Elsevier

Biotechnology Advances

Volume 25, Issue 3, May–June 2007, Pages 294-306
Biotechnology Advances

Research review paper
Biodiesel from microalgae

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Continued use of petroleum sourced fuels is now widely recognized as unsustainable because of depleting supplies and the contribution of these fuels to the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the environment. Renewable, carbon neutral, transport fuels are necessary for environmental and economic sustainability. Biodiesel derived from oil crops is a potential renewable and carbon neutral alternative to petroleum fuels. Unfortunately, biodiesel from oil crops, waste cooking oil and animal fat cannot realistically satisfy even a small fraction of the existing demand for transport fuels. As demonstrated here, microalgae appear to be the only source of renewable biodiesel that is capable of meeting the global demand for transport fuels. Like plants, microalgae use sunlight to produce oils but they do so more efficiently than crop plants. Oil productivity of many microalgae greatly exceeds the oil productivity of the best producing oil crops. Approaches for making microalgal biodiesel economically competitive with petrodiesel are discussed.

Introduction

Microalgae are sunlight-driven cell factories that convert carbon dioxide to potential biofuels, foods, feeds and high-value bioactives (Metting and Pyne, 1986, Schwartz, 1990, Kay, 1991, Shimizu, 1996, Shimizu, 2003, Borowitzka, 1999, Ghirardi et al., 2000, Akkerman et al., 2002, Banerjee et al., 2002, Melis, 2002, Lorenz and Cysewski, 2003, Metzger and Largeau, 2005, Singh et al., 2005, Spolaore et al., 2006, Walter et al., 2005). In addition, these photosynthetic microorganisms are useful in bioremediation applications (Mallick, 2002, Suresh and Ravishankar, 2004, Kalin et al., 2005, Munoz and Guieysse, 2006) and as nitrogen fixing biofertilizers Vaishampayan et al., 2001). This article focuses on microalgae as a potential source of biodiesel.

Microalgae can provide several different types of renewable biofuels. These include methane produced by anaerobic digestion of the algal biomass (Spolaore et al., 2006); biodiesel derived from microalgal oil (Roessler et al., 1994, Sawayama et al., 1995, Dunahay et al., 1996, Sheehan et al., 1998, Banerjee et al., 2002, Gavrilescu and Chisti, 2005); and photobiologically produced biohydrogen (Ghirardi et al., 2000, Akkerman et al., 2002, Melis, 2002, Fedorov et al., 2005, Kapdan and Kargi, 2006). The idea of using microalgae as a source of fuel is not new (Chisti, 1980–81, Nagle and Lemke, 1990, Sawayama et al., 1995), but it is now being taken seriously because of the escalating price of petroleum and, more significantly, the emerging concern about global warming that is associated with burning fossil fuels (Gavrilescu and Chisti, 2005).

Biodiesel is produced currently from plant and animal oils, but not from microalgae. This is likely to change as several companies are attempting to commercialize microalgal biodiesel. Biodiesel is a proven fuel. Technology for producing and using biodiesel has been known for more than 50 years (Knothe et al., 1997, Fukuda et al., 2001, Barnwal and Sharma, 2005, Demirbas, 2005, Van Gerpen, 2005, Felizardo et al., 2006, Kulkarni and Dalai, 2006, Meher et al., 2006). In the United States, biodiesel is produced mainly from soybeans. Other sources of commercial biodiesel include canola oil, animal fat, palm oil, corn oil, waste cooking oil (Felizardo et al., 2006, Kulkarni and Dalai, 2006), and jatropha oil (Barnwal and Sharma, 2005). The typically used process for commercial production of biodiesel is explained in Box 1. Any future production of biodiesel from microalgae is expected to use the same process. Production of methyl esters, or biodiesel, from microalgal oil has been demonstrated (Belarbi et al., 2000) although the product was intended for pharmaceutical use.

Section snippets

Potential of microalgal biodiesel

Replacing all the transport fuel consumed in the United States with biodiesel will require 0.53 billion m3 of biodiesel annually at the current rate of consumption. Oil crops, waste cooking oil and animal fat cannot realistically satisfy this demand. For example, meeting only half the existing U.S. transport fuel needs by biodiesel, would require unsustainably large cultivation areas for major oil crops. This is demonstrated in Table 1. Using the average oil yield per hectare from various

Microalgal biomass production

Producing microalgal biomass is generally more expensive than growing crops. Photosynthetic growth requires light, carbon dioxide, water and inorganic salts. Temperature must remain generally within 20 to 30 °C. To minimize expense, biodiesel production must rely on freely available sunlight, despite daily and seasonal variations in light levels.

Growth medium must provide the inorganic elements that constitute the algal cell. Essential elements include nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), iron and in

Comparison of raceways and tubular photobioreactors

Table 3 compares photobioreactor and raceway methods of producing microalgal biomass. This comparison is for an annual production level of 100 t of biomass in both cases. Both production methods consume an identical amount of carbon dioxide (Table 3), if losses to atmosphere are disregarded. The production methods in Table 3 are compared for optimal combinations of biomass productivity and concentration that have been actually achieved in large-scale photobioreactors and raceways.

Acceptability of microalgal biodiesel

For user acceptance, microalgal biodiesel will need to comply with existing standards. In the United States the relevant standard is the ASTM Biodiesel Standard D 6751 (Knothe, 2006). In European Union, separate standards exist for biodiesel intended for vehicle use (Standard EN 14214) and for use as heating oil (Standard EN 14213) (Knothe, 2006).

Microalgal oils differ from most vegetable oils in being quite rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids with four or more double bonds (Belarbi et al., 2000

Economics of biodiesel production

Recovery of oil from microalgal biomass and conversion of oil to biodiesel are not affected by whether the biomass is produced in raceways or photobioreactors. Hence, the cost of producing the biomass is the only relevant factor for a comparative assessment of photobioreactors and raceways for producing microalgal biodiesel.

For the facilities detailed in Table 3, the estimated cost of producing a kilogram of microalgal biomass is $2.95 and $3.80 for photobioreactors and raceways, respectively.

Improving economics of microalgal biodiesel

Cost of producing microalgal biodiesel can be reduced substantially by using a biorefinery based production strategy, improving capabilities of microalgae through genetic engineering and advances in engineering of photobioreactors.

Conclusion

As demonstrated here, microalgal biodiesel is technically feasible. It is the only renewable biodiesel that can potentially completely displace liquid fuels derived from petroleum. Economics of producing microalgal biodiesel need to improve substantially to make it competitive with petrodiesel, but the level of improvement necessary appears to be attainable. Producing low-cost microalgal biodiesel requires primarily improvements to algal biology through genetic and metabolic engineering. Use of

References (101)

  • H. Fukuda et al.

    Biodiesel fuel production by transesterification of oils

    J Biosci Bioeng

    (2001)
  • M. Gavrilescu et al.

    Biotechnology — a sustainable alternative for chemical industry

    Biotechnol Adv

    (2005)
  • M.L. Ghirardi et al.

    Microalgae: a green source of renewable H2

    Trends Biotechnol

    (2000)
  • I.A. Guschina et al.

    Lipids and lipid metabolism in eukaryotic algae

    Prog Lipid Res

    (2006)
  • M. Kalin et al.

    The removal of uranium from mining waste water using algal/microbial biomass

    J Environ Radioact

    (2005)
  • I.K. Kapdan et al.

    Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials

    Enzyme Microb Technol

    (2006)
  • R. León-Bañares et al.

    Transgenic microalgae as green cell-factories

    Trends Biotechnol

    (2004)
  • J. Mata-Alvarez et al.

    Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives

    Bioresour Technol

    (2000)
  • L.C. Meher et al.

    Technical aspects of biodiesel production by transesterification — a review

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2006)
  • A. Melis

    Green alga hydrogen production: progress, challenges and prospects

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2002)
  • B. Metting et al.

    Biologically-active compounds from microalgae

    Enzyme Microb Technol

    (1986)
  • E. Molina Grima et al.

    Photobioreactors: light regime, mass transfer, and scaleup

    J Biotechnol

    (1999)
  • E. Molina Grima et al.

    Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics

    Biotechnol Adv

    (2003)
  • R. Munoz et al.

    Algal–bacterial processes for the treatment of hazardous contaminants: a review

    Water Res

    (2006)
  • C. Ratledge

    Single cell oils — have they a biotechnological future?

    Trends Biotechnol

    (1993)
  • R.P.J.M. Raven et al.

    Biogas plants in Denmark: successes and setbacks

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2007)
  • A. Sánchez Mirón et al.

    Comparative evaluation of compact photobioreactors for large-scale monoculture of microalgae

    J Biotechnol

    (1999)
  • J.A. Sánchez Pérez et al.

    Shear rate in stirred tank and bubble column bioreactors

    Chem Eng J

    (2006)
  • S. Sawayama et al.

    CO2 fixation and oil production through microalga

    Energy Convers Manag

    (1995)
  • R. Sharma et al.

    Production, purification, characterization, and applications of lipases

    Biotechnol Adv

    (2001)
  • Y. Shimizu

    Microalgal metabolites

    Curr Opin Microbiol

    (2003)
  • P. Spolaore et al.

    Commercial applications of microalgae

    J Biosci Bioeng

    (2006)
  • K.L. Terry et al.

    System design for the autotrophic production of microalgae

    Enzyme Microb Technol

    (1985)
  • R.K. Thakur et al.

    Static mixers in the process industries — a review

    Chem Eng Res Des

    (2003)
  • Z. Zhang et al.

    Effects of the hydrodynamic environment and shear protectants on survival of erythrocytes in suspension

    J Biotechnol

    (1995)
  • F.G. Acién Fernández et al.

    A model for light distribution and average solar irradiance inside outdoor tubular photobioreactors for the microalgal mass culture

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (1997)
  • F.G. Acién Fernández et al.

    Modelling of biomass productivity in tubular photobioreactors for microalgal cultures. Effects of dilution rate, tube diameter and solar irradiance

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (1998)
  • A. Banerjee et al.

    Botryococcus braunii: a renewable source of hydrocarbons and other chemicals

    Crit Rev Biotechnol

    (2002)
  • M.A. Borowitzka

    Pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals from microalgae

  • F. Camacho Rubio et al.

    Prediction of dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration profiles in tubular photobioreactors for microalgal culture

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (1999)
  • F. Camacho Rubio et al.

    A mechanistic model of photosynthesis in microalgae

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (2003)
  • A.P. Carvalho et al.

    Microalgal reactors: a review of enclosed system designs and performances

    Biotechnol Prog

    (2006)
  • Y. Chisti

    An unusual hydrocarbon

    J Ramsay Soc

    (1980–81)
  • Y. Chisti
  • Y. Chisti

    Pneumatically agitated bioreactors in industrial and environmental bioprocessing: hydrodynamics, hydraulics and transport phenomena

    Appl Mech Rev

    (1998)
  • Y. Chisti

    Shear sensitivity

  • Y. Chisti

    Hydrodynamic damage to animal cells

    Crit Rev Biotechnol

    (2001)
  • Y. Chisti et al.

    Prediction of liquid circulation velocity in airlift reactors with biological media

    J Chem Technol Biotechnol

    (1988)
  • Y. Chisti et al.

    On the calculation of shear rate and apparent viscosity in airlift and bubble column bioreactors

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (1989)
  • Y. Chisti et al.

    Improve the performance of airlift reactors

    Chem Eng Prog

    (1993)
  • Cited by (7784)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text