Chapter 16 - Cochlear implants

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-5310-8.00016-8Get rights and content

Introduction

Prior to the late 1970s there was no therapeutic intervention for patients with a severe-profound, bilateral, sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Because of the extensive loss of the sensory hair cells, these patients did not receive clinical benefit from conventional hearing aids. It is only over the last four decades through the development of cochlear implants (CIs) and auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) that patients with an extensive SNHL have been able to receive useful clinical benefit. CIs have an electrode array that is inserted into the scala tympani to electrically stimulate discrete sectors of auditory nerve thereby taking advantage of the tonotopic organization of the cochlea. CIs transmit important speech cues to the auditory brain, including loudness (stimulus intensity); pitch (site of cochlear stimulation); and temporal cues that convey information about the dynamics of the speech envelope.

Originally these devices were designed as an “aid to lip-reading”; however, with improved technology and habilitation techniques CIs have proven to be very successful, with some patients being able to communicate in an almost normal fashion. By 2011, a total of 200,000 CIs had been implanted worldwide. As clinical performance has improved, patient selection criteria have expanded to include children as young as 6 months of age, and severely deaf patients who receive only limited benefit from conventional amplification. This chapter will review the pathophysiology of a severe-profound SNHL, present an overview of contemporary CIs, briefly review central auditory prostheses and discuss new developments associated with CI technology.

Section snippets

Sensorineural hearing loss

Hearing loss is a major health and economic burden on society. For example, it is estimated that 22% of Europeans are affected by a hearing loss, costing the community €284 billion annually (http://www.hear-it.org/multimedia/Hear_It_Report_October_2006.pdf). Hearing impairment can result in significant communication disorders including poor development of spoken and written language in children, leading to important educational, social and vocational ramifications that can adversely affect

Cochlear implants

The development of CIs has dramatically changed the clinical management of patients with a profound, bilateral SNHL. CIs electrically stimulate discrete populations of residual SGNs via an electrode array located in the scala tympani, thereby taking advantage of the known tonotopic organization of the cochlea by dividing speech into discrete frequency bands mapped to specific electrodes.

Central auditory prostheses

Although cochlear implants have clearly demonstrated clinical benefit for severe–profoundly deaf patients (Bond et al., 2009), there have been numerous attempts to develop auditory prostheses based on electrical stimulation of the central auditory pathway. Studies of the mammalian auditory pathway have demonstrated well organized cochleotopic maps within the major auditory nuclei from the cochlear nucleus to the auditory cortex (Irvine, 1992), implying that appropriately positioned electrode

Future directions

There are a number of active areas of research directed towards improving the clinical performance of CI users. This research covers a wide spectrum of hearing ability ranging from patients with a profound SNHL to those with useful levels of acoustic hearing and includes: combined electric/acoustic stimulation (Gantz et al., 2000, Von Ilberg et al., 2011); bilateral cochlear implantation for improved sound localization and speech perception in noise (Van Hoesel and Tyler, 2003, Litovsky, 2011);

Conclusions

This chapter reviews the biological basis of CIs and provides an overview of both existing technologies and future research that will impact on the field. CIs have made a major impact on the quality of life of severe-profoundly deaf adults and children. With this clinical success come even broader patient selection criteria both in terms of age at implantation and hearing ability. The broadening of selection criteria will influence CI research in the future, including the development of

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank their colleagues within the Bionics Institute for useful discussions on aspects of this work.

We gratefully acknowledge the following financial contributions to this work: National Institutes of Health (HHS-N-263-2007-00053-C), the Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation, and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. The Bionics Institute also acknowledges the support it receives from the Victorian Government through its

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (174)

  • R.N. Abi-Hachem et al.

    The injured cochlea as a target for inflammatory processes, initiation of cell death pathways and application of related otoprotectives strategies

    Rec. Pat. CNS Drug Discov.

    (2010)
  • N.J. Adamo et al.

    Ultrastructural features of neurons and nerve fibres in the spiral ganglia of cats

    J. Neurocytol.

    (1973)
  • M.J. Agterberg et al.

    Morphological changes in spiral ganglion cells after intracochlear application of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in deafened guinea pigs

    Hear. Res.

    (2008)
  • W. Arnold

    Myelination of the human spiral ganglion

    Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl.

    (1987)
  • W. Arnold et al.

    The spiral ganglion of the rhesus monkey

    Laryngol. Rhinol. Otol. (Stuttg.)

    (1983)
  • J.A. Bierer et al.

    Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus

    Hear. Res.

    (2010)
  • R.C. Black et al.

    Current distribution measurements within the human cochlea

    IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.

    (1981)
  • P. Blamey

    Are spiral ganglion cell numbers important for speech perception with a cochlear implant?

    Am. J. Otol.

    (1997)
  • P. Blamey et al.

    Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants

    Audiol. Neurootol.

    (1996)
  • M. Bond et al.

    The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model

    Hlth Technol. Assess.

    (2009)
  • R.J. Briggs et al.

    Initial clinical experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant research device

    Otol. Neurotol.

    (2008)
  • M.C. Brown

    Morphology of labeled afferent fibers in the guinea pig cochlea

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1987)
  • J.M. Cayce et al.

    Pulsed infrared light alters neural activity in rat somatosensory cortex in vivo

    Neuroimage

    (2011)
  • S.F. Cogan

    Neural stimulation and recording electrodes

    Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.

    (2008)
  • V. Colletti et al.

    Progress in restoration of hearing with the auditory brainstem implant

    Prog. Brain Res.

    (2009)
  • R.L. Coste et al.

    Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. III. Pulse polarity

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1996)
  • H. Davis

    Commentry on “A prosthesis for the deaf based on cortical stimulation”

    Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.

    (1973)
  • S.J. Dettman et al.

    Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits

    Ear Hear.

    (2007)
  • A. Djourno et al.

    Prothèse auditive par excitation électrique à distance du nerf sensoriel à l'aide d'un bobinage inclus à demeure

    Presse Méd.

    (1957)
  • W.H. Dobelle et al.

    A prosthesis for the deaf based on cortical stimulation

    Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.

    (1973)
  • R.C. Dowell et al.

    Speech perception in children using cochlear implants: prediction of long-term outcomes

    Cochl. Implants Int.

    (2002)
  • A.R. Duke et al.

    Combined optical and electrical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2009)
  • D. Durham et al.

    Altered malate dehydrogenase activity in nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken following cochlea removal

    Hear. Res.

    (1993)
  • H. Eastwood et al.

    Round window delivery of dexamethasone ameliorates local and remote hearing loss produced by cochlear implantation into the second turn of the guinea pig cochlea

    Hear. Res.

    (2010)
  • G. Ehret

    Quantitative analysis of nerve fibre densities in the cochlea of the house mouse (Mus musculus)

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1979)
  • H.H. Elverland et al.

    Hereditary deafness in the cat. An electron microscopic study of the spiral ganglion

    Acta Otolaryngol.

    (1980)
  • P. Ernfors et al.

    Complementary roles of BDNF and NT-3 in vestibular and auditory development

    Neuron

    (1995)
  • J.B. Fallon et al.

    Cochlear implants and brain plasticity

    Hear. Res.

    (2008)
  • J.B. Fallon et al.

    Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (2009)
  • E. Felder et al.

    Quantitative evaluation of myelinated nerve fibres and hair cells in cochleae of humans with age-related high-tone hearing loss

    Hear. Res.

    (1995)
  • H. Felix

    Anatomical differences in the peripheral auditory system of mammals and man. A mini review

    Adv. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2002)
  • H. Felix et al.

    Degeneration pattern of human first-order cochlear neurons

    Adv. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2002)
  • B. Fritzsch et al.

    Nerve dependency of developing and mature sensory receptor cells

    Ann. NY Acad. Sci.

    (1998)
  • B.J. Gantz et al.

    Long-term results of cochlear implants in children with residual hearing

    Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl.

    (2000)
  • L.N. Gillespie et al.

    Delayed neurotrophin treatment supports auditory neuron survival in deaf guinea pigs

    NeuroReport

    (2004)
  • R.D. Ginzberg et al.

    A study of cochlear innervation in the young cat with the Golgi method

    Hear. Res.

    (1983)
  • R.D. Ginzberg et al.

    Fine structure of cochlear innervation in the cat

    Hear. Res.

    (1984)
  • N.A. Hardie et al.

    Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem

    Hear. Res.

    (1999)
  • R. Hartmann et al.

    Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea

    Hear. Res.

    (1984)
  • S. Heid et al.

    A model for prelingual deafness, the congenitally deaf white cat – population statistics and degenerative changes

    Hear. Res.

    (1998)
  • R. Hinojosa et al.

    Histopathology of profound sensorineural deafness

    Ann. NY Acad. Sci.

    (1983)
  • C.Q. Huang et al.

    Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: direct current measurement in vivo

    IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.

    (1999)
  • C.Q. Huang et al.

    Stimulus induced pH changes in cochlear implants: an in vitro and in vivo study

    Ann. Biomed. Eng.

    (2001)
  • D.R.F. Irvine

    Physiology of auditory brainstem

  • A.D. Izzo et al.

    Selectivity of neural stimulation in the auditory system: a comparison of optic and electric stimuli

    J. Biomed. Opt.

    (2007)
  • E. Javel et al.

    Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure

    Hear. Res.

    (2000)
  • L.G. Johnsson

    Sequence of degeneration of Corti's organ and its first-order neurons

    Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.

    (1974)
  • C. Jolly et al.

    Electrode features for hearing preservation and drug delivery strategies

    Adv. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2010)
  • A.M. Khan et al.

    Effect of cochlear implantation on residual spiral ganglion cell count as determined by comparison with the contralateral nonimplanted inner ear in humans

    Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.

    (2005)
  • R.S. Kimura et al.

    Nerve fiber synapses on spiral ganglion cells in the human cochlea

    Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl.

    (1979)
  • Cited by (4)

    • Neuroprostheses for restoring hearing loss

      2015, Implantable Neuroprostheses for Restoring Function
    • Auditory and Visual Neural Prostheses

      2016, Neurobionics: The Biomedical Engineering of Neural Prostheses
    View full text