Overview No. 143Toward a quantitative understanding of mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline metals
Introduction
In the mid-1980s, Gleiter [1] made the visionary argument that metals and alloys, if made nanocrystalline, would have a number of appealing mechanical characteristics of potential significance for structural applications. This followed, quite plausibly, from what was known about the extraordinary strength of alloys such as highly cold drawn wires characterized by structural length scales of nanometer size (e.g. [2]). Compared with conventional coarser grained materials, the benefits that may be derived from nanostructuring include ultrahigh yield and fracture strengths, superior wear resistance, and possibly superplastic formability at low temperatures and/or high strain rates. The deformation mechanisms are also predicted to be radically different, as plasticity at the nanoscale may be mediated mostly by grain-boundary deformation processes. These provocative thoughts stimulated widespread interest in the mechanical properties and novel deformation mechanisms of nanostructured materials over the past two decades. Many research articles have been published in this area. Unfortunately, most of the experimental findings documented in this literature up to the late 1990s were not representative of intrinsic material response, due to the problems and difficulties associated with preparing full-density and flaw-free nanocrystalline samples [3]. Improvements in materials processing, discussed briefly herein, have led to enhancements in properties, but yet still further refinements are needed.
Strengthening with grain size refinement in metals and alloys with an average grain size of 100 nm or larger has been well characterized by the Hall–Petch (H–P) relationship, where dislocation pile-up against grain boundaries (GBs) along with other transgranular dislocation mechanisms are the dominant strength-controlling processes. When the average, and entire range of, grain sizes is reduced to less than 100 nm, the dislocation operation becomes increasingly more difficult and grain boundary-mediated processes become increasingly more important [3], [4], [5], [6].
With these observations in mind, we continue to use the terminology proposed in the earlier literature [3]: nanocrystalline (nc) materials are defined as those with their average and entire range of grain size typically finer than 100 nm; ultrafine crystalline (ufc) materials are defined as those with grain sizes on the order of 100 nm–1 μm; and microcrystalline (mc) materials are defined as those with average grain sizes greater than 1 μm [3], [4], [5], [7], [8], [9]. When one or more dimensions on average is smaller than 100 nm, the material is often termed a nanostructured (ns) material [7], [8], [10]. Another category may be termed nc/ufc metals, whose grain sizes are characterized by averages near 100 nm, but with grain size distributions spanning the range from nc to 500 nm. This class is included to highlight the fact that recent methods utilizing severe plastic deformation methods have produced high-density bulk Ti metal with grain sizes (d) in the range of 50 nm ⩽ d ⩽ 150 nm.
A number of reviews have been written since Gleiter [1] first summarized the pioneering ideas, e.g. by Gleiter [11], [12], Weertman [13], Kumar et al. [3], Koch [4], Cheng et al. [14], Wolf et al. [15], Meyers et al. [9], Ma [10], etc. Specific references to these are made throughout the text.
This overview highlights some of the most recent experimental advances in property improvements and mechanisms-based quantitative analyses, rather than attempting to provide a detailed account for all developments in this field. Recent experimental studies, discussed herein, on the one hand point out promising routes to optimize mechanical properties, yet on the other hand reveal challenges to the understanding of intrinsic nc behavior that require further careful quantitative examination. Examples of such effects or phenomena include grain size distribution vs. overall mechanical response and properties, the unusual size dependence of nanoscale growth twins in terms of ductility and the (apparent) stress-induced grain growth observed during deformation. All of these have significant effects on the macroscopic mechanical response and (therefore) implications for potential use of nc or even ufc metals and alloys. Parallel to these new developments in experimental investigations, several recent mechanisms based and physically motivated models have provided quantitative insights into the deformation mechanisms as well as possible routes to mechanical property improvements.
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly highlights several of the most important and commonly used methods for processing bulk nc/ns materials. Severe plastic deformation is included in the discussion owing to the aforementioned ability to process nc/ufc metals. Although not intended as a comprehensive review of processing, this discussion provides needed perspective for our subsequent presentation of nc metal properties. Section 3 summarizes experimental observations on strength, ductility, strain rate and temperature dependence of strength, fatigue and tribological properties of nc materials. Here, along with the discussion of recently reported phenomenology, we note several key findings that challenge our understanding of nc metal behavior. Nanocrystalline grain size stability during deformation is one example of such critical behavior. Improvements in fatigue performance, including crack initiation vs. fatigue crack growth, are additional examples. Section 4 reviews recent developments in dislocation based and physically motivated continuum models. The modeling is discussed with an aim to quantitatively explore the critical phenomenology highlighted in Section 3. This focus explains the choice of our title. A summary and concluding remarks follow in Section 5.
Section snippets
Materials processing
In evaluating and optimizing the performance of an nc or ns metal, it is essential to control the defect content as well as the microstructure or perhaps more precisely the “nanostructure”. In particular, grain size distribution, the distribution of interface misorientation angles, residual stresses and internal strains are among the important structural features. In the past, the low Young’s modulus of nanostructured materials has been attributed to the unusual grain-boundary structures
Mechanical properties derived from nanostructuring
This section outlines the considerable progress made over the past several years, from the perspective of the control of macroscopic (continuum) “materials response”. The highlight is the improved and sometimes optimized mechanical properties achieved very recently by engineering the microstructure on the nanoscale in high-quality nc/ns metals. Behavior either newly contrasted against, or unusual relative to, coarser grained metals will be described. This is done for each of a comprehensive set
Nanocrystalline deformation mechanisms and mechanisms-based constitutive modeling
As pointed out above, an understanding of the deformation mechanisms is important for understanding, controlling and optimizing the mechanical properties of nc metals. A number of questions immediately come to mind when examining the properties achieved in nc metals. For example, why do we observe the extremely high strength and a H–P strengthening down to grain sizes on the order of 10 nm? The concept of dislocation-mediated deformation has been cited many times in Section 3 within the
Summary and concluding remarks
We have outlined recent progresses made in a number of areas related to the mechanical properties of nc/ns materials, including strength, ductility, strain rate and temperature dependence, fatigue and tribological properties, and related efforts to quantitatively and mechanistically understand the underlying deformation mechanisms. Our focus has been on pure fcc nc metals, where the most systematic experimental data are available. We have highlighted some of the most recent experimental results
Acknowledgments
M.D. acknowledges the financial support of the Defense University Research Initiative on Nano Technology (DURINT), which is funded at MIT by ONR under Grant N00014-01-1-0808. L.L. acknowledges National Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 50021101 and 50571096, and MOST of China (Grant No. 2005CB623604). R.J.A. is thankful to the National Science Foundation for support under the NIRT initiative. J.DeH. acknowledges support from the Netherlands Institute for Metals Research and the
References (209)
Prog Mater Sci
(1989)- et al.
Mat Sci Eng
(1970) - et al.
Acta Mater
(2003) Scripta Mater
(2003)- et al.
Prog Mater Sci
(2000) - et al.
Prog Mater Sci
(2006) Acta Mater
(2000)- et al.
Acta Mater
(2003) - et al.
Acta Mater
(2005) - et al.
Scripta Metall
(1993)
Nanostruct Mater
Prog Mater Sci
Prog Mater Sci
Nanostruct Mater
Mater Sci Eng R-Rep
Nanostruct Mater
Surf Coat Technol
Acta Mater
Mater Sci Eng A
Acta Mater
Acta Mater
Nanostruct Mater
Scripta Mater
Acta Mater
Nanostruct Mater
Scripta Mater
Scripta Mater
Acta Mater
Mater Sci Eng A
Mater Sci Eng A
Mater Sci Eng A
Acta Metall
Scripta Mater
Mater Sci Eng A
Scripta Mater
Acta Mater
Scripta Mater
Acta Mater
Scripta Mater
Thin Solid Films
Acta Metall
Mater Sci Eng A
Acta Mater
Acta Mater
Acta Mater
Scripta Mater
Acta Mater
Acta Mater
Scripta Mater
Nanostruct Mater
Cited by (1061)
Remarkable strengthening of nanolayered metallic composites by nanoscale crystalline interfacial layers
2024, Materials Today CommunicationsInterface-controlled mechanical properties and irradiation hardening in nanostructured Cr/Zr multilayers
2024, Journal of Nuclear MaterialsEffect of substrate bias on the formation of nanotwin and properties in Cu thin films for advanced packaging technology
2024, Surface and Coatings TechnologyA constitutive model of nanoporous NiTi shape memory alloys considering tensile-compressive asymmetry, grain size and porosity
2024, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics