing GFP to alter its functional properties. Initial mutagenesis studies on GFP were directed at improving its folding and expression at 37 °C and at altering its excitation and emission spectrum (Cormack et al., 1996, Crameri et al., 1996, Delagrave et al., 1995, Heim et al., 1995, Heim et al., 1994, Siemering et al., 1996

Imaging FPs

There are several simple factors to consider and control when planning an imaging experiment that will dramatically improve the ability to detect FPs in fixed or live specimens. Most of these factors are just as applicable to imaging conventional fluorophores as they are to FPs and thus can be considered as general guidelines for fluorescence imaging. The challenge with any live cell experiment is to image the specimen over a long enough time frame to extract meaningful data. This is almost

Applications of FP Imaging

The development of FP variants that possess diverse properties such as spectral differences, sensitivity to environmental factors, and photoswitchable responses to light has opened many new avenues in live cell imaging. Here, we discuss a few examples of microscopy-based FP applications to investigate cell biological questions.

Conclusion

The examples described earlier represent just a few of the many applications of FP imaging used to understand the dynamics of proteins in cells and to monitor the intercellular environment. Additional applications whose descriptions are outside the scope of this chapter include FP-based sensors of cell cycle state (Sakaue-Sawano et al., 2008), optical control of protein activity (Zhou, Chung, Lam & Lin, 2012), all-optical writing with a photoswitchable GFP (Grotjohann et al., 2011), and many

References (90)

  • D.W. Piston et al.

    Fluorescent protein FRET: The good, the bad and the ugly

    Trends in Biochemical Sciences

    (2007)
  • D.C. Prasher et al.

    Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein

    Gene

    (1992)
  • S.J. Remington

    Fluorescent proteins: Maturation, photochemistry and photophysics

    Current Opinion in Structural Biology

    (2006)
  • A. Sakaue-Sawano et al.

    Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression

    Cell

    (2008)
  • S.S. Shekhawat et al.

    Split-protein systems: Beyond binary protein–protein interactions

    Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

    (2011)
  • O. Shimomura

    Structure of the chromophore of Aequorea green fluorescent protein

    FEBS Letters

    (1979)
  • K.R. Siemering et al.

    Mutations that suppress the thermosensitivity of green fluorescent protein

    Current Biology

    (1996)
  • D.S. Wang et al.

    The pleckstrin homology domain of human beta I sigma II spectrin is targeted to the plasma membrane in vivo

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

    (1996)
  • R. Ando et al.

    An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2002)
  • R. Ando et al.

    Regulated fast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling observed by reversible protein highlighting

    Science

    (2004)
  • G.S. Baird et al.

    Biochemistry, mutagenesis, and oligomerization of DsRed, a red fluorescent protein from coral

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2000)
  • E. Betzig et al.

    Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution

    Science

    (2006)
  • B.J. Bevis et al.

    Rapidly maturing variants of the Discosoma red fluorescent protein (DsRed)

    Nature Biotechnology

    (2002)
  • B.D. Blakeley et al.

    Split-superpositive GFP reassembly is a fast, efficient, and robust method for detecting protein–protein interactions in vivo

    Molecular BioSystems

    (2012)
  • R. Brock et al.

    Comparison of fixation protocols for adherent cultured cells applied to a GFP fusion protein of the epidermal growth factor receptor

    Cytometry

    (1999)
  • R.E. Campbell et al.

    A monomeric red fluorescent protein

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2002)
  • M. Chalfie et al.

    Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression

    Science

    (1994)
  • H. Chang et al.

    A unique series of reversibly switchable fluorescent proteins with beneficial properties for various applications

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2012)
  • D.M. Chudakov et al.

    Kindling fluorescent proteins for precise in vivo photolabeling

    Nature Biotechnology

    (2003)
  • D.M. Chudakov et al.

    Fluorescent proteins and their applications in imaging living cells and tissues

    Physiological Reviews

    (2010)
  • D.M. Chudakov et al.

    Photoswitchable cyan fluorescent protein for protein tracking

    Nature Biotechnology

    (2004)
  • W. Chun et al.

    Split GFP complementation assay for quantitative measurement of tau aggregation in situ

    Methods in Molecular Biology

    (2010)
  • C.W. Cody et al.

    Chemical structure of the hexapeptide chromophore of the Aequorea green-fluorescent protein

    Biochemistry

    (1993)
  • A. Crameri et al.

    Improved green fluorescent protein by molecular evolution using DNA shuffling

    Nature Biotechnology

    (1996)
  • M.W. Davidson et al.

    Engineered fluorescent proteins: Innovations and applications

    Nature Methods

    (2009)
  • R.N. Day et al.

    The fluorescent protein palette: Tools for cellular imaging

    Chemical Society Reviews

    (2009)
  • S. Delagrave et al.

    Red-shifted excitation mutants of the green fluorescent protein

    Biotechnology (NY)

    (1995)
  • Domin, A., Lan, M. J., & Kaminski, C. (2004). Effects of fixation on cyan fluorescent protein and its fluorescence...
  • M. Fehr et al.

    Development and use of fluorescent nanosensors for metabolite imaging in living cells

    Biochemical Society Transactions

    (2005)
  • W.B. Frommer et al.

    Genetically encoded biosensors based on engineered fluorescent proteins

    Chemical Society Reviews

    (2009)
  • T.J. Gould et al.

    Imaging biological structures with fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy

    Nature Protocols

    (2009)
  • L.A. Gross et al.

    The structure of the chromophore within DsRed, a red fluorescent protein from coral

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2000)
  • T. Grotjohann et al.

    Diffraction-unlimited all-optical imaging and writing with a photochromic GFP

    Nature

    (2011)
  • N.G. Gurskaya et al.

    Engineering of a monomeric green-to-red photoactivatable fluorescent protein induced by blue light

    Nature Biotechnology

    (2006)
  • J.W. Hastings et al.

    Comparative biochemistry of calcium-activated photoproteins from the Ctenophore, Mnemiopsis and the coelenterates Aequorea, Obelia, Pelagia and Renilla

    The Biological Bulletin

    (1969)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Light-Emitting Probes for Labeling Peptides

      2020, Cell Reports Physical Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other self-labeling fluorescent proteins (FPs), such as SNAP-tag and HaloTag, can be conjugated to peptides or proteins to investigate how they associate with cell membranes, or can even be directly coupled to living cells.23,24 However, wild-type FPs are usually found in their oligomeric form, showing higher toxicity and decreased ability to interact with their target biomolecules (e.g., proteins, peptides), leading to mistargeting and lower selective binding, thus requiring artificial monomerization, and consequent loss of brightness and stability.23 Moreover, FPs are large and hydrophobic (Figure 3), and when they are incorporated into small target molecules such as peptides, they can cause undesirable aggregation and changes in physicochemical properties and biological activity.25,26

    • Live visualization and quantification of pathway signaling with dual fluorescent and bioluminescent reporters

      2014, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, both immune-based and biochemical assays typically use cell lysates, thus limiting their capability to study the dynamics of signal transduction in living cells [10]. High-throughput, image-based cell assays have emerged as alternative approach for monitoring molecular events [11–13]. For example, signaling molecule such as NF-κB can be fused with imageable reporters such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) or red fluorescent protein (RFP).

    • Determining absolute protein numbers by quantitative fluorescence microscopy

      2014, Methods in Cell Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This can be most easily achieved using a genetically encoded fluorophore that is both bright and stable (Douglass & Vale, 2008; Johnson & Straight, 2013; Xia, Li, & Fang, 2013). Imaging parameters should minimize sample photobleaching, and all methods discussed are very sensitive to loss of signal intensity due to unintended photobleaching during image acquisition (Coffman & Wu, 2012; Johnson & Straight, 2013). The detailed protocol that follows includes specific guidelines for optimization of image acquisition.

    View full text