Elsevier

Acta Materialia

Volume 55, Issue 12, July 2007, Pages 4041-4065
Acta Materialia

Overview No. 143
Toward a quantitative understanding of mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline metals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.038Get rights and content

Abstract

Focusing on nanocrystalline (nc) pure face-centered cubic metals, where systematic experimental data are available, this paper presents a brief overview of the recent progress made in improving mechanical properties of nc materials, and in quantitatively and mechanistically understanding the underlying mechanisms. The mechanical properties reviewed include strength, ductility, strain rate and temperature dependence, fatigue and tribological properties. The highlighted examples include recent experimental studies in obtaining both high strength and considerable ductility, the compromise between enhanced fatigue limit and reduced crack growth resistance, the stress-assisted dynamic grain growth during deformation, and the relation between rate sensitivity and possible deformation mechanisms. The recent advances in obtaining quantitative and mechanics-based models, developed in line with the related transmission electron microscopy and relevant molecular dynamics observations, are discussed with particular attention to mechanistic models of partial/perfect-dislocation or deformation-twin-mediated deformation processes interacting with grain boundaries, constitutive modeling and simulations of grain size distribution and dynamic grain growth, and physically motivated crystal plasticity modeling of pure Cu with nanoscale growth twins. Sustained research efforts have established a group of nanocrystalline and nanostructured metals that exhibit a combination of high strength and considerable ductility in tension. Accompanying the gradually deepening understanding of the deformation mechanisms and their relative importance, quantitative and mechanisms-based constitutive models that can realistically capture experimentally measured and grain-size-dependent stress–strain behavior, strain-rate sensitivity and even ductility limit are becoming available. Some outstanding issues and future opportunities are listed and discussed.

Introduction

In the mid-1980s, Gleiter [1] made the visionary argument that metals and alloys, if made nanocrystalline, would have a number of appealing mechanical characteristics of potential significance for structural applications. This followed, quite plausibly, from what was known about the extraordinary strength of alloys such as highly cold drawn wires characterized by structural length scales of nanometer size (e.g. [2]). Compared with conventional coarser grained materials, the benefits that may be derived from nanostructuring include ultrahigh yield and fracture strengths, superior wear resistance, and possibly superplastic formability at low temperatures and/or high strain rates. The deformation mechanisms are also predicted to be radically different, as plasticity at the nanoscale may be mediated mostly by grain-boundary deformation processes. These provocative thoughts stimulated widespread interest in the mechanical properties and novel deformation mechanisms of nanostructured materials over the past two decades. Many research articles have been published in this area. Unfortunately, most of the experimental findings documented in this literature up to the late 1990s were not representative of intrinsic material response, due to the problems and difficulties associated with preparing full-density and flaw-free nanocrystalline samples [3]. Improvements in materials processing, discussed briefly herein, have led to enhancements in properties, but yet still further refinements are needed.

Strengthening with grain size refinement in metals and alloys with an average grain size of 100 nm or larger has been well characterized by the Hall–Petch (H–P) relationship, where dislocation pile-up against grain boundaries (GBs) along with other transgranular dislocation mechanisms are the dominant strength-controlling processes. When the average, and entire range of, grain sizes is reduced to less than 100 nm, the dislocation operation becomes increasingly more difficult and grain boundary-mediated processes become increasingly more important [3], [4], [5], [6].

With these observations in mind, we continue to use the terminology proposed in the earlier literature [3]: nanocrystalline (nc) materials are defined as those with their average and entire range of grain size typically finer than 100 nm; ultrafine crystalline (ufc) materials are defined as those with grain sizes on the order of 100 nm–1 μm; and microcrystalline (mc) materials are defined as those with average grain sizes greater than 1 μm [3], [4], [5], [7], [8], [9]. When one or more dimensions on average is smaller than 100 nm, the material is often termed a nanostructured (ns) material [7], [8], [10]. Another category may be termed nc/ufc metals, whose grain sizes are characterized by averages near 100 nm, but with grain size distributions spanning the range from nc to 500 nm. This class is included to highlight the fact that recent methods utilizing severe plastic deformation methods have produced high-density bulk Ti metal with grain sizes (d) in the range of 50 nm  d  150 nm.

A number of reviews have been written since Gleiter [1] first summarized the pioneering ideas, e.g. by Gleiter [11], [12], Weertman [13], Kumar et al. [3], Koch [4], Cheng et al. [14], Wolf et al. [15], Meyers et al. [9], Ma [10], etc. Specific references to these are made throughout the text.

This overview highlights some of the most recent experimental advances in property improvements and mechanisms-based quantitative analyses, rather than attempting to provide a detailed account for all developments in this field. Recent experimental studies, discussed herein, on the one hand point out promising routes to optimize mechanical properties, yet on the other hand reveal challenges to the understanding of intrinsic nc behavior that require further careful quantitative examination. Examples of such effects or phenomena include grain size distribution vs. overall mechanical response and properties, the unusual size dependence of nanoscale growth twins in terms of ductility and the (apparent) stress-induced grain growth observed during deformation. All of these have significant effects on the macroscopic mechanical response and (therefore) implications for potential use of nc or even ufc metals and alloys. Parallel to these new developments in experimental investigations, several recent mechanisms based and physically motivated models have provided quantitative insights into the deformation mechanisms as well as possible routes to mechanical property improvements.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly highlights several of the most important and commonly used methods for processing bulk nc/ns materials. Severe plastic deformation is included in the discussion owing to the aforementioned ability to process nc/ufc metals. Although not intended as a comprehensive review of processing, this discussion provides needed perspective for our subsequent presentation of nc metal properties. Section 3 summarizes experimental observations on strength, ductility, strain rate and temperature dependence of strength, fatigue and tribological properties of nc materials. Here, along with the discussion of recently reported phenomenology, we note several key findings that challenge our understanding of nc metal behavior. Nanocrystalline grain size stability during deformation is one example of such critical behavior. Improvements in fatigue performance, including crack initiation vs. fatigue crack growth, are additional examples. Section 4 reviews recent developments in dislocation based and physically motivated continuum models. The modeling is discussed with an aim to quantitatively explore the critical phenomenology highlighted in Section 3. This focus explains the choice of our title. A summary and concluding remarks follow in Section 5.

Section snippets

Materials processing

In evaluating and optimizing the performance of an nc or ns metal, it is essential to control the defect content as well as the microstructure or perhaps more precisely the “nanostructure”. In particular, grain size distribution, the distribution of interface misorientation angles, residual stresses and internal strains are among the important structural features. In the past, the low Young’s modulus of nanostructured materials has been attributed to the unusual grain-boundary structures

Mechanical properties derived from nanostructuring

This section outlines the considerable progress made over the past several years, from the perspective of the control of macroscopic (continuum) “materials response”. The highlight is the improved and sometimes optimized mechanical properties achieved very recently by engineering the microstructure on the nanoscale in high-quality nc/ns metals. Behavior either newly contrasted against, or unusual relative to, coarser grained metals will be described. This is done for each of a comprehensive set

Nanocrystalline deformation mechanisms and mechanisms-based constitutive modeling

As pointed out above, an understanding of the deformation mechanisms is important for understanding, controlling and optimizing the mechanical properties of nc metals. A number of questions immediately come to mind when examining the properties achieved in nc metals. For example, why do we observe the extremely high strength and a H–P strengthening down to grain sizes on the order of 10 nm? The concept of dislocation-mediated deformation has been cited many times in Section 3 within the

Summary and concluding remarks

We have outlined recent progresses made in a number of areas related to the mechanical properties of nc/ns materials, including strength, ductility, strain rate and temperature dependence, fatigue and tribological properties, and related efforts to quantitatively and mechanistically understand the underlying deformation mechanisms. Our focus has been on pure fcc nc metals, where the most systematic experimental data are available. We have highlighted some of the most recent experimental results

Acknowledgments

M.D. acknowledges the financial support of the Defense University Research Initiative on Nano Technology (DURINT), which is funded at MIT by ONR under Grant N00014-01-1-0808. L.L. acknowledges National Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 50021101 and 50571096, and MOST of China (Grant No. 2005CB623604). R.J.A. is thankful to the National Science Foundation for support under the NIRT initiative. J.DeH. acknowledges support from the Netherlands Institute for Metals Research and the

References (209)

  • H. Gleiter

    Prog Mater Sci

    (1989)
  • H.J. Rack et al.

    Mat Sci Eng

    (1970)
  • K.S. Kumar et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2003)
  • C.C. Koch

    Scripta Mater

    (2003)
  • R.Z. Valiev et al.

    Prog Mater Sci

    (2000)
  • M.A. Meyers et al.

    Prog Mater Sci

    (2006)
  • H. Gleiter

    Acta Mater

    (2000)
  • S. Cheng et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2003)
  • D. Wolf et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2005)
  • V. Haas et al.

    Scripta Metall

    (1993)
  • P.G. Sanders et al.

    Nanostruct Mater

    (1997)
  • C. Suryanarayana

    Prog Mater Sci

    (2001)
  • D.B. Witkin et al.

    Prog Mater Sci

    (2006)
  • U. Erb

    Nanostruct Mater

    (1995)
  • K. Lu

    Mater Sci Eng R-Rep

    (1996)
  • C.C. Koch et al.

    Nanostruct Mater

    (1992)
  • I. Bakonyi et al.

    Surf Coat Technol

    (1996)
  • A.J. Detor et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2007)
  • K. Lu et al.

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2004)
  • N.R. Tao et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2002)
  • K. Wang et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2006)
  • U. Erb et al.

    Nanostruct Mater

    (1997)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2006)
  • P.G. Sanders et al.

    Acta Mater

    (1997)
  • G.T. Gray et al.

    Nanostruct Mater

    (1997)
  • E. Ma

    Scripta Mater

    (2003)
  • F. Ebrahimi et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (1998)
  • C.A. Schuh et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2003)
  • R. Suryanarayanan Iyer et al.

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (1999)
  • H.G. Jiang et al.

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2000)
  • S.R. Agnew et al.

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2000)
  • R.Z. Valiev et al.

    Acta Metall

    (1994)
  • H. Van Swygenhoven et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2001)
  • H. Conrad

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2003)
  • C.A. Schuh et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2002)
  • L. Lu et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2005)
  • Y.F. Shen et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2005)
  • M. Dao et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2006)
  • Y.F. Shen et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2006)
  • S.D. Dahlgren et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1977)
  • V.Y. Gertsman et al.

    Acta Metall

    (1994)
  • R.Z. Valiev

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (1997)
  • M. Jin et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2004)
  • W.A. Soer et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2004)
  • D.S. Gianola et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2006)
  • G.J. Fan et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2006)
  • B. Zhu et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2005)
  • B. Zhu et al.

    Acta Mater

    (2006)
  • Y.M. Wang et al.

    Scripta Mater

    (2003)
  • L. He et al.

    Nanostruct Mater

    (1996)
  • Cited by (1061)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text