The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.062Get rights and content

Abstract

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission will make the first global, space-based measurements of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) with the precision, resolution, and coverage needed to characterize CO2 sources and sinks on regional scales. The measurement approach and instrument specifications were determined through an analysis of existing carbon cycle data and a series of observing system simulation experiments. During its 2-year mission, OCO will fly in a 1:15 PM sun-synchronous orbit with a 16-day ground-track repeat time, just ahead of the EOS Aqua platform. It will carry a single instrument that incorporates three bore-sighted high-resolution spectrometers designed to measure reflected sunlight in the 0.76-μm O2 A-band and in the CO2 bands at 1.61 and 2.06 μm. Soundings recorded in these three bands will be used to retrieve the column-averaged CO2 dry air mole fraction (XCO2). A comprehensive validation program was included in the mission to ensure that the space-based XCO2 measurements have precisions of ∼0.3% (1 ppm) on regional scales. OCO measurements will be used in global synthesis inversion and data assimilation models to quantify CO2 sources and sinks. While OCO will have a nominal lifetime of only 2 years, it will serve as a pathfinder for future long-term CO2 monitoring missions.

Introduction

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an efficient greenhouse gas, whose atmospheric concentration has increased from 280 to 370 parts per million (ppm) since the beginning of the industrial age (Fig. 1(a); Cicerone et al., 2001). These rapid increases have raised concerns about global climate change. For more than 20 years, data collected from a global network of surface stations indicate only about half of the CO2 that has been emitted into the atmosphere by fossil fuel combustion and biomass burning has remained there (Fig. 1(b); cf. Schnell et al., 2001; Etheridge et al., 1996). The terrestrial biosphere and oceans have apparently absorbed the rest. The nature and geographic distribution of these CO2 sinks is not well understood. Specifically, while data from the Globalview-CO2 database (GV-CO2; cf. Gloor et al., 2000) provide compelling evidence for a Northern Hemisphere terrestrial carbon sink, this network is too sparse to resolve North American and Eurasian contributions to this sink, or to estimate fluxes over the southern oceans (Battle et al., 2000; Bousquet et al., 2000; Ciais et al., 1995; Conway and Tans, 1999; Denning et al., 1995; Keeling and Shertz, 1992; Morimoto et al., 2000; Pacala et al., 2001; Tans et al., 1989; Fan et al., 1998; Rayner and O'Brien, 2001; Enting, 1993). Existing measurements and models also cannot fully explain why the atmospheric CO2 increase has varied from 1 to 7 gigatons of carbon (GtC) per year in response to steadily rising fossil fuel emission rates (Fig. 1(b); Randerson et al., 1997, Randerson et al., 1999; Lee et al., 1998; Le Quéré et al., 2000; Keeling et al., 1995; Houghton, 2000; Frolking et al., 1996; Langenfelds et al., 2002). Because the present-day behavior of these CO2 sinks is not understood, predictions of their response to future climate or land use changes have large uncertainties. If their efficiency decreases over time, the atmospheric CO2 buildup could accelerate (Cox et al., 2000; Friedlingstein et al., 2001).

Global simulations with source–sink synthesis inversion models (Rayner and O'Brien, 2001) indicate that uncertainties in the atmospheric CO2 balance could be reduced substantially if data from the existing ground-based CO2 network were augmented by spatially resolved, global, measurements of the column-integrated dry air mole fraction (XCO2) with precisions of ∼1 ppm (0.3% of 370 ppm). This information would also facilitate monitoring compliance with future CO2 emissions treaties that offer credits for CO2 sequestration as well as emissions reductions. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) has been designed to provide these measurements.

Section snippets

Measurement approach

Synthesis inversion models infer the flux of CO2 between the surface and atmosphere from measured spatial and temporal gradients in the atmospheric CO2 concentration. Because these gradients are usually small (<1 ppm) on regional scales (8° × 10°), XCO2 measurements must have high precision and no significant geographically varying bias at regional to continental scales. To meet these stringent requirements, the OCO measurement requirements were derived from end-to-end observation system

Instrumentation

The OCO instrument incorporates independent bore-sighted, long-slit, imaging grating spectrometers for the 1.61- and 2.06-μm CO2 bands and the 0.76-μm O2 A-band. These three spectrometers are integrated into a common structure to improve rigidity and thermal stability (Fig. 6). All three spectrometers use similar optical designs, consisting of an optimized 100 mm diameter, f/2 telescope that focuses light on a long, narrow slit that is aligned perpendicular to the orbit track. Behind the slit,

Spacecraft

OCO will use a 3-axis stabilized spacecraft based on the Orbital LEOStar-2 bus (Fig. 3(a)). This bus was used previously for OrbView-4 (OV-4), Galaxy Explorer (GALEX), and Solar Radiation and Climate Explorer (SORCE). For OCO, the bus will be used to point the instrument to nadir, glint, specific ground targets, or the limb, or to orient the calibration target toward the sun. It will also be used to point the body-mounted X-band antenna at the ground station twice each day. The spacecraft

Conclusions

OCO will provide the first global, space-based observations of CO2 with the spatial and temporal resolutions and accuracy needed to characterize sources and sinks of this important greenhouse gas. These space-based measurements will provide the greatest benefit in regions that are poorly sampled by existing ground-based CO2 monitoring networks, but their high spatial density may also contribute to carbon cycle process studies, like those being planned as part of the North American Carbon

Acknowledgements

Part of this work was performed for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory of the California Institute of Technology under contract to NASA. Significant contributions were made by Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (a United Technologies Company) and Orbital Sciences Corporation.

References (45)

  • V.M Devi et al.

    Absolute rovibrational intensities on 12C16O absorption bands in the 3090–3850 cm−1 spectral region

    J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer

    (1998)
  • D.W.T Griffith et al.

    Surface fluxes of CO2, CH4, and N2O at OASIS'95 using tower-based FTIR techniques

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2002)
  • D Baldocchi et al.

    FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities

    Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc.

    (2001)
  • M Battle et al.

    Global carbon sinks and their variability inferred from atmospheric O2 and δ13C

    Science

    (2000)
  • C.D Benner et al.

    A multispectrum nonlinear least-squares fitting technique

    J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer

    (1995)
  • M Birk et al.

    Determination of line strengths by Fourier-transform spectroscopy

    Appl. Opt.

    (1996)
  • P Bousquet et al.

    Regional changes in carbon dioxide fluxes of land and oceans since 1980

    Science

    (2000)
  • W.W Chou et al.

    Net fluxes of CO2 in Amazonia derived from aircraft observations

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2002)
  • P Ciais et al.

    A large northern-hemisphere terrestrial CO2 sink indicated by the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2

    Science

    (1995)
  • R.J Cicerone et al.

    Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions

    (2001)
  • T.J Conway et al.

    Evidence for interannual variability of the carbon cycle from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory global air sampling network

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (1994)
  • T.J Conway et al.

    Development of the CO2 latitude gradient in recent decades

    Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle

    (1999)
  • P.M Cox et al.

    Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model

    Nature

    (2000)
  • D Crisp

    Absorption of sunlight by water vapor in cloudy conditions: a partial explanation for the cloud absorption anomaly

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (1997)
  • A.S Denning et al.

    Latitudinal gradient of atmospheric CO2 due to seasonal exchange with land biota

    Nature

    (1995)
  • I.G Enting

    Inverse problems in atmospheric constituent studies. 3. Estimating errors in surface sources

    Inverse Probl.

    (1993)
  • D.M Etheridge et al.

    Natural and anthropogenic changes in atmospheric CO2 over the last 1000 years from air in Antarctic ice and firn

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1996)
  • S Fan et al.

    A large terrestrial carbon sink in North America implied by atmospheric and oceanic carbon dioxide data and models

    Science

    (1998)
  • P Friedlingstein et al.

    Positive feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2001)
  • S Frolking et al.

    Modeling temporal variability in the carbon balance of a spruce/moss boreal forest

    Global Change Biol.

    (1996)
  • M Gloor et al.

    Optimal sampling of the atmosphere for purpose of inverse modeling: a model study

    Global Biogeochem. Cycle

    (2000)
  • A.K Heidinger et al.

    Molecular line absorption in a scattering atmosphere. Part II: application to remote sensing in the O2 A-band

    J. Atmos. Sci.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text