The investigation of honey bee pesticide poisoning incidents in Czechia
Introduction
The honey bee, Apis mellifera L., is of great importance to humankind in many different ways. Honey bees are considered the most important pollinators of cultural plants and agricultural crops (Klein et al., 2007), but they have additional value in producing unique bee products, such as honey, beeswax, venom, propolis, pollen, and royal jelly, which are important for the colony and are commonly used by humans (Schmidt, 1997; Erban et al., 2019a). Additionally, beekeeping is a part of cultural heritage worldwide (Tautz, 2008). However, beekeeping can endanger substantial colony losses (Neumann and Carreck, 2010) since if beekeepers lose a large portion of managed colonies, the renewal of apiaries can be demanding and frustrating. Honey bees are exposed to various environmental stressors, and pesticide or plant protection product (PPP) exposure is considered an important factor alongside the pressure of pathogens and parasites (vanEngelsdorp et al., 2009). Because honey bees are commonly exposed to pesticides, they are important subjects of regulatory insect risk assessments related to agrochemical use and registration in any country (Desneux et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 2010). Strict regulations for pesticide application exist in different countries; however, poisoning incidents of honey bees occur annually. Although a number of studies have focused on determining pesticide residues in bee matrices, few studies have investigated the presence of pesticides or poisoning incidents in honey bee colonies.
Bees are principally exposed to the effects of pesticides by different routes (Krupke et al., 2012); however, the key issue is whether bees are surface-sprayed or whether they deliver contaminated substances to the hive as nutrient sources for the colony. Foragers are older honey bee workers responsible for the delivery of nutritional products (nectar, pollen, and water) to the colony. Only foragers come into direct contact with pesticides that are applied to plants, and these bees can die in the field due to direct pesticide exposure (Marzaro et al., 2011; Henry et al., 2012). Such a mode of severe pesticide exposure leading to rapid death (within hours or a few days) is denoted as an acute toxic effect. A second possible route of pesticide exposure is when foragers are not directly exposed to pesticides in the field but bring contaminated nutrient sources into the colony; thus, the entire colony can be influenced by stored supplies during processing of the contaminated material (Henry et al., 2012; Rumkee et al., 2017; Sponsler and Johnson, 2017; Crenna et al., 2020). These two routes of exposure to members of the colony can be determined as primary or secondary, respectively (Purdy, 2015). Thus, the importance of pesticide acquisition by foragers and the distribution of the pesticides brought by foragers into the colony have been underlined. In addition, while some of foragers acquire dangerous doses of pesticides, the majority of the colony can remain unaffected (Sponsler and Johnson, 2017). However, the oral pesticide uptake for bees in the colony has been shown to be higher than for the foragers bringing the nutrients to the colony (Crenna et al., 2020). Predicting the pesticide distribution in a colony brought by foragers with food source is difficult due to random distribution, but the exposure of larva and in-hive bees is more likely when the food with pesticides grows near them. Indeed, the pesticide contents for the receiver bees and larva depend on particular days that the workers bring food to the colony (Rumkee et al., 2017).
If the in-hive environment is contaminated, the sublethal exposure can, in severe cases, lead to chronic poisoning. In case of honey bees, this situation can be considered worse than acute toxic exposure with dead exposed foragers because the entire bee colony can be poisoned virtually unobserved; in that connection, it is important consider that bees are social insects with tens of thousands of members in a strong colony and, thus, are able to substitute the sudden losses of hundreds of members (i.e., acutely poisoned workers). Wu et al. (2011) highlighted the importance of contaminated brood comb. In such cases, brood development and adult bee longevity, as well as queen survival, can be affected by pesticide exposure (Wu et al., 2011). In addition, the bees developing from high pesticide residues containing brood comb were more susceptible to Nosema ceranae infection (Wu et al., 2012), but this susceptibility can also be true for other pathogens.
The chronic exposure of bees to pesticides has increased importance because it can be connected to additional adverse effects, such as interactions of pesticides with diverse microbial pathogens of bees (Doublet et al., 2015). The effects of sublethal doses of pesticides on the behavior of honey bees have been demonstrated, and most attention has been paid to systemic pesticides, such as neonicotinoids and fipronil (Thompson, 2003; El Hassani et al., 2005; Aliouane et al., 2009; Henry et al., 2012; Schneider et al., 2012). Sublethal pesticide exposure has raised the possibility of pesticide interactions that exhibit different stressors than those of individual pesticide exposure (Blanken et al., 2015; Wegener et al., 2016; Booton et al., 2017; Straub et al., 2019). Thus, interactions among multiple pesticides can have synergistic or additive effects on colony fitness (Pilling and Jepson, 1993; Pilling et al., 1995; Johnson et al., 2009, 2010, 2013; Wu et al., 2011), and bees with potentially altered immune systems due to pesticide exposure can also be more susceptible to parasites, such as the microsporidian N. ceranae (Pettis et al., 2012, 2013; Wu et al., 2012) or other pathogenic stressors, such as bacterial pathogens (Hernandez Lopez et al., 2017) and viruses (DeGrandi-Hoffman et al., 2013; Simon-Delso et al., 2014; Straub et al., 2019). For instance, chronic thiamethoxam exposure was observed to increase chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV) levels in bees (Coulon et al., 2019). Moreover, it has been indicated that pesticide pressure influences the honey bee immune system through an altered gut microbiome (Kakumanu et al., 2016; Motta et al., 2018; Daisley et al., 2020). Honey bee exposure to sublethal pesticide doses also leads to additional toxic compounds related to pesticides: potential metabolites that are produced in bees and/or plants and represent risks to non-targets similar to the precursor compound (Suchail et al., 2001; Seifrtova et al., 2017; Erban et al., 2019b). An important example of a hazardous pesticide metabolite is imidacloprid-olefin, a substance found to be formed in honey bees (Suchail et al., 2001, 2004a, b), bumblebees (Erban et al., 2019b) and plants (Nauen et al., 1998; Seifrtova et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019). Imidacloprid-olefin was found to be more toxic to honey bees (Suchail et al., 2001) and different insects (Nauen et al., 1998, 1999) than the precursor compound imidacloprid. Moreover, in chronic exposure of bumblebees to imidacloprid in laboratory experiments, imidacloprid-olefin prevailed in bumblebees on the imidacloprid. This result, together with the suppression of the mevalonate pathway and fatty acid synthesis (Erban et al., 2019b), could explain the observed cumulative and delayed effect of imidacloprid exposure (Rondeau et al., 2015), including the nest behavior (Crall et al., 2018). Therefore, the environmental fate, transformations and side effects of pesticides are of importance. Finally, it is important to consider for each pesticide that the formulation in which a pesticide is applied can be a significant factor in bee poisoning (Mullin et al., 2015), although it is not commonly mentioned. However, the effect of formulation can be considered less meaningful for poisoning incidents in the case of high-toxicity pesticides compared to low-toxicity pesticides.
Different studies have aimed to screen pesticide residues in honey bees and bee matrices, such as pollen, honey or wax, to connect exposure data to bee health (e.g. (Chauzat and Faucon, 2007; Chauzat et al., 2009; Mullin et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2011, 2012; Lozowicka, 2013; Pettis et al., 2013; Barganska et al., 2014; Ravoet et al., 2015; Herrera Lopez et al., 2016; Calatayud-Vernich et al., 2018)). Studies have also analyzed samples from colonies showing mortality episodes, losses or death incidents for pesticide residues (Porrini et al., 2003; Kasiotis et al., 2014; Calatayud-Vernich et al., 2016, 2019; Beyer et al., 2018); however, these investigations are troublesome due to reductions in colony size and deaths being multifactorial issues (Kasiotis et al., 2014). The toxicity of pesticides to bees, with a focus on the situation in the USA, was reviewed by Johnson et al. (2010); the presence of pesticides has been shown in wax, pollen, bees and honey (Johnson et al., 2010). Additionally, a review by Blacquiere et al. (2012) focused specifically on neonicotinoid exposure in bees (Blacquiere et al., 2012). However, in this study, we aimed to investigate acute bee poisoning incidents – which were, importantly, officially examined by the authority of the Czech Republic after notification by beekeepers. Although bee poisoning incidents are of high interest and poisoning incidents are legislatively controlled in different countries, relevant scientific studies are rare. Kiljanek et al. (2016a) reviewed the pesticide poisoning of bees. Kiljanek et al. (2016b) also investigated pesticides from 70 suspected bee poisoning incidents and detected an array of 57 pesticides and metabolites in poisoned bee samples (Kiljanek et al., 2016b). The incidents of bee poisoning by pesticides in the UK were summarized in different years (Fletcher and Barnett, 2003; Barnett et al., 2007). Furthermore, there is an available report of bee poisoning in Germany in spring 2008 from the abrasion of active substances on treated seeds during the sowing of maize (Pistorius et al., 2009) and a study of incidents in Canada in 2007–2012 due to neonicotinoid exposure (Cutler et al., 2014) There is also a report on the largest mass incident in Czechia due to the insecticide Regent containing the active substance fipronil (Modra and Svobodova, 2009). Along with these and other publications, additional information should be found from the governmental organizations in different countries that analyze samples collected by local bee inspectors of the suspected poisonings from beekeepers. Overall, it is important to stress that the concentration of pesticides in bee samples can indicate the cause of bee poisoning. However, proving the source or offender of the poisoning requires determining a connection between coincidently/recently applied pesticides on crops and the dead bees; this is valid and most important, especially from the point of view of legislation.
In this study, we investigated suspected bee poisoning incidents in Czechia in 2015 and 2016. For comparison with the incidents, we also included samples collected from colonies/apiaries that did not show poisoning symptoms. The samples of suspected poisoning used in this study were collected in relation to the cases investigated by the State Veterinary Administration of the Czech Republic (SVA CR) in 2015 and 2016. We inspected selected samples with a more detailed approach than the valid regulation protocol in Czechia, which simply requires a comparison of the dead bees and a plant treated with PPPs that is suspected as the source of poisoning. We addressed the investigation of honey bee pesticide poisoning from a novel perspective; that is, we evaluated cases of honey bee poisoning and risks associated with the level and array of pesticides in samples (Fig. 1). We also discuss pesticides currently evaluated to represent high risks to bees and, therefore, are banned in the EU.
Section snippets
Sample collection
Samples of the suspected poisoning incidents were collected from the following ten locations in Czechia: Panosi Ujezd on 20th May 2015, Rohovladova Bela on 23rd and 26th May 2015, Libodrice on 11th June 2015, Steti on 3rd July 2015, Chrudim on 7th June 2016, Vlkov nad Lesy on 16, 17 and 19th May 2016, Tisice on 24th May 2016, Dlouhopolsko on 9th August 2016, Hysly on 15th September 2016, and Sedmihorky on 27th September 2016. These samples consisted of dead/dying bees near the hive, live hive
Pesticide diversity in samples
Overall, in the suspected poisoning samples, 23 pesticides and 2 metabolites were identified (Table 1). However, the pesticide contents differed among the bee, bee bread or plant tissue matrices. According to the frequency and quantity found in samples, the most important pesticide found in bees can be considered the highly toxic organophosphate chlorpyrifos (Table S2). The risks of chlorpyrifos underline its coincidence in the cases of the poisoning incidents, especially dead bee samples (
Conclusion
In conclusion, we reported that acute bee poisoning incidents occurred in our country mainly due to PPP application to rapeseed crops. Although some pesticides, especially highly toxic insecticides, could cause the acute poisoning effect alone, it is highly important to note that their effect was increased by the use of pesticide cocktails in some cases. Furthermore, pesticides occur in the environment in mixtures, and synergistic/additive effects are difficult to predict. In addition to
CRediT author statement
Klara Kadlikova: Data Curation, Visualization, Methodology, Sample Processing, Documentation, Writing- Original draft preparation. Marta Vaclavikova: Writing- Reviewing and Editing, Methodology. Tatana Halesova: Conceptualization, Reviewing and Editing, Methodology. Martin Kamler: Sample Collection, Methodology, Documentation, Conceptualization, Reviewing and Editing. Martin Markovic: Reviewing and Editing. Tomas Erban: Writing- Original draft preparation, Conceptualization, Visualization,
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
All authors were supported by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic by project No. TA04020267. KK, ET and MM were supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic by project No. RO0418. KK, ET, MK and MM were supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic – NAZV by project No. QK1910018.
We would like to thank veterinary inspectors and the State Veterinary Administration of the Czech Republic for providing information on causalities of bee poisonings. This
References (132)
- et al.
Honeybee Apis mellifera acetylcholinesterase—a biomarker to detect deltamethrin exposure
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.
(2008) - et al.
Biological and biochemical effects of chronic exposure to very low levels of dietary cypermethrin (Cymbush) on honeybee colonies (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.
(1999) - et al.
Stress-mediated Allee effects can cause the sudden collapse of honey bee colonies
J. Theor. Biol.
(2017) - et al.
Influence of pesticide use in fruit orchards during blooming on honeybee mortality in 4 experimental apiaries
Sci. Total Environ.
(2016) - et al.
Pesticide residues in honey bees, pollen and beeswax: assessing beehive exposure
Environ. Pollut.
(2018) - et al.
A two-year monitoring of pesticide hazard in-hive: high honey bee mortality rates during insecticide poisoning episodes in apiaries located near agricultural settings
Chemosphere
(2019) - et al.
Characterizing honey bee exposure and effects from pesticides for chemical prioritization and life cycle assessment
Environ. Int.
(2020) - et al.
Widespread contamination of wildflower and bee-collected pollen with complex mixtures of neonicotinoids and fungicides commonly applied to crops
Environ. Int.
(2016) - et al.
Delivering integrated pest and pollinator management (IPPM)
Trends Plant Sci.
(2020) - et al.
Effects of sublethal doses of fipronil on the behavior of the honeybee (Apis mellifera)
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(2005)
Chronic exposure of bumblebees to neonicotinoid imidacloprid suppresses the entire mevalonate pathway and fatty acid synthesis
J. Proteomics
A review of the factors that influence pesticide residues in pollen and nectar: future research requirements for optimising the estimation of pollinator exposure
Environ. Pollut.
Toxic effects of pesticide mixtures at a molecular level: their relevance to human health
Toxicology
Screening of pesticide residues in honeybee wax comb by LC-ESI-MS/MS. A pilot study
Chemosphere
Mechanism for the differential toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides in the honey bee, Apis mellifera
Crop Protect.
Pesticide residues in honeybees, honey and bee pollen by LC-MS/MS screening: reported death incidents in honeybees
Sci. Total Environ.
Pollen and bee bread as new health-oriented products: a review
Trends Food Sci. Technol.
Multi-residue method for the determination of pesticides and pesticide metabolites in honeybees by liquid and gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry—honeybee poisoning incidents
J. Chromatogr. A
The development, validation and application of a GC-dual detector (NPD-ECD) multi-pesticide residue method for monitoring bee poisoning incidents
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.
The formulation makes the honey bee poison
Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.
Thiamethoxam is a neonicotinoid precursor converted to clothianidin in insects and plants
Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.
Mechanism of synergism between the pyrethroid insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin and the imidazole fungicide prochloraz, in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)
Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.
Effects of pesticide mixtures in human and animal models: an update of the recent literature
Chem. Biol. Interact.
Subchronic exposure of honeybees to sublethal doses of pesticides: effects on behavior
Environ. Toxicol. Chem.
Comparing response of buff-tailed bumblebees and red mason bees to application of a thiacloprid-prochloraz mixture under semi-field conditions
Ecotoxicology
Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce
J. AOAC Int.
Determination of pesticide residues in honeybees using modified QUEChERS sample work-up and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
Molecules
Incidents of bee poisoning with pesticides in the United Kingdom, 1994–2003
Pest Manag. Sci.
Pesticide residue profiles in bee bread and pollen samples and the survival of honeybee colonies—a case study from Luxembourg
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment
Ecotoxicology
Interaction between Varroa destructor and imidacloprid reduces flight capacity of honeybees
Proc. Biol. Sci.
Pesticide residues in beeswax samples collected from honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.) in France
Pest Manag. Sci.
A survey of pesticide residues in pollen loads collected by honey bees in France
J. Econ. Entomol.
Influence of pesticide residues on honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colony health in France
Environ. Entomol.
Evidence of synergy between prochloraz and deltamethrin in Apis mellifera L.: a convenient biological approach
Pestic. Sci.
Influence of chronic exposure to thiamethoxam and chronic bee paralysis virus on winter honey bees
PloS One
Zakon c. 299/2017 Sb. Zakon, kterym se meni zakon c. 326/2004 Sb., o rostlinolekarske peci a o zmene nekterych souvisejicich zakonu, ve zneni pozdejsich predpisu, a dalsi souvisejici zakony [Act No. 299/2017 Coll., amending Act No. 326/2004 Coll., on phytosanitary care and amending some related acts, as amended, and other related acts]
Neonicotinoid exposure disrupts bumblebee nest behavior, social networks, and thermoregulation
Science
Honey bees, neonicotinoids and bee incident reports: the Canadian situation
Pest Manag. Sci.
Zakon C. 326/2004 Sb., O Rostlinolekarske Peci a O Zmene Nekterych Souvisejicich Zakonu [Act No. 326/2004 Coll., on phytosanitary care and amending some related acts]
Vyhlaska c. 327/2012 Sb., o ochrane vcel, zvere, vodnich organismu a dalsich necilovych organismu pri pouziti pripravku na ochranu rostlin [Decree No. 327/2012 Coll., on the protection of bees, game, aquatic organisms, and other non-target organisms when using plant protection products]
Chronic toxicity of clothianidin, imidacloprid, chlorpyrifos, and dimethoate to Apis mellifera L. larvae reared in vitro
Pest Manag. Sci.
Missing microbes in bees: how systematic depletion of key symbionts erodes immunity
Trends Microbiol.
The effects of pesticides on queen rearing and virus titers in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)
Insects
A brief review of the environmental fate and metabolism of pyrethroids
Pestic. Sci.
The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods
Annu. Rev. Entomol.
Bees under stress: sublethal doses of a neonicotinoid pesticide and pathogens interact to elevate honey bee mortality across the life cycle
Environ. Microbiol.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 485/2013 of 24 May 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, as regards the conditions of approval of the active substances clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid, and prohibiting the use and sale of seeds treated with plant protection products containing those active substances
Off. J. Eur. Union L
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/113 of 24 January 2018 renewing the approval of the active substance acetamiprid in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011. Off
J. Eur. Union L 20, 7–10
Commission regulations (EU) 2018/783–785 of 29 may 2018. Off
J. Eur. Union L
Cited by (26)
Imidacloprid increases the prevalence of the intestinal parasite Lotmaria passim in honey bee workers
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentPesticide residues in bee bread, propolis, beeswax and royal jelly – A review of the literature and dietary risk assessment
2023, Food and Chemical Toxicology