Elsevier

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volume 419, 1 September 2021, 130013
Chemical Engineering Journal

Review
Progress in antimony capturing by superior materials: Mechanisms, properties and perspectives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Possible removal mechanism on account of chemical properties of Sb were assessed.

  • Properties, performance and mechanism for Sb by various types of advanced materials were reviewed.

  • Merits and challenge for different types of synthetic materials were proposed.

Abstract

Antimony (Sb) is naturally present and abundant in the Earth’s crust, and meanwhile, it is widely used in manufacturing industries. Recently the capturing/removal of excess Sb from water has attracted large attention due to its un-expected high toxicity. This review summarizes the recent advances in Sb removal by promising materials, including bimetal (hydro)oxides, layered double hydroxides, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), magnetic nanostructured materials and polymer-based composite materials. The relationship between individual chemical properties of Sb species and their removal mechanisms is firstly demonstrated, and the removal mechanisms are also analyzed at micro- and macroscopic levels. The typical features, preparation procedures, performance, relative merits as well as the challenges and perspectives of these promising materials are reviewed and discussed. The removal of Sb species by the new-born poly(ionic liquid)s and imprinted polymer is also briefly presented. This review will provide inspiring information on designing novel and superior materials for the removal of antimony species from aqueous media.

Introduction

Environmental degradation caused by pollutants have motivated interests in developing functional materials for capture of them such as heavy metals and organic contaminants. This is especially true when the pollutants are largely released into environment due to the anthropogenic activities. Antimony (Sb) is listed as one of poisonous heavy metals due to its certified adverse effects on humans and biological systems [86]. Natural processes such as rock weathering and volcanic activities, especially the anthropogenic activities such as exploitation and overuse of materials containing Sb in manufacturing industries, resulting in serious Sb decontamination in aquatic systems. Nowadays, many countries and areas have increasing aggravations of Sb pollution, such as China [36], [63], [137], Canada [91], Italy [94], Iran [108] and India [18]. Unfortunately, the capturing/removal of Sb species was not paid attention until the detectable toxicity and harm to humans at 1990 s.

Sb has a typical of s2p3 outer electric orbits with four oxidation states (-3, 0, +3 and + 5). They are subjected to hydrolyze in aquatic systems and mainly existed in negatively-charged pentavalent (Sb(V)) and uncharged trivalent (Sb(III)) species, in which Sb(III) is ten times more toxic than Sb(V). Among various technologies, adsorption is one of the most important methods for the removal of toxic metals involving the merits of simplicity, economics and high efficiency. Considerable researches have been devoted to concentrate and adsorb Sb species by the natural minerals with abundant hydroxyl groups via surface complexation, including goethite (α-FeOOH), hydrous ferric oxide (HFO), hematite (α-Fe2O3), maghemite (γ-Fe2O3), ferrihydrite and magnetite (Fe3O4) [32], [52], [96], [97], [124], [125]. However, the natural minerals generally have a low purity, instability, low adsorption rate and powered nature [29]. Thus, various types of advanced synthetic materials have been intentionally designed and developed for effective removal of Sb species from aqueous media. Fig. 1 illustrates important developmental progresses of synthetic materials for the removal of Sb such as bimetallic (hydro)oxides, mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). To date, there are numerous reviews summarizing the speciation, toxicity, distribution, mobility and fate of Sb, as well as the removal technologies using iron-based materials for Sb [20], [27], [35], [39], [62], [112], [121], [123]. However, to the best of the author’s knowledge, recent advances of various advanced synthetic materials for the capturing of Sb has not yet been reported. Similar literature reviews regarding other heavy metals such as arsenic have been reported [69]. Considering the worsening contamination and rigorous Sb regulation in water, it is of great importance and urgency to give a comprehensive summary about the recent advances on the development of artificial materials for Sb pollution control.

In this review, we provide a critical summary of the state of the art in the fields of design, properties and removal mechanism for capturing of Sb species by superior materials. Firstly, we discuss the possible removal mechanism combing the chemical properties of Sb species. Secondly, we critically review the recent progress on the application of bimetal-based (hydro)oxides, nanostructured materials, and polymer-host materials. Moreover, the material fabrication path, removal performance and mechanism are systematically summarized. Finally, future challenges and perspectives for capturing of Sb are addressed in this review.

Section snippets

Possible mechanisms for Sb capturing

The predominant existing species of Sb are highly related to pH values and potentials, where Sb(V) mainly existed as Sb(OH)6 having an octahedral configuration with a pKa of 2.72, and Sb(III) predominantly existed as Sb(OH)3 with a pyramidal configuration and a pKa of 11.6 at a wide pH range, respectively. The comparison of chemical properties of Sb(III) and Sb(V) are listed in Table 1. Correspondingly, the removal performance and mechanisms are closely related to their chemical properties.

Bimetal-based materials

Metal and metallic oxides have been proposed as low-cost and effective adsorbents for Sb removal via redox reaction and surface complexation, such as by iron oxides [32], [38], [105], [145], manganese oxides [46], [115], [118], [127], alumina oxides [45]and zirconium oxides [54], [79]. Table 3 shows some reported metal-based materials for the removal of Sb. It can be found that most of the bimetal (hydro)oxides possess better removal capacities than the single-metal (hydro)oxides. Here in this

Nanostructured materials

In general, nanomaterials have outstanding removal capacities for heavy metal ions due to their unique size-dependent properties [19], [113]. Here in this section, we focus on discussing the removal of Sb by nanomaterials in the categories of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), magnetic nanocomposite, and novel functionalized nanocomposite materials. We also assess possible improvements in the real applicability of these nanomaterials.

Polymer-based composite materials

Polymers have attracted tremendous interests in environmental applications on account of their good chemical stability, high mechanical properties and easy processing. In this section, we will discuss the designed neat polymers and polymer-host composite materials utilized for Sb removal, respectively.

Conclusion and perspective

In this review, we examined the recent progresses on superior and novel materials for the removal of Sb species, mainly including bimetal-based materials, MOFs, nanocomposites, and polymer-based materials. The possible removal mechanisms are highly related to the chemical properties of Sb species. Firstly, comparisons and characteristics of ordinary bimetal oxides and LDHs are concluded. Secondly, MOFs (e.g., Zr-based and Fe-based MOFs) exhibit superior removal properties for Sb species.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

Pengfei Qi and Yan Wang contribute equally to this manuscript. This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (52000110), Natural science foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019QD019), and Program for Taishan Scholar of Shandong Province.

References (156)

  • K. Cheng et al.

    New insights into the removal of antimony from water using an iron-based metal-organic framework: Adsorption behaviors and mechanisms

    Colloids Surf. A

    (2020)
  • L.V. Constantino et al.

    Sorption-desorption of antimony species onto calcined hydrotalcite: Surface structure and control of competitive anions

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2018)
  • S. Dong et al.

    Synthesis of graphene oxide/schwertmannite nanocomposites and their application in Sb(V) adsorption from water

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2015)
  • X. Dou et al.

    Antimonate removal from water using hierarchical macro-/mesoporous amorphous alumina

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2015)
  • X. Du et al.

    Removal of antimony(III) from polluted surface water using a hybrid coagulation-flocculation-ultrafiltration (CF-UF) process

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2014)
  • M. Filella et al.

    Occurrence and fate of antimony in plastics

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2020)
  • L. Fu et al.

    Oxidation of antimony(III) in soil by manganese(IV) oxide using X-ray absorption fine structure

    J. Environ Sci.

    (2018)
  • K.-H. Goh et al.

    Application of layered double hydroxides for removal of oxyanions: A review

    Water Res.

    (2008)
  • M.A. González et al.

    Removal of Cu2+, Pb2+ and Cd2+ by layered double hydroxide–humate hybrid. Sorbate and sorbent comparative studies

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2014)
  • X. Guo et al.

    Adsorption of antimony onto iron oxyhydroxides: Adsorption behavior and surface structure

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2014)
  • X. Guo et al.

    Layered double hydroxide/eggshell membrane: An inorganic biocomposite membrane as an efficient adsorbent for Cr(VI) removal

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • H. Hao et al.

    Simultaneous cationic Cu(II)-anionic Sb(III) removal by NH2-Fe3O4-NTA core-shell magnetic nanoparticle sorbents synthesized via a facile one-pot approach

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2019)
  • M. He et al.

    Antimony speciation in the environment: Recent advances in understanding the biogeochemical processes and ecological effects

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2019)
  • M. He et al.

    Antimony pollution in China

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2012)
  • I. Herath et al.

    Antimony as a global dilemma: Geochemistry, mobility, fate and transport

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2017)
  • J. Hou et al.

    Metal-organic framework gels and monoliths

    Chem. Sci.

    (2020)
  • X. Hu et al.

    Simultaneous decontamination of arsenite and antimonite using an electrochemical CNT filter functionalized with nanoscale goethite

    Chemosphere

    (2021)
  • B. Hudcová et al.

    Antimonate adsorption onto Mg-Fe layered double hydroxides in aqueous solutions at different pH values: Coupling surface complexation modeling with solid-state analyses

    Chemosphere

    (2019)
  • B. Hudcová et al.

    Sorption mechanisms of arsenate on Mg-Fe layered double hydroxides: A combination of adsorption modeling and solid state analysis

    Chemosphere

    (2017)
  • X. Jia et al.

    The antimony sorption and transport mechanisms in removal experiment by Mn-coated biochar

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • H. Jiang et al.

    Efficient antimony removal by self-assembled core-shell nanocomposite of Co3O4@rGO and the analysis of its adsorption mechanism

    Environ. Res.

    (2020)
  • T. Kameda et al.

    Equilibrium and kinetics studies on As(V) and Sb(V) removal by Fe2+-doped Mg-Al layered double hydroxides

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2015)
  • P.A. Kobielska et al.

    Metal-organic frameworks for heavy metal removal from water

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2018)
  • F. Kolbe et al.

    Sorption of aqueous antimony and arsenic species onto akaganeite

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2011)
  • B. Lan et al.

    Aqueous arsenic(As) and antimony(Sb) removal by potassium ferrate

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2016)
  • S.-H. Lee et al.

    Carbothermal preparation of magnetic-responsible ferrihydrite based on Fe-rich precipitates for immobilization of arsenate and antimonate: Batch and spectroscopic studies

    Chemosphere

    (2019)
  • S.-H. Lee et al.

    Enhanced adsorption of arsenate and antimonate by calcined Mg/Al layered double hydroxide: Investigation of comparative adsorption mechanism by surface characterization

    Chemosphere

    (2018)
  • G. Li et al.

    Research on the removal mechanism of antimony on α-MnO2 nanorod in aqueous solution: DFT + U method

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2018)
  • J. Li et al.

    Antimony contamination, consequences and removal techniques: A review

    Ecotox. Environ. Safe.

    (2018)
  • X. Li et al.

    Antimony(V) removal from water by iron-zirconium bimetal oxide: Performance and mechanism

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2012)
  • B. Liu et al.

    Comparing adsorption of arsenic and antimony from single-solute and bi-solute aqueous systems onto ZIF-8

    Colloids Surf. A

    (2018)
  • B. Liu et al.

    A review of functional sorbents for adsorptive removal of arsenic ions in aqueous systems

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2020)
  • R. Liu et al.

    Simultaneous removal of Cd(II) and Sb(V) by Fe-Mn binary oxide: Positive effects of Cd(II) on Sb(V) adsorption

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2015)
  • R. Liu et al.

    Adsorption of antimony(V) onto Mn(II)-enriched surfaces of manganese-oxide and Fe-Mn binary oxide

    Chemosphere

    (2015)
  • S. Liu et al.

    Removal of Sb(III) by sulfidated nanoscale zerovalent iron: The mechanism and impact of environmental conditions

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Simultaneous oxidation and sorption of highly toxic Sb(III) using a dual-functional electroactive filter

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2019)
  • H. Lu et al.

    Enhanced removal of antimony by acid birnessite with doped iron ions: Companied by the structural transformation

    Chemosphere

    (2019)
  • H. Lu et al.

    Simultaneous removal of arsenate and antimonate in simulated and practical water samples by adsorption onto Zn/Fe layered double hydroxide

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2015)
  • B. Ma et al.

    Synergistic process using Fe hydrolytic flocs and ultrafiltration membrane for enhanced antimony(V) removal

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2017)
  • B. Ma et al.

    Enhanced antimony(V) removal using synergistic effects of Fe hydrolytic flocs and ultrafiltration membrane with sludge discharge evaluation

    Water Res.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (28)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text